The complexity in measuring M&A performance: Is a multi-dimensional approach enough?

Journal title FINANCIAL REPORTING
Author/s Elisa Roncagliolo, Francesco Avallone
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/1
Language English Pages 29 P. 89-117 File size 199 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2021-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

M&A are complex corporate events involving two or more companies and often requiring relevant efforts in order to be successful. For these reasons, both scholars and practitioners are interested in assessing the success rate of M&A and measuring their influence on the corporate performance. Despite the complexity of the M&A phenomenon, previous studies that empirically examine this issue according to an accounting-based perspective, largely adopt single performance measures. Therefore, our study aims to explore whether the use of a multi-dimensional approach in the development of accounting-based performance measures could provide a comprehensive examination of the change in corporate performance due to complex events, such as M&A. In particular, this study assesses the performance of M&A concluded in the European context through the development of multiple accounting-based performance indicators that examine: (i) profitability, (ii) growth, and (iii) financial situation. In addition, we analyse a crucial performance dimension, the cost of employment, which has received limited attention from previous empirical research. Consistently with the multifaceted nature of M&A, results indicate that they provide a mixed impact on different performance measures. Therefore, main findings suggest that the measurement of M&A performance should take into consideration different contextual features

Keywords: M&A complexity; merger and acquisitions; M&A performance; multidimensional approach.

Jel codes: G34, M41

  1. Chatterjee S. (2009), The keys to successful acquisition programmes, Long Range Planning, 42(2), pp. 137-163,
  2. Hassan I., Ghauri P. N. and Mayrhofer U. (2018), Merger and acquisition motives and outcome assessment, Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(4), pp. 709-718,
  3. Agrawal A. and Jaffe J. F. (2000), The post-merger performance puzzle, Advances in mergers and acquisitions, pp. 7-41, DOI: 10.1016/S1479-361X(00)01002-4
  4. Andrade G., Mitchell M. L. and Stafford E. (2001), New evidence and perspectives on mergers, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, pp. 103-120,
  5. Andre P., Kooli M. and L’her J. F. (2004), The long-run performance of mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from the Canadian stock market, Financial Management, 33(4), pp. 27-43,
  6. Angwin D. and Meadows M. (2012), Acquiring Poorly Performing Companies during a Recession: Insights into Post-Acquisition Management, Journal of General Management, 38(1), pp. 1-22,
  7. Barkema H. G. and Schijven M. (2008), How do firms learn to make acquisitions? A review of past research and an agenda for the future, Journal of Management, 34, pp. 594-634, DOI: 10.1177/0149206308316968
  8. Bauer F. and Matzler K. (2014), Antecedents of M&A success: The role of strategic complementarity, cultural fit, and degree and speed of integration, Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), pp. 269-291,
  9. Beccalli E. and Frantz P. (2009), M&A operations and performance in banking, Journal of Financial Services Research, 36(2-3), pp. 203-226,
  10. Bini L., Dainelli F. and Giunta F. (2011), Country effects on European mandatory disclosure of financial key performance indicators, Financial Reporting, 1, pp. 73-91, DOI: 10.3280/FR2011-001004
  11. Brouthers K. D., Van Hastenburg P. and Van Den Ven, J. (1998), If most mergers fail why are they so popular?, Long Range Planning, 31(3), pp. 347-353, DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(98)80002-2
  12. Brown S., Finn M. and Hope O. K. (2000), Acquisition‐Related Provision‐Taking and Post‐Acquisition Performance in the UK Prior to FRS 7, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(9‐10), pp. 1233-1265, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00354
  13. Caiazza R. and Volpe T. (2015), M&A process: a literature review and research agenda, Business Process Management Journal, 21(1), pp. 205-220, DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2013-0145
  14. Calipha R., Tarba S. and Brock D. (2010), Mergers and acquisitions: a review of phases, motives, and success factors, Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 9, pp. 1-24, DOI: 10.1108/S1479-361X(2010)0000009004
  15. Cartwright S. (2006), Mergers and acquisitions: an update and appraisal, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 20, pp. 1-38,
  16. Cartwright S. and Schoenberg R. (2006), Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities, British Journal of Management, 17, pp. S1-S5,
