Beyond the public/private dichotomy. Verbal voyeurism as a form of social cohesion and interaction

Journal title RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE
Author/s Anna Maria Paola Toti
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1 Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 107-120 File size 870 KB
DOI 10.3280/SA2014-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Backbiting, gossiping and nattering are social practices, collective behaviors, tranche de vie which describe a certain socio- historical context and mentality and which go beyond the dichotomy public/ private. These social phenomena are to all intents and purposes forms of verbal voyeurism; they are universal pulsions and a sort of discursive intrusion through which the private sphere becomes part of the public one. The study and analysis of the flow of verbal communication is extremely important for the social sciences because it favors the understanding of the hidden tissues of intersubjective relationships and the articulate reconstruction of the different forms of backbiting with their tight connection to social reality and daily life.

Keywords: Social interaction, collective behavior, public opinion

  1. Adorno T.W. (1951). Minima moralia. Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Frankfurta, M.: Surkamp
  2. (trad. it. Minima moralia. Meditazioni della vita offesa. Torino: Einaudi, 1954).
  3. Allport G.W., Postman L.J. (1945). The Basic Psychology of Rumor. Transaction of the New York
  4. Academy of Science, issue 2, series II, (8): 61-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1945.tb00216.x
  5. Allport G.W., Postman L.J. (1946-1947). An Analysis of Rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly, 10, (4):
  6. 501-517. DOI: 10.1093/poq/10.4.501
  7. Allport G.W., Postman L.J. (1947). The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Henry Holt.
  8. Aromatario P. (2013). La maldicenza. Dire il mare e dire male. L’Aquila: One Group Edizioni.
  9. Bachtin M. (1953-1954). Problema rečevych žanrov. In: Sobranie sočinenij, T. 5, Raboty 1940ch –
  10. načala 1960ch godov. Gogotišvili, Moskva: Russkie slovari (trad. it. Il problema dei generi del
  11. discorso. In: L’autore e l’eroe. Teoria letteraria e scienze umane, Torino: Einaudi, 1988).
  12. Bachtin M. (1965). Творчество Франсуа Рабле и народная культура Средневековья и Ренессанса.
  13. Москва: Художественная литература (trad. it. L’opera di Rabelais e la cultura popolare. Torino:
  14. Einaudi, 1979).
  15. Barthes R. (1980). La chambre claire. Note sur la photographie. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it. La camera
  16. chiara. Note sulla fotografia. Torino: Einaudi, 1980).
  17. Benvenuto S. (2000). Dicerie e pettegolezzi. Bologna: il Mulino.
  18. Bernardini S. (2006). Critica della ragione filosofica. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  19. Bloch M. (1921). Réflexions d’un historien sur les fausses nouvelles de la guerre. Revue de Synthèse
  20. Historique, XXXIII: 97-99 (trad. it. La guerra e le false notizie. Roma: Donzelli, 1994).
  21. Bloch M. (1924). Les Rois thaumaturges. Etude sur le caractère surnaturel attribué à la puissance royale, particulièrement en France et en Angleterre. Strasbourg: Librairie Istra.
  22. Borges J.L. (1936). El arte de Injuriar. En: Historia de la eternidad. Buenos Aires: Viau y zona (trad. it. Storia dell’eternità. Milano: Mondadori, 1999).
  23. Brunvard J.H. (1980). Urban Legends: Folklore for Today. Psichology Today, june, 13: 50-62.
  24. Brunvard J.H. (1981). The Vanishing Hitchhiker American Urban Legends and their Meaning. New York: Norton.
  25. Ciampi M. (2011). Forme dell’abitare. Un’analisi sociologica dello spazio borghese. Soveria-Manelli: Rubbettino.
  26. Darnton R. (2003). George Washington’s False Teeth. An Unconventional Guide to the Eighteenth Century. New York: Norton (trad. it. L’età dell’informazione. Una guida non convenzionale al Settecento. Milano: Adelphi, 2007).
  27. Dorson R. M (1959). American folklore. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
  28. Elias N. (1985). Remarques sur le commèrage. Actes de la recherche en Sciences Sociales, 60: 23-29. DOI: 10.3406/arss.1985.2285
  29. Ferrarotti F. (1994). Pettegolezzo grande risorsa. Sole 24 Ore, 5 giugno, p. 23.
  30. Gallino L. (2004). Dizionario di Sociologia. Torino: Utet. Habermas J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Neuwied: Herman Luchterhand Verlag (trad. it. Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2011).
  31. Habermas J. (1981). Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp (trad. it. Teoria dell’agire comunicativo. Bologna: il Mulino, 1986).
  32. Heidegger M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Halle: Niemeyer (trad. it. Essere e tempo. Milano: Longanesi, 1976).
  33. Kant I. (1784). Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? Berlinische Monatsschrift, pp. 481-94 (trad. it. Scritti politici. Torino: Utet, 1965).
  34. Kapferer J.N. (1987). Rumeurs. Le plus vieux média du mond. Paris: Editions du Seuil (trad. it. Rumors. I più antichi media del mondo. Roma: Armando, 2012).
  35. Levi P. (1990). Del pettegolezzo. In: Opere. Torino: Einaudi.
  36. Livolsi M., Volli U., a cura di (2005). Rumor e pettegolezzi. L’importanza della comunicazione informale. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  37. Morin E. (1969). La Rumeur d’Orléans. Paris: Edition du Seuil (trad. it. Medioevo moderno a Orléans. Roma: ERI, 1979).
  38. Paine R. (1967). What is: Gossip About? An Alternative Hypothesis. Man New Series, 2 (2): 278-285.
  39. Radin P. (1927). Primitive Man An Philosopher. New York and London: Appetlon and Co.
  40. Sbisà M. (1998). La chiacchiera e il paradigma della relazionalità. Versus, 78 (31): 23-77.
  41. Tarde G. (1901). L’opinion et la foule. Paris: Felix Alcan.
  42. Toselli P. (1991). Tutte storie. Centro Raccolta delle Voci e Leggende metropolitane, anno 1, n. 1.
  43. Wittgenstein L. (1967). Bemerkungen über Frazers. The Golden Bough. Synthese, vol. 17, 1: 233-253 (trad. it. Note sul ramo d’oro di Frazer, Milano: Adelphi 1975). DOI: 10.1007/BF00485029

Anna Maria Paola Toti, Oltre la dicotomia pubblico/privato. Forme di voyeurismo verbale tra interazione e coesione sociale in "RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE" 1/2014, pp 107-120, DOI: 10.3280/SA2014-001005