Market and policy shocks in economic systems: interrelated dynamics in the sustainability transition

Journal title ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Author/s Massimiliano Mazzanti
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2014/2 Language English
Pages 12 P. 153-164 File size 243 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2014-002008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This note addresses the issue of market and policy shocks in the transition to sustainability. Market Shocks may be driven by price volatility; policy shocks are likely to occur either given contingent conditions of policy feasibility - a concept that shifts over time - or in reaction to extreme climatic events. The paper questions the role of ‘events’ as drivers of change, with a focus on innovation responses. In doing so, it broadens the perspective on environmental policy’s role and effects. Environmental policy is connected to institutional and market dynamics. It is not limited to the Pigovian rationale - the mere minimization of current costs - but rather tied to a ‘standard and cost approach’ which attempts to incorporate efficiency concepts in a dynamic scenario, where learning and adaptation through technological and behavioral changes are crucial.

Keywords: Shocks, environmental performances, dynamics, policy

Jel codes: O1, Q5

  1. Borghesi S., Costantini V., Crespi F., Mazzanti M. (2013). Environmental Innovation and socio economic dynamics in institutional and policy contexts. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, i-first.
  2. Borghesi S. (2011). The European emission trading scheme and renewable energy policies: credible targets for incredible results? International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 3(3), 312-327.
  3. Chichilnisky G. (2013). Modelling growth and socio ecological transitions – chances and challenges, Public WWWfor Europe project lecture, Wien, March 12th, 2013.
  4. Chichilnisky G., Eisenberger P. (2009). Energy security, economic development and global warming: addressing short and long term challenges. International Journal of Green Economics, 3(3), 414-446, January.
  5. Costantini V., Mazzanti M. (2012). On the green side of trade competitiveness? Research Policy, February, 41, 2.
  6. Costantini V., Mazzanti M. (2013). The Dynamics of Economic and Environmental Systems. Innovation, Policy and Competitiveness. Springer.
  7. Edenhofer O., Stern N. (2009). Towards a global green recovery, PDI/LSE Report .
  8. EEA (2013a). Achieving energy efficiency through behaviour change: what does it take?. EEA, Copenhagen.
  9. EEA (2013b). Towards a green economy in the EU, Copenhagen, European Environment Agency.
  10. Lehtonen M. (2004). The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions Ecological Economics, 49, 2, 1, 199-214.
  11. Marin G., Mazzanti M. (2013). The evolution of environmental and labour productivity dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, i-first.
  12. Mazzanti M., Musolesi M. (2013). Breaking environmental Kuznets curves, Working paper INRA Grenoble.
  13. Mazzanti M., Musolesi A. (2014). Non linearity, heterogeneity and unobserved effects in the CO2 income relation for advanced countries. Studies in non linear Dynamics and Econometrics, forth (available as FEEM working paper 91/2013).
  14. Mazzanti M., Zoboli R. (2009). Environmental efficiency and labour productivity: trade-off or joint dynamics?, Ecological Economics, 68, 4, 1182-94.
  15. Mazzucato M. (2012). The Entrepreneurial state Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, Anthem Other Canon Economics.
  16. OECD (2002). Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. OECD, Paris.
  17. Pearce (2004). The social costs of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford review of economic Policy, 19, 3.
  18. Putnam R. (2001). Bowling alone. Simon & Schuster. Rotmans J. (2013). Modelling growth and socio ecological transitions – chances and challenges, Public WWWfor Europe project lecture, Wien, March 12th, 2013.
  19. Silverberg G., Verspagen B. (2007). The size distribution of innovations. The Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 671-693.
  20. Van den Bergh J. (2011). Environment versus growth - A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth”.
  21. Ecological Economics, 70, 5, 15 March, 881-890.
  22. Van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. (2013). Policies to enhance economic feasibility of a sustainable energy transition. PNAS, 110, 2436-2437, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1221894110
  23. Van den Bergh J. (2010). Externality or sustainability economics? Ecological Economics, 69, 11, 2047-2052.
  24. Vogt-Schilb A., Hallefatte S. (2013). Marginal Abatement Cost Curves and the Optimal Timing of Mitigation Measures, FEEM nota di lavoro 89, FEEM, Milan.

Massimiliano Mazzanti, Market and policy shocks in economic systems: interrelated dynamics in the sustainability transition in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2014, pp 153-164, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2014-002008