The return of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction
Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Robert Hanna
Publishing Year 2012 Issue 2012/1 Language English
Pages 50 P. 19-68 File size 198 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2012-001002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Without a doubt, the greatest urban legend of contemporary philosophy is the beliefthat Quine refuted the A-S distinction in the Two Dogmas of the Empiricism in1951. The central claim of this essay is that the right theory of mental content and humanrationality on the one hand, and the analytic-synthetic distinction on the other,are explanatorily complementary, mutually supporting, and jointly cogent. One veryimportant further consequence of this Kantian theory is that it demonstrates that thereare in fact no such things as necessary a posteriori statements or contingent a prioristatements, contrary to popular post-Quinean belief. So Kant was right, Quine waswrong, and perhaps even more surprisingly, Kripke was wrong too.
Keywords: Analytic-Synthetic, Apriori, Kant, Kripke, Necessary, Quine.
- Is Kant’s Metaphysics Profoundly Unsatisfactory? Critical Discussion of A. W. Moore’s Critique of Kant Sorin Baiasu, in Kantian Review /2016 pp.465
DOI: 10.1017/S1369415416000194
Robert Hanna, The return of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction in "PARADIGMI" 1/2012, pp 19-68, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2012-001002