Creative re-use for local participatory development. The case studies of OZ Officine Ze-ro and Project 33-Officina delle idee in Latium.

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Author/s Rossana Galdini, Silvia De Nardis
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/118 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 145-160 File size 460 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2019-118011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper proposes a reflection on innovative perspectives of city development, realized through urban re-use practices as re-functionalization and re-signification interventions of the urban voids. In this context, creativity becomes the central category to interpret the transfor-mations taking place in the contemporary city. The case studies of OZ Officine Zero and Pro-ject 33-Officina delle idee in Latium identify the potential for creative re-use, to implement a transversal network for social-economic and local development. In the institutions, this strate-gy can find a supporting role to satisfy the needs and aspirations of the territory.

Keywords: Creativity, re-use, local development, community, integrated planning, social inno-vation

  1. Appadurai A. (2013). The Future as Cultural Fact. London: Verso.
  2. Arvidsson A., Colleoni E. (2018). La solidarietà connettiva: co-working e la ricomposizione del lavoro creativo. Sociologia italiana, AIS Journal of Sociology, 11: 11-30. DOI: 10.1485/AIS_2018/11_3434158
  3. Bianchetti C., Sampieri A. (2014). Can shared practices build a new city? Journal of Architecture e and Urbanism, 38(1): 73-79. DOI: 10.3846/20297955.2014.89541
  4. Burgio G., Errigo M.F. (2017). Barcellona e Rotterdam creative cities. In Galdini R., Marata A. (a cura di). La città creativa. Spazi pubblici e luoghi della quotidianità. Roma: CNAPPC.
  5. Campagnoli G. (2014). Riusiamo l’Italia. Il Sole 24 Ore. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  6. Cellammare C. (a cura di). (2014). Roma città autoprodotta. Ricerca urbana e linguaggi artistici. Roma: Manifestolibri.
  7. Colomb C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: temporary uses of space, city, marketing and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal Of UrbanAffairs, 25.
  8. Cottino P., Zappatella P. (2009). Creatività, sfera pubblica e ruolo sociale degli spazi. Cittalia-Fondazione Anci Ricerche, 4 settembre.
  9. Evans G. (2001). Cultural Planning, an Urban Renaissance? London: Routledge.
  10. Evans G., Shaw P. (2004). The contribution of culture to regeneration in the Uk: a review of evidence. London: London Metropolitan University.
  11. Evans G. (2009). From cultural quarters to creative clusters - creative spaces in the new city economy. Stockholm: Institute of Urban History.
  12. Fidone G. (2017). Beni comuni e comunità: verso la definizione del modello. labsus.org/2017/08/beni-comuni-e-comunita-verso-la-definizione-del-modello/
  13. Freschi, Maas (2017). Adaptive Reuse. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  14. Galdini R. (2016). Il riuso come strumento di sviluppo urbano: ridefinizione delle qualità spaziali ed esiti economico-sociali. Rivista online di Urban@it - 2/2016
  15. Galdini R. (2017). Terapie urbane. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  16. Harvey D. (2013). Le città ribelli. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
  17. Hein M.F., Houck K.D. (2008). Construction challenges of adaptive reuse of historical buildings in Europe. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 4(2), 115–131. DOI: 10.1080/1557877080222946
  18. Inti I. (2010). Temporary reuse: a call for possible Italian public policies. Multiplicity, DiAP, Politecnico di Milano: Multiplicity, DiAP.
  19. Landry C. (2000). The creative city. A toolkit for urban innovation. London: Earthscan.
  20. Mehrotra R. (2008). Negotiating the static and kinetic cities: The emergent urbanism of Mumbai. Other worlds, urban imaginaries in a globalizing age. Ed. Andreas Huyssen. Duke University Press.
  21. Montanari F., Mizzau L. (2015). Laboratori urbani. Organizzare la rigenerazione urbana attraverso la cultura e l’innovazione sociale. Quaderni della Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini, ottobre.
  22. Montanari F. (2018). Ecosistema creativo. Organizzazione della creatività in una prospettiva di network. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  23. Moulaert F., Martinelli F., Swyngedouw E., Gonzalez S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 11: 1969-1990.
  24. Moretti E. (2013). The new geography of jobs. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  25. Orbasli A. (2009). Re-using existing buildings towards sustainable re generation. -- http://www.aylinorbasli.com/Resources/Reuse%20and%20sustainability%20Orbasli.pdf
  26. Oswalt P. (2013). ​Urban catalyst. Berlin: DOM Publishers, 28.
  27. Oswalt P., Overmeyer P., Misselwitz P. (2013). Urban catalyst. Mit zwischennutzungen stadt entwickeln. Berlin: Dom Publishers.
  28. Perrone C. (2017). Il “farsi” delle città. Sentieri Urbani, 21, 10 ottobre.
  29. Plevoets B., van Cleempoel K. (2011). Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: a literature review. Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture 12. (Ed.) Brebbia C., Binda L. Chianciano Terme: WIT Press.
  30. Robiglio M. (2016). The adaptive reuse toolkit. How cities can turn their industrial legacy into infrastructure for innovation and growth. An Urban and Regional Policy paper, 38.
  31. Sgaraglio F. (2015). Prefazione. In Montanari F., Mizzau L. (a cura di). Laboratori urbani. Quaderni, Fondazione G. Brodolini, Studi e ricerche 51, ottobre: 9-10.
  32. Smallwood C. (2012). The role of adaptive (re)use. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012-North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  33. Spataro D. (2016). Against a de-politicized DIY urbanism: Food Not Bombs and the struggle over public space. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9 (2): 185-201. DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2015.105620
  34. Thornton B. J. (2011). The greenest building (is the one that you don’t build!): effective techniques for sustainable adaptive reuse. Journal of Green Building, 6(1): 1-7.
  35. Tonkiss F. (2013). Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city. -- http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ccit20/current. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2013.79533
  36. Vitale T. (2014). Socialità, mobilitazione e innovazione sociale nelle città europee. Amendola G. (a cura di). Il dire e il fare: volontari creativi per il bene comune. Milano: Bine
  37. Wong L. (2017). Adaptive reuse extending the lives of buildings. Basilea: Birkhauser Verlag.

  • Urban informality and users-led social innovation: Challenges and opportunities for the future human centred city Rossana Galdini, Silvia De Nardis, in Futures 103170/2023 pp.103170
    DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103170

Rossana Galdini, Silvia De Nardis, Il riuso creativo per uno sviluppo locale partecipato. I casi di Officine zero e dell’Officina delle idee nel Lazio in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 118/2019, pp 145-160, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2019-118011