La formazione superiore dei professionisti dell’educazione e della formazione: dal modello disciplinarista al focus sui contenuti core

Journal title EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
Author/s Rossana Adele Rossi
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/1 Language English
Pages 16 P. 382-397 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ess1-2020oa9519
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Il contributo analizza le radici dell’approccio disciplinarista nell’alta formazione per passare alla considerazione dell’impatto dell’approccio funzionalista proprio delle politiche europee sulle trasformazioni in atto. Sono quindi richiamati i risultati di alcune delle più significative ricerche svolte in materia di obiettivi di apprendimento propri della formazione dei professionisti dell’educazione e della formazione. Il tentativo è di individuare i capisaldi di un approccio che consenta, a partire dal presente, di superare i limiti del disciplinarismo, garantendo l’acquisizione dei fondamenti della professione. La soluzione viene ricercata negli studi che tendono a definire i contenuti core della professionalità degli educatori e dei formatori e che spostano l’attenzione dall’insegnamento della disciplina ai learning outcomes conseguiti dagli studenti.

  1. Anvur (2016). Rapporto biennale sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca. Roma: Anvur.
  2. Biesta G. J. J., & Tedder M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency – as – achivement (Working Paper 5), Exeter, The Learning Lives Project.
  3. Bologna Communiqué (2005, May 19-20). The European Higher Education Area – Achieving the goals: Communiqué of the Conference of European Minsters Responsiblefor Higher Education. Bergen. Retrieved from http://www.bologna-bergen2005.noDocs/00-Main_doc/050520_Bergen_Communique.pdf.
  4. Boffo V. (2018). Employability and transitions: fostering the future of young adult graduates. In: V. Boffo, M. Fedeli, Employability & competences. Innovative curricula for new professions. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  5. Carr D. (2002). Making sense of education. An introduction to the philosophy and theory of education and teaching. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
  6. Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education (2015). Yerevan. http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2015_Yerevan/70/7/Yerevan-CommuniqueFinal_613707.pdf.
  7. Cedefop, The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2009). The shift to learning outcomes. Policies and practices in Europe. Luxembourg: Pubblication Office. Cedefop reference series, 105.
  8. Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education (2018), Paris. http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2018_Paris/77/1/EHEAParis2018_Communique_final_952771.pdf.
  9. Corbi E., Oliverio S. (2013). La deriva della ‘learnification’ e l’appello della Paideía. Oltre l’apprendimento ‘matematico’ e costruttivista. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica – Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 8(1). https://rpd.unibo.it/article/view/3778/3120.
  10. Del Gobbo G. (2018). Potentialities of “Professional socio-pedagogical educator” Course for QA’ improvement in L-19 bachelor degree in the frame of the Bologna Process. Form@re - Open Journal Per La Formazione in Rete, 18(3): 126-141.
  11. Ellis R., & Hogard E. (eds.) (2018). Handbook of quality assurance for University teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
  12. Fabbri L. (1998). Insegnanti allo specchio. Teorie e pratiche della programmazione. Roma: Armando.
  13. Federighi P. (2020). Adult Learning Statistical Country Report – Italy. A country report drawing on statistical data relating to participation in, and the financing of adult learning, Ecorys for European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Directorate E – Skills, Unit E.3 – VET, apprenticeships & adult. Functionalism in Sociology of Education, http://sociology.iresearchnet.com/sociologyof- education.
  14. Gaebel M., & Zhang T. (eds.) (2018). Trends 2018. Learning and teaching in the European Higher Education Area. Brussels: European University Association.
  15. Isco-08, Introductory and methodological notes. https://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/isco08/index.htm).
  16. Hashweh M. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: Twenty-five years later. In: C.J. Craig, P. C. Meijer & J. Broeckmans (eds.). From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: The evolution of a research community advances (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 19) (pp. 115-140). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  17. Shulman L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2): 4-11.
  18. Spence M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3): 355-374. DOI: 10.2307/1882010
  19. Timperley H. A. Wilson H. Barra & I. Fung. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Rossana Adele Rossi, La formazione superiore dei professionisti dell’educazione e della formazione: dal modello disciplinarista al focus sui contenuti core in "EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY" 1/2020, pp 382-397, DOI: 10.3280/ess1-2020oa9519