Social media and family bonds: towards overcoming the dichotomy between real and digital world

Journal title RIVISTA DI PSICOTERAPIA RELAZIONALE
Author/s Marta Di Grado, Aurora Boison, Margherita Tata, Virginia Tamborini
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/45 Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 68-81 File size 189 KB
DOI 10.3280/PR2017-045004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The work deals with social media according to a systemic perspective: it is examined how they have influenced young people and their relationships inside and outside the family, which has to engage in a mediation role. To overcome a demonization perspective, it is assumed that the use of these channels is not negative itself: the effects are mediated by values and modalities of each one. The authors focus on the potential of the media: they can increase family connection and pro-social behavior and respond to critical needs of young people (autonomy, identity and intimacy). Finally, negative effects are not ignored, as the dependence, the repercussions of the overexposure for a developing brain and the destructive effects on body image, sexuality and aggression. Finally the paradoxical aspects of social media are discussed, including the "pre-eighteenth".

Keywords: Social media, family, bonds, mediation, identity, sexuality, paradox.

  1. Aroldi P. (2015). Famiglie connesse. Social Network e relazioni familiari online. Media Education. 6: 1-17.
  2. Bartholomew M.K., Schoppe-Sullivan S.J., Glassman M., Kamp Dush C.M., Sulli-van J.M. (2012). New Parents’ Facebook Use at the Transition to Parenthood . Family relations, 61: 455-469.
  3. Brandtzæg P.B., Heim J., Kaare B.H. (2010). Bridging and bonding in socialnet-work sites. Investigating family-based capital. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 6: 231-253.
  4. Coyne S.M., Padilla-Walker L.M, Howard E. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: a decade review of media use, effects and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Society for the study of emerging adulthood, 1: 125-137. DOI: 10.1177/216769681347978
  5. Coyne S.M., Padilla-Walker L.M., Fraser A.M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61: 426-440.
  6. Denham J. (2016). Finding Dory may not feature Disney's first same-sex couple after all. The Indipendent. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.independent.co. uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/finding-dory-may-not-feature-disneys-first-same-sex-couple-after-all-a7072596.html [data di consultazione: 10-06-2016].
  7. Deriu M., Filomia M. (2015). Famiglia e nuovi media. I nativi digitali e i loro ge-nitori. Milano: San Paolo.
  8. Díaz Bohórquez J.C. (2015). Come evitare che i nostri figli cadano nella trappola del Grooming. Family and media. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://www. familyandmedia.eu/it/argomenti/associazioni/364-come-evitare-che-i-nostri-figli-cadano-nella-trappola-del-grooming.html [data di consultazione: 10-06-2016].
  9. Georgiou M. (2006). Diaspora, identity and the media: diasporic transnationalism and mediated spatialities. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
  10. Giaccardi G. (2016). Intervento sulle comunicazioni e le relazioni umane, Conve-gno sui Social Media per Missionari Saveriani, Tavernerio, 17-30 gennaio.
  11. Greco G. (a cura di) (2014). Pubbliche intimità. L’affettivo quotidiano nei siti di social Network. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  12. Griffiths M. (2000). Does Internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3: 211–218. DOI: 10.1089/10949310031606
  13. Kaare B.H., Brandtzaeg P.B., Heim J., Endestad T. (2007). In the borderland be-tween family orientation and peer culture: the use of communication technolo-gies among Norwegian tweens, New Media & Society, 9: 603-624. DOI: 10.1177/146144480708032
  14. Kuss D.J., Griffiths M.D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction ‒ A review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8: 3528–3552.
  15. Mascheroni G. (2012). I ragazzi e la rete. La ricerca UE Kids Online e il caso Ita-lia. Brescia: La Scuola.
  16. Nathan D., Shukla L., Kandasamy A., Benegal V. (2016). Facebook Role Play Addiction – A Comorbidity with Multiple Compulsive ‒ Impulsive Spectrum Disorders. Journal of behavioral addictions, 5: 1-5. DOI: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.02
  17. Scabini E., Rossi G. (2013). Famiglia e nuovi media. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  18. Spada, M. (2014). An overview of problematic Internet use. Addictive Behaviors, 39: 3–6.
  19. Regalia C., Manzi C. (2013). La sfida dei social network per l’identità familiare. In Scabini E. e Rossi G. (a cura di) Famiglia e nuovi media. Milano: Vita e Pen-siero, pp. 105-125.
  20. Riva G. (2013). I tre paradossi dei Social Network. In Scabini E. e Rossi G. (a cura di) Famiglia e nuovi media. Milano: Vita e Pensiero, pp. 16-17.
  21. Rivoltella P. (2013). Educare ai nuovi media in famiglia: metafore e prospettive, intervento al Convegno Family TAG, Technology Across Generations, Milano, 18 ottobre.
  22. Rivoltella P., Ferrari S. (2013). Educare ai new media in ambito familiare. Rifles-sioni pedagogiche. In Scabini E. e Rossi G. (a cura di) Famiglia e nuovi media. Milano: Vita e Pensiero, pp. 127-146.
  23. Rowan C. (2015). 10 Reasons Why Handheld Devices Should Be Banned for Chil-dren Under the Age of 12. Huffington Post. --Testi disponibile al sito: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cris-rowan/10-reasons-why-handheld-devices-should-be-banned_b_4899218.html [data di consultazione: 10-06-2016].
  24. Truzoli R. (2014). Internet Addiction, umore e tratti di personalità. Evidenze dalla ricerca di base, intervento al Congresso Internazionale Congress on Internet Addiction Disorders, Milano, 21-22 marzo.
  25. Veneroni L., Ferrari A., Massimino M., Clerici C.A. (2015). Facebook in oncologia. Revisione della letteratura. Recenti progressi in medicina, 106: 46-51. DOI: 10.1701/1740.1896
  26. Vittadini N., Milesi D., Aroldi P. (2013). New-generation Ties: Identity, Social Relations and Digital Technologies among 2G Migrants in Italy. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal: 61-88.
  27. Weinstein A., Curtiss Feder L., Rosenberg K.P., Dannon P. (2014). Internet addic-tion disorder: Overview and controversies. In Curtiss Feder L. e Rosenberg K.P. (eds.), Behavioral addictions. San Diego: Academic Press.
  28. Widyanto L., Griffiths M. (2006). ‘Internet addiction’: A critical review. Interna-tional Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4: 31–51.
  29. Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1: 237–244.

Marta Di Grado, Aurora Boison, Margherita Tata, Virginia Tamborini, Social media e legami familiari: verso un superamento della dicotomia tra mondo reale e digitale in "RIVISTA DI PSICOTERAPIA RELAZIONALE " 45/2017, pp 68-81, DOI: 10.3280/PR2017-045004