Gli inizi di una metodologia della scoperta. L’emergere di un aspetto naturalistico della logica

Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Mirella Capozzi
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/2 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 45-59 File size 83 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2015-002005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Between the 16th and the 17th centuries the stress put on natural logic and language by Renaissance logicians, Descartes’ inquiry on the cognitive sources of the certainty of inferences, and Locke’s insistence on the connection between logic and the workings of the mind, were often motivated by the inadequacy of the syllogism as a means of discovery. Also Leibniz and, later on, Lambert - both taking advantage of the cognitive contribution of sensibility in dealing with the signs of their logical calculi - favored heuristic methods that, partly inspired by Bacon, used mnemonic/inventive tools such as topoi, formerly devised for persuasive arguments ranging in the field of rhetorical probability. This was not intended as a retreat to a natural naïve logic, but as the promotion of a naturalized logic attentive to the way humans think, and capable of running the risk of error.

Keywords: Agricola, Descartes, heuristics, Lambert, Leibniz, Locke, naturality of logic.

  1. Agricola R. (1528). De inventione dialectica libri tres, cum scholiis Ioannis Matthaei Phrissemii. s.l. (Coloniae). Seconda edizione a cura di F. Birckmann, con Vorwort di W. Risse. Hildesheim-New York: Olms, 1976.
  2. Ashworth E.J. (1974). Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.
  3. Ashworth E.J. (1985). Editor’s Introduction. In: Sanderson R., Logicae Artis Compendium, II ed., Oxoniae: Lichfield and Short, riprod. Bologna: CLUEB.
  4. Ashworth E. J. (2008). Developments in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries. In: Gabbay D.M. and Woods J., eds., Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 2 Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 609-644.
  5. Bacon F. (1857-74). The Works of Francis Bacon. 14 vols. Ed. by J. Spedding, R.L. Ellis and D.D. Heath. London: Longman.
  6. Bacone F. (1975). Scritti filosofici. A cura di P. Rossi. Torino: UTET.
  7. Black M. (1983). Modelli archetipi metafore. Parma: Pratiche.
  8. Borghero C. (1983). La certezza e la storia. Cartesianesimo, pirronismo e conoscenza storica. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  9. Boethius S. (1860). In Topica Ciceronis commentariorum libri sex. In: Migne J.P. Patrologia latina, vol. LXIV. Paris.
  10. Breger H. (2008). The Art of Mathematical Rationality. In: Dascal M., ed., Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? Berlin: Springer: 141-152.
  11. Buickerood J.G. (1985.) The Natural History of the Understanding: Locke and the Rise of Facultative Logic in the Eighteenth Century. History and Philosophy of Logic, 6: 157-190.
  12. Capozzi M. (2002). Kant e la logica, vol. I. Napoli: Bibliopolis. Capozzi M. (2006). Kant on Heuristics as a Desirable Addition to Logic. In: Cellucci C. and Pecere P., eds., Demonstrative and Non-Demonstrative Reasoning in Mathematics and Natural Science. Cassino: Edizioni dell’Università di Cassino: 123-181.
  13. Capozzi M. (2010). Logica e retorica. Separazione di campi e motivi di continuità fra Seicento e Settecento. In: Gagliasso E. e Frezza G., a cura di. Metafore del vivente. Linguaggi e ricerca scientifica tra filosofia, bios e psiche. Milano: Franco Angeli: 113-122.
  14. Capozzi M. (2011a). Calcoli simbolici e metodi inventivi. In: Ballo E. and Cellucci C., a cura di. La ricerca logica in Italia. Studi in onore di Corrado Mangione. Milano: Cisalpino: 229-246.
  15. Capozzi M. (2011b). The Cognitive Importance of Sight and Hearing in Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Logic. In: Cellucci C., Grosholz E. and Ippoliti E., eds., Logic and Knowledge. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing: 3-25.
  16. Capozzi M. and Roncaglia G. (2009). Logic and Philosophy of Logic from Humanism to Kant. In: Haaparanta L., ed., The Development of Modern Logic. New York: Oxford University Press: 78-158.
  17. Carruthers M.J. (1990). The Book of Memory. A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Cartesio (1986). Opere filosofiche, vol. I. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  19. Dascal M. (1987). Leibniz, Language, Signs and Thought: A Collection of Critical Essays. Amsterdam-Philadephia: Benjamins.
  20. Daston L. (1988). Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  21. Daston, L. (1998). Probability and Evidence. In: Garber D. and Ayers M.R., eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1108-1144.
  22. Dawson H. (2007). Locke, Language, and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. de la Ramée P. (1555). Dialectique. Paris: A. Wechel.
  24. Descartes R. (1964-76). Oeuvres de Descartes. Éd. par C. Adam et P. Tannery. Paris: Vrin.
  25. Gaukroger S. (1989). Cartesian Logic: an Essay on Descartes’s Conception of Inference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  26. Hacking I. (2006). The Emergence of Probability, II ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Jardine L. (1974). Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Jardine L. (1988). Humanistic Logic. In: Schmitt C.B., Skinner Q. and Kessler E., eds., The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 173-198.
