The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on working poverty: Theoretical and conceptual reflections

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Eric Crettaz
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/161 Language English
Pages 18 P. 7-24 File size 222 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2021-161001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Due to the ongoing Covid-crisis, the number of workers benefiting from short-time work schemes was high, especially during lockdowns, another large group of workers started working from home, and others, unfortunately, lost their jobs. The current situation is unprecedented, because it is the only global recession driven solely by a pandemic and the decrease in life expectancy is the worst since World War II. This article first shows that the literature on the socioeconomic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic does not say much about working poverty. Applying a theo-retical model presented in 2018 based on the four mechanisms that lead to working poverty (at the household level), this article considers the potential short- and midterm implications of the pandemic for the working poor in Europe. It also proposes conceptual reflections about which working poverty indicators may improve our understanding of what has unfolded since the pandemic began.

Keywords: Working poor, In-work poverty, Covid-19, Pandemic, Labour market

  1. Aburto, J.M., Schöley, J., Kashnitsky, I., Zhang, L., Rahal, C., Missov, T.I., Mills, M.C. Dowd, J.B., and Kashyap, R. (2021). Quantifying impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic through life-expectancy losses: a population-level study of 29 countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2021, 1-12.
  2. Alkire, S., Roche, J.M., Ballon, P., Foster, J., Santos, M. E., and Seth, S. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford University Press, USA.
  3. Almeida, V., Barrios, S., Christl, M., De Poli, S., Tumino, A., and van der Wielen, W. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on households´ income in the EU. The Journal of Economic Inequality (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8.
  4. BBC (2020b, June 6). Coronavirus: This is not the last pandemic. Retrieved 15/07/21, -- Https://Www.Bbc.Com/News/Science-Environment-52775386.
  5. BBC (2020a, December 7). Why the pandemic is causing spikes in break-ups and divorces. Retrieved 10/07/2021, -- Https://Www.Bbc.Com/Worklife/Article/20201203-Why-the-Pandemic-Is-Causing-Spikes-in-Break-Ups-and-Divorces.
  6. Bonacini, L., Gallo, G., and Scicchitano, S. (2021). Working from home and income inequality: Risks of a ‘new normal’ with COVID-19. Journal of Population Economics, 34(1), 303-360. DOI: 10.1007/s00148-020-00800-7
  7. Brewer, M., Gardiner, L. (2020). The initial impact of COVID-19 and policy responses on household incomes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36 (Supplement_1): 187-199. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/graa024.
  8. Brewer, M., Tasseva, I. (2020). Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes? (EUROMOD Working Paper, No. EM12/20r,). University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER).
  9. Clark, A., d’Ambrosio, C., and Lepinteur, A. (2021). The Falling Income Inequality during COVID-19 in Five European Countries (halshs-03185534).
  10. Comolli, C.L. (2017). The fertility response to the Great Recession in Europe and the United States: Structural economic conditions and perceived economic uncertainty. Demographic Research, 36(51), 1549-1600.
  11. Coromaldi, M., Zoli, M. (2012). Deriving multidimensional poverty indicators: Methodological issues and an empirical analysis for Italy. Social Indicators Research, 107(1), 37-54. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9825-6
  12. Crettaz, E. (2011). Fighting working poverty in post-industrial economies: Causes, trade-offs and policy solutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  13. Crettaz, E. (2013). A state-of-the-art review of working poverty in advanced economies: Theoretical models, measurement issues and risk groups. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(4), 347-362. DOI: 10.1177/0958928713507470
  14. Crettaz, E. (2015). Poverty and material deprivation among European workers in times of crisis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(4), 312-323. DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12132
  15. Crettaz, E., Jacot, C. (2014). Do family policies matter for educational outcomes? Patterns of educational mobility and family services in Europe. European Societies, 16(5), 645–665. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2014.946070
  16. Crettaz, E., Suter, C. (2013). The impact of adaptive preferences on subjective indicators: An analysis of poverty indicators. Social Indicators Research, 114(1), 139–152. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0388-6
  17. Eurostat (2021a). Annual inflation up to 1.3% in the euro area. Up to 1.7% in the EU (Euroindicators 45/2021). Eurostat.