  17. Chatterjee S., Lubatkin M. H., Schweiger D. M. and Weber Y. (1992), Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: linking equity and human capital, Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), pp. 319-334,
  18. Cording M., Christmann P. and Weigelt C. (2010), Measuring theoretically complex constructs: The case of acquisition performance, Strategic Organization, 8(1), pp. 11-41,
  19. Datta D. K. (1991), Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of postacquisition integration, Strategic Management Journal, 12(4), pp. 281-297,
  20. Datta D. K. and Grant J. H. (1990), Relationships between type of acquisition, the autonomy given to the acquired firm, and acquisition success: An empirical analysis, Journal of Management, 16(1), pp. 29-44, DOI: 10.1177/014920639001600103
  21. DeYoung R., Evanoff D. D. and Molyneux P. (2009), Mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions: a review of the post-2000 literature, Journal of Financial services research, 36(2-3), pp. 87-110,
  22. Epstein M. J. (2005), The determinants and evaluation of merger success, Business Horizons, 48(1), pp. 37-46,
  23. Evans P. and Mendenhall M. (2004) in Stahl K.G. and Mendenhall M. (Eds), Mergers and Acquisitions: Managing Culture and Human Resources. (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
  24. Fernández S., Triguero Á. and Alfaro-Cortés E. (2018), M&A effects on innovation and profitability in large European firms, Management Decision, 57(1), pp. 100-114, DOI: 10.1108/MD-08-2017-0730
  25. Flanagan D. J. (1996), Announcements of purely related and purely unrelated mergers and shareholder returns: Reconciling the relatedness paradox, Journal of Management, 22(6), pp. 823-835, DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90038-0
  26. Foster G. (1986). Financial Statement Analysis, 2/e. (Pearson Education India).
  27. Fuller K., Netter J. and Stegemoller M. (2002), What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions, The Journal of Finance, 57(4), pp. 1763-1793, DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00477
  28. Gates S. and Very P. (2003), Measuring performance during M&A integration, Long Range Planning, 36(2), pp. 167-185, DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(03)00004-9
  29. Ghosh A. (2001), Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions?, Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, pp. 151-178,
  30. 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00018-9.
  31. Ghosh A. and Jain P. C. (2000), Financial leverage changes associated with corporate mergers, Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(4), pp. 377-402, DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1199(00)00007-9
  32. Gomes E., Angwin D. N., Weber Y. and Yedidia Tarba S. (2013), Critical success factors through the mergers and acquisitions process: revealing pre‐and post‐M&A connections for improved performance, Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(1), pp. 13-35,
  33. Grigorieva S. and Petrunina T. (2015), The performance of mergers and acquisitions in emerging capital markets: new angle, Journal of Management Control, 26(4), pp. 377-403,
  34. Gugler K., Mueller D., Yurtoglu B. B. and Zulehner C. (2003), The effects of mergers: An international comparison, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(5), pp. 625-653, DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7187(02)00107-8
  35. Harrison J. S., Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R. E. and Ireland R. D. (1991), Synergies and post-acquisition performance: Differences versus similarities in resource allocations, Journal of management, 17(1), pp. 173-190, DOI: 10.1177/014920639101700111
  36. Haspeslagh P. and Jemison D. B. (1991), Managing Acquisitions. (New York: The Free Press).
  37. Hayward M. (2002), When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995, Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 21-39,
  38. Healy P. M., Palepu K. G. and Ruback R. S. (1992), Does corporate performance improve after mergers?, Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), pp. 135-175, DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(92)90002-F
  39. Hitt M., Harrison J., Ireland R. D. and Best A. (1998), Attributes of successful and unsuccessful acquisitions of US firms, British Journal of Management, 9(2), pp. 91-114, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00077
  40. Kim J. Y. and Finkelstein S. (2009), The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry, 1989-2001, Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), pp. 617-646,
  41. King D. R., Dalton D. R., Daily C. M. and Covin J. G. (2004), Meta‐analyses of post‐acquisition performance: Indications of unidentified moderators, Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), pp. 187-200,
  42. KPMG Corporate Finance (2015), M&A Report 2014. -- Retrieved from the Italian section of the KPMG official website: http://www.kpmg.com/it.