  29. Krämer S. (1991). Berechenbare Vernunft. Kalkül und Rationalismus im 17 Jahrhundert. Berlin-New York: de Gruyter.
  30. Krämer S. (1999). Gibt es eine Sprache hinter dem Sprechen? In: Wiegand H.E., Hrsg., Sprache und Sprechen in den Wissenschaften. Geschichte und Gegenwart. Berlin-New York: de Gruyter: 372-403.
  31. Kusukawa S. (1996). Bacon’s Classification of Knowledge. In: Peltonen M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Bacon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 47-74.
  32. Lambert J.H. (1965-). Philosophische Schriften. Hrsg. von H.W. Arndt. Hildesheim: Olms.
  33. Leibniz G.W. (1860). Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff. Hrsg. Von C.I Gerhardt. Halle. Riprod. Hildesheim-New York: Olms 1971.
  34. Leibniz G.W. (1875-90). Die philosophischen Schriften, 7 voll. Hrsg von C.I. Gerhardt. Berlin. Riprod. Hildesheim: Olms, 1960-1961.
  35. Leibniz G.W. (1992). Scritti di logica, II ed. a cura di F. Barone. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  36. Locke J. (1690). An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Ed. by P.H. Nidditch
  37. (IV ed. 1700). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975 (trad. it. di C. Pellizzi, riv. G. Farina: Saggio sull’intelligenza umana. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1988).
  38. Locke J. (1706). Of the Conduct of the Understanding. In: King P. and Collins A., eds., Posthumous Works of Mr. John Locke. London: Churchill.
  39. Mack P. (1993). Renaissance Argument. Valla and Agricola in the Traditions of Rhetoric and Dialectic. Leiden: Brill.
  40. Mack P. (2011). A History of Renaissance Rhetoric 1380-1620. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
  41. Maierù A. (1993). La dialettica. In: Cavallo G., Leonardi C. e Menestò E., a cura di. Lo spazio letterario del medioevo. 1. Il medioevo latino, vol. I, t. II. Roma: Salerno Editrice: 273-294.
  42. Moss A. (1993). Commonplace-Rhetoric and Thought-Patterns in Early Modern Culture. In: Roberts R.H. and Good J.M.M., eds., The Recovery of Rhetoric: Persuasive Discourse and Disciplinarity in the Human Sciences. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press: 49-60.
  43. Nauta L. (2007). Lorenzo Valla and the Rise of Humanist Dialectic. In: Hankins J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 193-210.
  44. Nauta L. (2009). In Defense of Common Sense. Lorenzo Valla’s Humanist Critique of Scholastic Philosophy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  45. Nuchelmans G. (1998). Logic in the Seventeenth Century: Preliminary Remarks and the Constituents of the Proposition. In: Garber D. and Ayers M., eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 103-117.
  46. Ong W. (1983). Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue (I ed. 1958). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  47. Rescher N. (1977). Dialectics. A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany: SUNY Press.
  48. Risse W. (1964-70). Die Logik der Neuzeit, 2 voll. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann.
  49. Rossi P. (1974). Francesco Bacone. Dalla magia alla scienza. Bologna: il Mulino. Rossi P. (1983). Clavis universalis. Arti della memoria e logica combinatoria da Lullo a Leibniz. Bologna: il Mulino.
  50. Sargent R.M. (2002). Francis Bacon and the Humanistic Aspects of Modernity. In: French P.A., Wettstein H. and Silver B., eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Renaissance and Early Modern Philosophy. vol. 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 124-139.
  51. Semler C.A. (1822). Versuch über die combinatorische Methode. Ein Beytrag zur angewandten Logik und allgemeinen Methodik, II ed. Dresden: in der Waltherschen Hofbuchhandlung (I ed. Leipzig, 1811).
  52. Scholz H. (1983). Storia della logica. Trad. di E. Melandri; Introduzione di C. Cellucci. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  53. Schuurman P. (2000). Introduction. In: Schuurman P., ed. Of the Conduct of the Understanding by John Locke. Utrecht: Typographica Academica Traiectina: 15-126.
  54. Skinner Q. (1996). Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  55. Spranzi M. (2011). The Art of Dialectic between Dialogue and Rhetoric. The Aristotelian Tradition. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  56. Vasoli C. (1968). La dialettica e la retorica dell’Umanesimo. “Invenzione” e “Metodo”' nella cultura del XV e XVI secolo. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  57. Vives J.L. (1520). Adversus pseudodialecticos. Eiusdem Pompeius fugiens. In:
  58. Vives J.L. (1979). Against the pseudodialectitians. A Humanist Attack on Medieval Logic. Ed. by R. Guerlac. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  59. Yolton J.W. (1955). Locke and the Seventeenth-Century Logic of Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas, 16: 431-452.

Mirella Capozzi, Gli inizi di una metodologia della scoperta. L’emergere di un aspetto naturalistico della logica in "PARADIGMI" 2/2015, pp 45-59, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2015-002005