Mathematics and Rhetoric
Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Cesare Cozzo
Publishing Year 2011 Issue 2011/3 Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 59-72 File size 518 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2011-003005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The traditional opposition between mathematical proof and rhetorical argument is based on a non-contextual picture of mathematical proof, against which historical and theoretical objections have been raised. The author advocates a different opposition, between epistemic rhetoric and instrumental rhetoric. Instrumental rhetoric aims at persuasion without caring for truth. Epistemic rhetoric is a practice aimed at both persuasion and truth. Aiming at truth is a way of acting, which can be characterized in terms of epistemically virtuous behavioural traits. In this sense epistemic rhetoric aims at truth, even though it is contextual and addressed to a particular audience. Real life mathematical proofs are instances of epistemic rhetoric and contextual rigour. But it is right to contrast proofs with the arguments of instrumental rhetoric.
Keywords: Aiming-at-truth, Epistemic virtues, Mathematical proof, Rhetorical argument
Cesare Cozzo, Matematica e retorica in "PARADIGMI" 3/2011, pp 59-72, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2011-003005