  43. Krishnan H. A., Miller A. and Judge W. Q. (1997), Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams?, Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), pp. 361-374,
  44. Kumar S. and Bansal L. K. (2008), The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate performance in India, Management Decision, 46(10), pp. 1531-1543, DOI: 10.1108/00251740810920029
  45. Lakstutiene A., Stankeviciene J., Norvaisiene R. and Narbutiene J. (2015), The Impact of Acquisitions on Corporate Performance Results during the Period of Economic Slowdown: Case of Lithuania, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, pp. 455-460,
  46. Lee G. K. and Lieberman M. B. (2010), Acquisition vs. internal development as modes of market entry, Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), pp. 140-158,
  47. Lewellen W. G. (1971), A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger, Journal of Finance, 26, pp. 521-537,
  48. Lodorfos G. and Boateng A. (2006), The role of culture in the merger and acquisition process, Management Decision, 44(10), pp. 1405-1421, DOI: 10.1108/00251740610715722
  49. Lubatkin M. (1983), Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm, Academy of Management review, 8(2), pp. 218-225,
  50. Madhok A. (1997), Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 18(2), pp. 39-61,
  51. Manson S., Powell R., Stark A. W. and Thomas H. M. (2000), Identifying the sources of gains from takeovers, Accounting Forum, 24(4), pp. 319-343, DOI: 10.1111/1467-6303.00044
  52. Meckl R. (2004), Organising and leading M&A projects, International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), pp. 455-462,
  53. Meeks G. (1977). Disappointing Marriage: Gains from Mergers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  54. Meglio O. and Risberg A. (2011), The (mis) measurement of M&A performance –A systematic narrative literature review, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(4), pp. 418-433,
  55. Morrison J. and Floyd D. (2000), Merger activity: solutions to Japan’s economic downturn?, Management Decision, 38(4), pp. 263-272, DOI: 10.1108/00251740010326324
  56. Oberhofer H. (2013), Employment effects of acquisitions: Evidence from acquired European firms, Review of Industrial Organization, 42(3), pp. 345-363,
  57. Olante M. E. (2014), Towards the international convergence of accounting standards: the case of Business Combinations and Goodwill, Financial Reporting, 2-3-4, pp. 155-170, DOI: 10.3280/FR2014-002007
  58. Onesti T., Romano M. and Taliento M. (2015), Dialogue with standard setters. Business combinations under common control: concerns, criticisms and strides, Financial Reporting, 1, pp. 107-126, DOI: 10.3280/FR2015-001005
  59. Papadakis V. M. and Thanos I. C. (2010), Measuring the performance of acquisitions: An empirical investigation using multiple criteria, British Journal of Management, 21(4), pp. 859-873,
  60. Park C. (2003), Prior performance characteristics of related and unrelated acquirers, Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), pp. 471-480,
  61. Powell R. and Stark A. W. (2005), Does operating performance increase post-takeover for UK takeovers? A comparison of performance measures and benchmarks, Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, pp. 293-317,
  62. Quagli A. (2004), Comunicare il futuro: l’informativa economico-finanziaria di tipo previsionale delle società quotate italiane. (Milano: FrancoAngeli).
