Training of teachers on ICT in Italy: A training proposal following the training model of Castilla y León (Spain)

Journal title EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Author/s Marta Sanz-Manzanedo, Fernando Lezcano-Barbero
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/2 Language Italian
Pages 0 P. File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa2-2020oa10813
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article presents the results obtained in a training experience to improve the self-perception of digital skills of a group of Italian teachers. For its implementation a training in b-learning mode has been designed using free tools that teachers can implement in the classroom. The course saw the participation of 12 teachers from a secondary school in Livorno and the results were very positive as they all had an improvement. The planning, not only focusing on the technological tools, but especially taking into account the activities that would have been carried out in the classroom, is one of the keys to the success of this type of proposal that could also have a positive impact on the pupils. In fact, after the implementation of this training, teachers have in their hands all the tools to be able to activate the virtual classrooms and teach their subject at a distance.

Keywords: digital competence; ICT; distance learning; teacher training; blended learning

  1. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  2. MIUR (2014). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) Guida alla lectura del Rapporto Internazionale OCSE. Consultato il 5 marzo 2018, da http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2014/TALIS_Guida_lettura_con_Focus_ITALIA.pdf.
  3. MIUR (2016). Piano per la formazione dei docenti 2016-2019. Consultato da http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2016/Piano_Formazione_3ott.pdf.
  4. MIUR (2018). Talis. Consultato il 5 marzo 2018, da http://hubmiur.pubblica.istruzione.it/web/ministero/talis.
  5. Navarro Asensio, E. (Coord.) (2017). Fundamentos de la investigación y la innovación educativa. Logroño: UNIR Editorial.
  6. ONTSI (2014). Claves para una cultura Tic en la Educación. Consultato da https://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/sites/ontsi/files/las_tic_en_el_aula.pdf.
  7. Pérez Escoda, A., & Rodríguez Conde, M. J. (2016). Evaluación de las competencias digitales autopercibidas del profesorado de Educación Primaria en Castilla y León (España). Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34(2), 399-415. DOI: 10.6018/rie.34.2.215121
  8. Petrucco, C., & Grion, V. (2015). An Exploratory Study on Perceptions and Use of Technology by Novice and Future Teachers. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 6(3), 50-64. DOI: 10.4018/IJDLDC.2015070104
  9. Puentedura, R. (2009). SAMR: A Contextualized Introduction. As We May Teach: Educational Technology, From Theory Into Practice.
  10. Romero, M. (2020). Herramientas y recursos imprescindibles para la docencia no presencial. Marc Romero | Webinar UOC - YouTube. Consultato il 14 maggio 2020, da https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZUefuJB6yo.
  11. Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37-64. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-015-9410-9
  12. Sansone, N., & Ligorio, M. (2016). Manuale di didattica blended: il modello della partecipazione collaborativa e costruttiva. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B., & Buglass, S. L. (2018). Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 13-22. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1190296
  14. Sansone, N., & Ritella, G. (2020). Formazione insegnanti “aumentata”: integrazione di metodologie e tecnologie al servizio di una didattica sociocostruttivista. Qwerty. Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 15(1), 70-88. DOI: 10.30557/QW000023
  15. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building and Knowledge Creation. En R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 397-417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.025
  16. Stewart, J., Antonenko, P., Robinson, J. S., & Mwavita, M. (2013). Intrapersonal Factors Affecting Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Agricultural Education Teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(3), 157-170. DOI: 10.5032/jae.2013.03157
  17. Wiggins, G. (2012). Feedback for Learning. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 10-16.
  18. Centro de Recursos y Form. del Profesorado en TIC. (s.f.). Consultato il 29 maggio 2018, da http://crfptic.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/.
  19. Centro Superior de Formación del Profesorado JCyL. (s.f.). Consultato il 29 maggio 2018, da http://csfp.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/index.cgi?wid_seccion=12&wid_item=50.
  20. Chen, B., & Hong, H.-Y. (2016). Schools as Knowledge-Building Organizations: Thirty Years of Design Research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266-288. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1175306
  21. Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative Research Designs. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264. DOI: 10.1177/0011000006287390
  22. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, G. A. (1997). Research Methodologies and the Doctoral Process. New Directions for Higher Education, 99, 33-46. DOI: 10.1002/he.9903
  23. De Santo, M., & De Meo, A. (2016). E-training for the clil teacher: E-tutoring and cooperation in a moodle-based community of learning. Journal of ELearning and Knowledge Society, 12(3), 41-49. DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829/1152
