Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users

Titolo Rivista MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ
Autori/Curatori Giovanna Magnani, Tommaso Bertolotti, Antonella Zucchella
Anno di pubblicazione 2018 Fascicolo 2018/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 24 P. 39-62 Dimensione file 1044 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2018-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In this paper, we analyze how car sharing is experienced by both active sharers and reluctant users. We integrate the consumer culture theory perspective with a cognitive approach to gain knowledge as to the cognitive aspects involved in the decision to use car sharing services. Through a phenomenographic design, we explore the different understandings of car sharing on a sample of Italian Millennials, interviewed either with a dedicated Focus Group or through in-depth individual interviews. Within our design, we employ what we call a "cognitive approach" to Focus Groups. We find three emerging understandings of car sharing and hypothesize that Millennials’ attitude towards the sharing economy may be affected by a mild extent of cognitive dissonance.

Keywords:Sharing, ownership, use, understandings, cognitive, phenomenography

  1. Shaheen S. (1999). Dynamics in behavioral adaptation to a transportation innovation: A case study of CarLink A smart carsharing system. UCD-ITS-RR-99-16. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
  2. Shaheen S. and Rodier C. (2005). Travel effects of a suburban commuter carsharing service: Carlink case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1927: 182-188. DOI: 10.3141/1927-21
  3. Arnould E.J. and Rose A.S. (2016). Mutuality critique and substitute for Belk’s sharing. Marketing Theory, 16: 75-99. DOI: 10.1177/1470593115572669
  4. Sherry J.F. JR, Kozinets R.V. and Borghini S. (2007). Agents in paradise. Experiential co-creation through emplacement, ritualization, and community. In: Carù A. and Cova B. (eds.). Consuming Experiences, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 17-33.
  5. Snare F. (1972). The concept of property. American Philosophical Quarterly, 9: 200-206. -- Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009439.
  6. Steg L. (2005). car use: lust and must. instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39: 147-162.
  7. Arnould E.J. and Thompson C.J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31: 868-882. DOI: 10.1086/426626
  8. Arthusson D. (2016). How millennials are defining the sharing economy. Entrepreneur June, 9, -- Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/275802.
  9. Ballús-Armet, I., Shaheen, S., Clonts, K. and Weinzimmer, D. (2014). Peer-to-peer carsharing: Exploring public perception and market characteristics in the San Francisco bay area, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416: 27-36. DOI: 10.3141/2416-04
  10. Bayton J.A. (1958). Motivation, cognition, learning-basic factors in consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 22: 282-289. DOI: 10.2307/1247119
  11. Bardhi F. and Eckhardt G.M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39: 881-898. DOI: 10.1086/666376
  12. Bardhi F., Eckhardt G.M., and Arnould E.J. (2012). Liquid relationship to possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39: 510-529. DOI: 10.1086/664037
  13. Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  14. Bartels D.M. and Johnson E.J. (2015). Connecting cognition and consumer choice. Cognition, 135: 47-51.
  15. Belk R.W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research. 15:39-168. DOI: 10.1086/432239
  16. Belk R.W. (2007). Why not share rather than own?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 611: 126-140. DOI: 10.1177/0002716206298483.
  17. Belk R.W. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36: 715-734. DOI: 10.1086/612649
  18. Belk R.W. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67: 1595-1600.
  19. Belk R.W., Ger G. and Askegaard S. (2000). The missing streetcar named desire. In: Mick D. G., Huffman C., Ratneshwar S., editors, The Why of Consumption, London: Routledge, pp. 98-119.
  20. Bertolotti T. and Magnani L. (2014). An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip-based knowledge. Synthese, 191: 4037-4067.
  21. Botsman R. and Rogers R. (2010). Beyond Zipcar: Collaborative consumption. Harvard Business Review, 88: 30.
  22. Cahill L. S. (2004). Bioethics and the Common Good. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press.
  23. Chen Y. (2009). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35: 925-940. DOI: 10.1086/593699
  24. Cooper J. (2007). Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory. London: Sage Publishing.
  25. Corciolani M. (2016). Fare e ricevere regali nella sharing economy. Teorie, comunità e pratiche di consume. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 33: 287-309. DOI: 10.7433/1094
  26. Daley M., and Rissel C. (2011). Perspectives and images of cycling as a barrier or facilitator of cycling. Transport policy, 18: 211-216.
  27. Delbosc A. and Currie G. (2013). Causes of youth licensing decline: A synthesis of evidence. Transport Reviews, 33: 271-290. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.801929
  28. Deneulin S. and Townsend N. (2006). Public goods, global public goods and the common good. Eesrc research group well-being in developing countries, wed working paper 18. – Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.493.9240&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  29. Dupré L. (1993). The common good and the open society. The Review of Politics, 55: 87-712.
  30. Dutzik T., Inglis J. and Baxandall P. (2014). Millennials in motion: Changing travel habits of young Americans and the implications for public policy. U.S. PIRG education fund and frontier group. -- Retrieved from http://uspirg.org/report/usp/millenials-motion.
  31. Efthymiou D., Antoniou C. and Waddell P. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers. Transport Policy, 29: 64-73.
  32. Festinger L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  33. Hamari J., Sjöklint M. and Ukkonen A. (2015). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67: 2047-2059.
  34. Hardin G. (1968). Tragedy of the commons. Science, 162: 1243-1248.
  35. Fisher R.J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20: 303-315. DOI: 10.1086/209351
  36. Garikapati V.M., Pendyala R.M., Morris E.A., Mokhtarian P.L., and Mcdonald M. (2016). Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: A generation in transition?. Transport Reviews, 36: 558-584. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1197337
  37. Hollenbach D. (2002). The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Kuhnimhof T., Armoogum J., Buehler R., Dargay J., Denstadli J.M. and Yamamoto T. (2012). Men shape a downward trend in car use among young adults-evidence from six industrialized countries. Transport Reviews, 32: 761-779. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2012.736426
  39. Kuhnimhof T., Buehler R., Wirtz M. and Kalinowska D. (2012). Travel trends among young adults in Germany: Increasing multimodality and declining car use for men. Journal of Transport Geography, 24: 443-450.
  40. Larsen G., Patterson M. and Markham L. (2014). A deviant art: Tattoo-related sigma in an era of commodification. Psychology and Marketing, 31: 670-681.
  41. Marcus G. (2008). Kluge: The Hazardous Construction of the Human Mind. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  42. Martin E., Shaheen S. and Lidicker J. (2010). Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: Results from north American shared-use vehicle survey. Transportation research record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143: 150-158. DOI: 10.3141/2143-19
  43. Marton F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought. 21: 28-49. -- Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42589189.
  44. Marton F. (2014). Necessary Conditions of Learning. New York: Routledge.
  45. Maslow A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.
  46. Mcdonald N.C. (2015). Are Millennials really the ‘go-nowhere’ generation?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81: 90-103. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1057196
  47. Möhlmann M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14: 193-207.
  48. Morency C., Trépanier M., Agard B., Martin B. and Quashie J. (2007). Car sharing system: What transaction datasets reveal on users’ behaviors. In: 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference proceedings (pp. 284-289), IEEE.
  49. O’Leary J., Sandberg J. (2017). Managers’ practice of managing diversity revealed: A practice theoretical account. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4): 512-536.
  50. Polzin S.E. and Chu X., Godfrey J. (2014). The impact of Millennials’ travel behavior on future personal vehicle travel. Energy Strategy Reviews, 5: 59-65.
  51. Osservatorio Sharing Mobility (2015). Rapporto Nazionale sulla Sharing Mobility. -- Retrieved from: http://osservatoriosharingmobility.it/.
  52. Samuelson P.A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36: 387-389. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01372-2_2
  53. Sandberg J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 9-25. DOI: 10.2307/1556383
  54. Sandberg J. (2005). How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches?. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 41-68. DOI: 10.1177/1094428104272000
  55. Schaefers T. (2013). Exploring carsharing usage motives: A hierarchical means-end Chain analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 47: 69-77.
  56. Schembri S. and Sandberg J. (2002). Service quality and the consumer’s experience: Towards an interpretive approach. Marketing Theory. 2: 189-205. DOI: 10.1177/147059310222003

