Transiting in the prison institution: the experience of a civil discussion group

Journal title GRUPPI
Author/s Cristina Marogna, Floriana Caccamo, Massimo De Mari
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/2 Language Italian
Pages 17 P. 160-176 File size 172 KB
DOI 10.3280/GRU2016-002013
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper aims to investigate the role of the prison institution in protecting the individual from persecutory and depressive anxieties. Authors, in dealing with the discussion on institutional field that is created in the institution prison, emphasize the criterion of isomorphism between service offering and organizational models adopted. The phenomenology of the isomorphism considered from the point of view of the group allows us to observe how the group, compared with some specific images, fantasies and experiences brought by the individual, directly feel such mental events as their own and put in place as a reaction that is defensive and un-conscious.

Keywords: Prison, Isomorphism, Basic assumptions, Field institutional, Group, Mediating object.

  1. Balier C. (2005). Psychanalyse des comportements violents. Paris: Puf.
  2. Begoin-Guignard F. (1991). Identification projective et identité de groupe. Journal de la Psychanalyse de l’Enfant, 10: 23-45.
  3. Bion W. (1961). Esperienze nei gruppi. Roma: Armando Editore, 1971.
  4. Bion W. (1962). Apprendere dall’esperienza. Roma: Armando Editore, 1972.
  5. Bleger J. (1989). Psicoigiene e Psicologia istituzionale. Loreto: Ed. Lauretana.
  6. Carrà G., Giacobone C., Pozzi F., Alecci P. & Barale F. (2004). Prevalence of Mental Disorder and Related Treatments in a Local Jail: a 20-month Consecutive Case Study. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 13, 1: 47-54. DOI: 10.1017/S1121189X0000322
  7. Corbella S. (2003). Storie e luoghi del gruppo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  8. Correale A. (2007). Area traumatica e campo istituzionale. Roma: Borla.
  9. Enriquez E. (1992). L’organization en analyse. Paris: PUF.
  10. Fazel S., Cartwright J., Norman-Nott A. & Hawton K. (2008). Suicide in Prisoners: a Systematic Review of Risk Factors. J. of Clinical Psychiatry, 69: 1721-1731.
  11. Fazel S. & Danesh J. (2002). Serious Mental Disorder Among 23,000 Prisoners: Systematic Review of 62 Surveys. Lancet, 359: 545-550. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07740-
  12. Ferrario G., Campostrini F. e Polli C. (2005). Psicologia e carcere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Freud S. (1921). Psicologia delle masse e analisi dell’Io. OSF, 9. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  14. Goffman E. (1961). Asylums. Torino: Einaudi, 1968.
  15. Gussak D. (2007). The Effectiveness of Art Therapy in Reducing Depression in Prison Populations. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 4: 444-460. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X0629413
  16. Jaques E. (1966). Sistemi sociali come difesa contro l’ansia persecutoria e depressiva. In: Klein M., Heimman P. e Money-Kyrle R., a cura di, Nuove vie della psicoanalisi. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
  17. Kaës R. (1976). L’apparato pluripsichico: costruzioni del gruppo. Roma: Armando Editore, 1983.
  18. Kaës R. (2007). Un singolare plurale. Roma: Borla.
  19. Kafka F. (1925). Il processo. Torino: Einaudi, 1983.
  20. Kernberg O. (1998). Le relazioni nei gruppi. Ideologia, conflitto, leadership. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  21. Lewin K. (1951). Teoria e sperimentazione in psicologia sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  22. Lhuilier D. (2000). La santé en prison: permanence et changement. In: Veil C. e Lhuilier D., La prison en changement. Ramonville-Saint-Agne: Erès.
  23. McDougall J. (1920). A Note on Suggestion. Journal of Neurology and Psychopathology, 1, 1: 1-10.
  24. Milliken R. (2002). Dance/movement Therapy as a Creative Arts Therapy Approach in Prison to the Treatment of Violence. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 29: 203-206. DOI: 10.1016/S0197-4556(02)00151-X
  25. Milner M. (1987). La follia rimossa delle persone sane. Roma: Borla.
  26. Ministero della Giustizia (2005). “Osservazioni, inchieste e altre attività degli Uepe. Dati ripartiti per sesso”. Direzione generale di statistica.
  27. Morgan R.D., Kroner D.G. & Mills, J.F. (2006). Group Psychotherapy in Prison: Facilitating Change inside the Walls. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 36, 3: 137-144. DOI: 10.1007/BF0272905
  28. Neri C. (2011). Gruppo. Roma: Borla.
  29. Quinodoz J.M. (1992). La solitudine addomesticata. Roma: Borla.
  30. Ravit M. (2008). Construire sa peine: temporalité et travail psychique en prison, dans un groupe “Photolangage”. Bulletin de Psychologie, 1, 493: 63-70. DOI : 10.3917/bupsy.493.0063
  31. Sarchiapone M., Carli V., Giannantonio M. & Roy A. (2009). Risk Factors for Attempting Suicide in Prisoners. Suicide Life Threat Behaviour, 39, 3: 343-350.
  32. Schaller G., Zimmermann C. & Raymond L. (1996). Risk Factors in Self Injurious Behavior in a Swiss Prison. Sozial Praventivmedizin, 41: 249-256.
  33. Vacheret C. (2008). Foto, gruppo e cura psichica. Napoli: Liguori.
  34. Yalom I.D. & Leszcz M. (2005). Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
  35. Zagury D. (2001). Le psychiatre face aux expressions actuelles de la violence. Perspectives psychiatriques, 40, 3: 194-198.

Cristina Marogna, Floriana Caccamo, Massimo De Mari, Transitando nell’istituzione carceraria: l’esperienza di un gruppo di "discussione civile" in "GRUPPI" 2/2016, pp 160-176, DOI: 10.3280/GRU2016-002013