  63. Quagli A. and Teodori C. (2005), L’informativa volontaria per settori di attività. (Milano: FrancoAngeli).
  64. Ramaswamy K. P. and Waegelein J. F. (2003), Firm financial performance following mergers, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20(2), pp. 115-126, DOI: 10.1023/A:1023089924640
  65. Rao-Nicholson R., Salaber J. and Cao T. H. (2016), Long-term performance of mergers and acquisitions in ASEAN countries, Research in International Business and Finance, 36, pp. 373-387,
  66. Ravenscraft D. and Scherer F. M. (1987), Life after takeovers, Journal of Industrial Economics, 36, pp. 147-156, DOI: 10.2307/2098409
  67. Ravenscraft D. J. and Scherer F. M. (1989), The profitability of mergers, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7(1), pp. 101-116, DOI: 10.1016/0167-7187(89)90048-9
  68. Risberg A. and Meglio O. (2012), Mergers and acquisitions outcomes-is it meaningful to talk about high failure rates in Weber Y. (ed.), Handbook of research on mergers and acquisitions, pp. 147-171. (Edward Elgar).
  69. Schoenberg R. (2006), Measuring the performance of corporate acquisitions: An empirical comparison of alternative metrics, British Journal of Management, 17(4), pp. 361-370,
  70. Seth A. (1990), Value creation in acquisitions: A re‐examination of performance issues, Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), pp. 99-115,
  71. Seth A., Song K. and Pettit R. (2000), Synergy, materialism or hubris? An empirical examination of motives for foreign acquisitions of US firms, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, pp. 387-405,
  72. Sharma D. S. and Ho J. (2002), The impact of acquisitions on operating performance: Some Australian evidence, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1‐2), pp. 155-200, DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00428
  73. Singh H. and Montgomery C. A. (1987), Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance, Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), pp. 377-386,
  74. Sirower M. L. (1997). Synergy Trap: How Companies Lose the Acquisition Game. (New York: Simon & Schuster).
  75. Straub T., Borzillo S. and Probst G. (2012), A decision-making framework to analyze important dimensions of M&A performance, Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, pp. 199-235,
  76. Suddaby R. (2010), Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories, Academy of Management Review, 35(3), pp. 346-357, DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2010.51141319
  77. Switzer J. A. (1996), Evidence on real gains in corporate acquisitions, Journal of Economics and Business, 48(5), pp. 443-460, DOI: 10.1016/S01486195(96)00033-1.
  78. Teodori C. (2017). Analisi di bilancio: Lettura e interpretazione (Vol. 2). (Torino: Giappichelli).
  79. Teodori C. and Veneziani M. (Eds.) (2013), L’evoluzione della disclosure nella sezione narrativa: L’impatto dei principi contabili internazionali e del processo di armonizzazione (Vol. 14). (Torino: Giappichelli).
  80. Thanos I. C. and Papadakis V. M. (2011), The use of accounting-based measures for measuring M&A performance: A review of five decades of research, Advances in Mergers and Acquisitions, 10, pp. 103-120, DOI: 10.1108/S1479-361X(2012)0000010009
  81. Trautwein F. (1990), Merger motives and merger prescriptions, Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), pp. 283-295,
  82. Tuch C. and O’Sullivan N. (2007), The impact of acquisitions on firm performance: A review of the evidence, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(2), pp. 141-170,
  83. Vasilaki A. (2011), Culture distance and cross-border acquisition performance: the moderating effect of transformational leadership, European Journal of International Management, 5(4), pp. 394-412, DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2011.040912
  84. Weber Y. (2013). A comprehensive guide to mergers & acquisitions: Managing the critical success factors across every stage of the M&A process. (FT Press).
  85. Yeh T. M. and Hoshino Y. (2002), Productivity and operating performance of Japanese merging firms: Keiretsu-related and independent mergers, Japan and the World Economy, 14(3), pp. 347-366, DOI: 10.1016/S0922-1425(01)00081-0
  86. Yuce A. and Ng A. (2005), Effects of private and public Canadian mergers, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 22(2), pp. 111-124,
  87. Zollo M. and Meier D. (2008), What is M&A performance?, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), pp. 55-77,
  88. Zollo M. and Singh H. (2004), Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: postacquisition strategies and integration capability in US bank mergers, Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), pp. 1233-1256,

Elisa Roncagliolo, Francesco Avallone, The complexity in measuring M&A performance: Is a multi-dimensional approach enough? in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2021, pp 89-117, DOI: 10.3280/FR2021-001004