  • 2021 IEEE 6th International Forum on Research and Technology for Society and Industry (RTSI) Ankit R. Patel, Flora Ferreira, Sergio Monteiro, Ana Carolina Silva, Wolfram Erlhagen, Estela Bicho, pp.194 (DOI:10.1109/RTSI50628.2021.9597265)
  • Lived experiences about car sharing in young adults: Emerging paradoxes Giovanna Magnani, Beatrice Re, in Italian Journal of Marketing /2020 pp.207
    DOI: 10.1007/s43039-020-00009-2
  • Identification of the Factors Affecting the Frequency of Online Shopping of Millennial and Post-Millennial consumers Richard Fedorko, Veronika Škerháková, Radovan Bačík, Viktória Ali Taha, Denis Tir, in GATR Journal of Business and Economics Review /2022 pp.40
    DOI: 10.35609/jber.2022.6.4(5)
  • Spare time use: profiles of Italian Millennials (beyond the media hype) Simone Del Sarto, Michela Gnaldi, in Statistical Methods & Applications /2022 pp.1403
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-022-00626-5
  • Sustainability and Shared Mobility Models Georgina Santos, in Sustainability /2018 pp.3194
    DOI: 10.3390/su10093194
  • Marketing in Culturally Distant Countries Giovanna Magnani, pp.63 (ISBN:978-3-031-04831-9)
  • Differences in the perceived financial risk factors between digital natives in the e-commerce Richard Fedorko, Veronika Skerhakova, Stela Markova, Radovan Bacík, Lubomir Fejercak, in Marketing and Management of Innovations /2021 pp.137
    DOI: 10.21272/mmi.2021.4-11

Giovanna Magnani, Tommaso Bertolotti, Antonella Zucchella, Cognitive aspects of car sharing in Millennials. Active sharers and reluctant users in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 1/2018, pp 39-62, DOI: 10.3280/MC2018-001004