Faculty Learning Communities and Communities of Practice for Faculty Development. The University of Genoa’s experience

Journal title EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Author/s Antonella Lotti
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/0 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 149-163 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa0-2021oa11133
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article offers an opportunity to reflect on what Faculty Learning Communities (FLC) and Communities of Practice (CoP) are within university contexts, with particular attention to groups of scholars who meet regularly to reflect on their teaching practices. The purpose of this paper is to define what Faculty Learning Communities and Community of Practice are, to illustrate their origins and characteristics, to describe some examples of FLC and CoP, to outline their theoretical framework, to report the University of Genoa’s experience about some Communities of Practice launched in 2017. Finally, some tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development will be described.

Keywords: Faculty Learning Communities; Community of Practice; Faculty Development

  1. Cox, M.D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. In M.D. Cox, New directions for teaching and learning, n. 97, (pp. 5-23). San Francisco: Wiley periodicals, Inc.
  2. De Carvalho-Filho, M.A., Tio, R.A., & Steinert, Y. (2020). Twelve tips for implementing a community of practice for faculty development. Medical Teacher, 42(2), 143-149.
  3. Engin, M., & Atkinson, F. (2015). Faculty Learning Communities: a model for supporting curriculum changes in Higher Education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(2), 164-174.
  4. Kolb, A. (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of Learning and Developing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  5. Lotti, A. (2020) L’esperienza del GLIA dell’Università di Genova. In A. Lotti & P.A. Lampugnani (a cura di). Faculty Development in Italia. Valorizzazione delle competenze didattiche dei docenti universitari. Genova: Genova University Press, pp. 205-217.
  6. Schreurs, M.L., Huveneers, W., & Dolmans, D. (2016). Communities of teaching practice in the workplace: Evaluation of a faculty development program. Medi-cal Teacher, 38(8), 808-14.
  7. Serrat, O. (2017). Surveying Communities of Practice. In O. Serrat, Knowledge Solutions. Singapore: Springer.
  8. Steinert, Y. (2010). Faculty Development: from workshops to communities of practice. Medical Teacher, 32(5), 425-428.
  9. Steinert, Y. (2014). Learning from experience: from workplace learning to communities of Practice. In Y. Steinert (Ed.). Faculty Development in the health professions. A focus on research and practice. New York: Springer.
  10. Yonge, O.J., & Davidson, S.J (2017). Promoting scholarship and faculty development through Faculty Learning Communities. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education – Avancées en formation infermière. 3(2), article 5.
  11. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice, Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (trad. it.: Comunità di Pratica. Apprendimento, significato e identità. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2006).
  12. Wenger, E., McDermott R., & Snyder W.M. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. (trad.it.: Coltivare le comunità di pratica. Prospettive ed esperienze di gestione della conoscenza. Milano: Guerini Next. 2013).

  • Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online Alessandra Romano, Loretta Fabbri, pp.254 (ISBN:978-3-031-29799-1)

Antonella Lotti, Faculty Learning Communities e Comunità di Pratica per lo sviluppo professionale del docente. L’esperienza dell’Università di Genova in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 0/2021, pp 149-163, DOI: 10.3280/exioa0-2021oa11133