  24. Dirección General de Calidad Innovación y Formación del Profesorado. (2011). Modelo de competencias profesionales del profesorado. Consultato da http://csfp.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/upload/Modelo_de_competencias_profesionales_del_Asesor_de_formacion.pdf.
  25. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2017). Resumen del marco DigCompEdu. Consultato da https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/digcompedu_leaflet_esnov2017pdf.pdf.
  26. Falcinelli, F. & Laici, C. (2006). Esperienza di blended learning con Moodle nella SSIS Umbria. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 2(2), 241-254.
  27. Abella, V., López, C., Ortega, N., Sánchez, P., & Lezcano, F. (2011). Implantación de UBUVirtual en la Universidad de Burgos: evaluación y expectativas de uso. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (38), a184. DOI: 10.21556/edutec.2011.38.385
  28. Almås, A. G., & Krumsvik, R. (2007). Digitally literate teachers in leading edge schools in Norway. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(4), 479-497. DOI: 10.1080/13674580701687864
  29. Antonio, X., Sans-Martín, J., & Guardia-Olmos Triado, I. (2015). TALIS 2013 Estudio internacional de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Consultato da: https://www.mecd.gob.es/inee/dam/jcr:530e4938-f6c5-446c-937c-4c9df0a37481/talispublicacionessep2014.pdf.
  30. Belloch, C. (2014). Recursos Tecnologicos: TIC. Consultato il 15 maggio 2019, da https://www.uv.es/bellochc/pedagogia/EVA4.wiki?8.
  31. Cabero Almenara, J. (2015). Reflexiones educativas sobre las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC). Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 1, 19-27.
  32. Cabrera, N., & Mayordomo, M. R. (2016). El feedback formativo en la universidad Experiencias con el uso de la tecnología. Barcelona: LMI. Colección Transmedia XXI. Consultato da http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/155454/1/676494.pdf.
  33. Cappa, C., Niceforo, O., & Palomba, D. (2013). La formazione iniziale degli insegnanti in Italia. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, (22), 139-163. DOI: 10.5944/reec.22.2013.9327
  34. Centro de Formación del Profesorado en Idiomas. (s.f.). Consultato il 29 maggio 2018, da http://cfpidiomas.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/index.cgi?wid_seccion=1&wid_item=3.
  35. Farinelli, F. (2010). Competenze e opinioni degli insegnanti sull’introduzione delle TIC nella scuola italiana (No. BIS Working Paper No. 29). Consultato da https://www.fondazioneagnelli.it/wpcontent/uploads/2017/08/F._Farinelli__Competenze_e_opinioni_degli_insegnanti_sull_introduzione_delle_TIC_nella_scuola_italiana_-_FGA_WP29.pdf.
  36. Fernández Cruz, F., & Fernández Díaz, M. (2016). Los docentes de la Generación Z y sus competencias digitales. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, XXIV(46), 97-105. DOI: 10.3916/C46-2016-10
  37. Galliani, L. (2009). Formazione degli insegnanti e competenze nelle tecnologie della comunicazione educativa. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, 2-3(2-3), 93-104. Consultato da http://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/sird/article/view/312/301.
  38. Gijón González, A. J. (2011). Cómo llevar a cabo la formación permanente del profesorado en en un centro de formación e innovación educativa de Castilla y León: CFEIE de Segovia. Consultato da https://archivos.csif.es/archivos/andalucia/ensenanza/revistas/iee/Numero_47/ANTONIO_J_GIJON_1.pdf.
  39. Gisbert Cervera, M., González Martínez, J., & Esteve Mon, F. M. (2016). Competencia digital y competencia digital docente: una panorámica sobre el estado de la cuestión. Revista Interuniversitaria De Investigación En Tecnología Educativa, 0, 2529-9638. DOI: 10.6018/riite2016/257631
  40. Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536
  41. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77(1), 81-112. DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487
  42. Iglesias Alonso, C., & Lezcano Barbero, F. (2012). E-Colaboración entre docentes mediante herramientas TIC. Enseñanza & Teaching, 30(1), 115-135. Consultato da http://campus.usal.es/~revistas_trabajo/index.php/0212-5374/article/viewFile/9300/9592.
  43. Junta de Castilla y León. (2008). Modelo de formación del profesorado de Castilla y León. Consultato da http://csfp.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/upload/Modelo_Formacion_Profesorado_CyL.pdf.
  44. Krumsvik, R. (2008). The emerging digital literacy among teachers in Norway (the story of one digital literate teacher). En R. Kobayashi (Ed.). New Educational Technology (pp. 105-125). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  45. Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. DOI: 10.3102/0034654307309921
  46. Llorente, M. C. (2008). Aspectos fundamentales de la formación delprofes orado en TIC. Revista Pixel_Bit, 31, 121-130.
  47. Marquès, P. (2008). Las competencias digitales de los docentes. Consultato il 24 febbraio 2018, da http://peremarques.pangea.org/competenciasdigitales.htm.
  48. MECD. (2017). Marco Común de competencia Digital Docente. Intef. Consultato da http://aprende.educalab.es/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2017_1020_Marco-Común-de-Competencia-Digital-Docente.pdf.
  49. MECD. (2018). TALIS. Consultato il 5 marzo 2018, da https://www.mecd.gob.es/inee/evaluaciones-internacionales/talis.html.

Marta Sanz-Manzanedo, Fernando Lezcano-Barbero, Formazione degli insegnanti sulle TIC in Italia: una proposta formativa seguendo il modello formativo della Castiglia y León (Spagna) in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 2/2020, pp , DOI: 10.3280/exioa2-2020oa10813