  18. Eurostat (2021c). Job vacancies in number and % — NACE Rev. 2, B-S, quarterly data. Retrieved 06/07/21, -- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00172/default/table?lang=en.
  19. Eurostat (2021d). Quarterly registrations of new businesses and declarations of bankruptcies — Statistics. Retrieved 07/07/21, -- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Quarterly_registrations_of_new_businesses_and_declarations_of_bankruptcies_-_statistics.
  20. Eurostat (2021e). Temporary employees as a percentage of the total number of employees, by sex and age (%). -- Retrieved 07/07/21, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/lfsq_etpga/default/table?lang=en.
  21. Eurostat (2021b). Total unemployment rate. Retrieved 05/07/21, -- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00203/default/table?lang=en.
  22. Filandri, M., Pasqua, S., and Struffolino, E. (2020). Being working poor or feeling working poor? The role of work intensity and job stability for subjective poverty. Social Indicators Research, 147(3), 781-803. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02174-0
  23. France bleu (2020, May 19). Le confinement fatal pour certains couples: Les divorces en hausse. Retrieved 10/07/2021.
  24. Furceri D., Loungani P., Ostry J.D., and Pizzuto P. (2020). Will Covid-19 affect inequality? Evidence from past pandemics. Covid Economics, 12, 138-157.
  25. Gallo, G., Raitano, M. (2020). SOS incomes: Simulated effects of COVID-19 and emergency benefits on individual and household income distribution in Italy. Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, Working paper series, ECINEQ 2020 566.
  26. Goedemé, T., Storms, B., Stockman, S., Penne, T., and Van den Bosch, K. (2015). Towards cross-country comparable reference budgets in Europe: First results of a concerted effort. European Journal of Social Security, 17(1), 3-30. DOI: 10.1177/138826271501700101
  27. Horemans, J. (2018). Atypical employment and in-work poverty. In Lohmann, H., Marx, I. (Eds), Handbook on in-work poverty. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  28. Kakwani, N., Silber, J. (2008). Quantitative approaches to multidimensional poverty measurement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Lohmann, H., Crettaz, E. (2018). Explaining cross-country differences in in-work poverty. In Lohmann, H., Marx, I. (Eds), Handbook on in-work poverty. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  30. Lohmann, H., Marx, I. (2018). Handbook on in-work poverty. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  31. Luppi, F., Arpino, B., and Rosina, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on fertility plans in Italy, Germany, France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Demographic Research, 43, 1399-1412.
  32. Menta, G. (2021). Poverty in the COVID-19 Era: Real Time Data Analysis on Five European Countries (ECINEQ 2021 568). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11574.6304
  33. Müller, T., Schulten, T. (2020). Ensuring fair short-time work-a European overview. ETUI Research Paper-Policy Brief, 7. Brussels: ETUI.
  34. OECD. (2020). OECD employment outlook 2020. Worker security and the Covid-19 crisis. Paris: OECD.
  35. OECD. (2021a). Net replacement rate in unemployment. Retrieved 08/07/21, -- https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=NRR.
  36. Palomino, J. C., Rodríguez, J. G., and Sebastian, R. (2020). Wage inequality and poverty effects of lockdown and social distancing in Europe. European Economic Review, 129, 103564. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103564
  37. Salverda, W. (2018). Low earnings and their drivers in relation to in-work poverty. In Lohmann, H., Marx, I. (Eds), Handbook on in-work poverty. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  38. Scheidel W. (2018), The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century, Princeton University Press.
  39. Smeeding, T.M. (2017). Poverty Measurement. In Brady, D., Burton, L.M. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty. Oxford Handbooks Online.
  40. Struffolino, E., Zagel, H., Braun, J., and Gädecke, M. (2021). Teleworkability in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A household perspective. Berlin: Humboldt Universität, KOMPAKK Interim Report June 2021.
  41. Welt (2020, July 15). Kommt nach dem Sommer die Corona-Trennungswelle? Retrieved 10/07/21, -- Https://Www.Welt.de/Vermischtes/Article211664823/Mehr-Scheidungen-Kommt-Nach-Dem-Sommer-Die-Corona-Trennungswelle.Html.
  42. White, R. (2017). Measuring multidimensional poverty and deprivation: Incidence and determinants in developed countries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  43. World Bank (2020). Global Economic Prospects. Washington DC: World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1553-

Eric Crettaz, The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on working poverty: Theoretical and conceptual reflections in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 161/2021, pp 7-24, DOI: 10.3280/SL2021-161001