A Study in Noir

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Author/s Luc Boltanski
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/2 Language Italian
Pages 22 P. 47-68 File size 254 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2019-002004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Why did crime fiction first establish itself on the basis of a distinction, or even opposition, between the character of the detective and that of the police officer? This article explores the series of Sherlock Holmes stories published by Arthur Conan Doyle and analyses the relationship between the emergence of crime fiction and the strengthening of nation-states. Nation-states, with their bio-political projects, aim at ensuring that reality is both ordered and predictable. Mysteries stand out on this backdrop of supposedly calculable reality. Social reality is structured by the tension between law and order and the class society. Police officers embody law and order, to which all subordinates have to abide by. The detective, using extra-legal means, solves mysteries affecting upper class members of society. The detective is the state’s ordinary state of exception.

Keywords: Crime Fiction; State; Exception; Reality; Mystery.

  1. Brissenden, R. F. 1974. Virtue in Distress. Studies in the Novel of Sentiment from Richardson to Sade. Londres: Macmillan.
  2. Agamben, G. 1997. Homo Sacer, I. Le pouvoir souverain et la vie nue. Paris: Le Seuil.
  3. Baudou, J., Schleret J.-J. 2001. Ed. Le polar. Paris: Larousse.
  4. Bauman, Z. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence,. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Beniger, J. 1986. The Control Revolution. Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  6. Boltanski, L. 1990. La dénonciation publique, in Id. L’amour et la justice comme compétences. Trois essais de sociologie de l’action. Paris: Métailié, pp. 253-366.
  7. — 2009a. De la critique. Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris: Gallimard.
  8. — 2009b. Énigmes et complots. Une enquête à propos d’enquêtes. Paris: Gallimard.
  9. Boltanski, L., Claverie, É., Offenstadt, N. et Van Damme, S. 2007. Affaires, scandales et grandes causes. De Socrate à Pinochet. Paris: Stock.
  10. Boltanski, L. et Thévenot, L. 1991. De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.
  11. Bull, M. 1999. Seeing Things Hidden. Apocalypse, Vision and Totality. London: Verso.
  12. Claverie, É. 1994 . Procès, affaire, cause. Voltaire et l’innovation critique, in Politix. 26, pp. 76-86.
  13. — 1998. La naissance d’une forme politique: l’affaire du chevalier de La Barre, in P. Roussin. Ed. Critique et affaires de blasphème à l’époque des Lumières. Paris: Honoré Champion, pp. 185-260.
  14. Conan Doyle, A. 1985. Sherlock Holmes. The Complete Illustrated Short Stories, [1887-1927]. London: Chancellor Press.
  15. Desrosières, A. 1993. La politique des grands nombres. Paris: La Découverte.
  16. Eco, U. et Sebeok, T.A. Ed. 1983. The Sign of Three. Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  17. Foucault, M. 2004. Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France, [1977-1978]. Paris: EHESS. Gallimard. Le Seuil.
  18. Ginzburg, C. 1989. Traces: racines d’un paradigme indiciaire, in Id. Mythes, emblèmes, traces. Morphologie et Histoire. Paris: Flammarion, pp. 139-180.
  19. Habermas, J. 1978. L’espace public. Archéologie de la publicité comme dimension constitutive de la société bourgeoise. [1962]. Paris: Payot.
  20. Hadot, P. 2004. Le voile d’Isis. Essai sur l’histoire de l’idée de nature. Paris: Gallimard.
  21. Honneth, A. 2006. La société du mépris. Paris: La Découverte.
  22. Kalifa, D. 1995. L’encre et le sang. Récits de crimes et société à la Belle Époque, Paris, Fayard.
  23. — 2005. Crime et culture au XIXe siècle. Paris: Perrin.
  24. Kaplan, F. 1987. Sacred Tears. Sentimentality in Victorian Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  25. Keck, F. 2005. Claude Lévi-Strauss. Une introduction. Paris: La Découverte.
  26. Koselleck, R. 1979. Le règne de la critique. Paris: Minuit.
  27. Kracauer, S. 1981. Le roman policier. Un traité philosophique. Paris: Payot.
  28. L’Heuillet, H. 2001. Basse politique, haute police. Une approche historique et philosophique de la police. Paris: Fayard.
  29. Manchette, J.-P. 1972. Nada. Paris: Gallimard.
  30. Mann, M. 1984. The autonomous power of the State: its origins, mechanisms and results, in Archives européennes de sociologie, 25, 2, pp. 185-213.
  31. — 1993. The Sources of Social Power, 2, The Rise of Class and Nation-States, 1760-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Maza, S. 1995. Vies privées, affaires publiques. Les causes célèbres de la France prérévolutionnaire. Paris: Fayard.
  33. Nisbet, R.A. 1993. La tradition sociologique. Paris: PUF.
  34. Noiriel, G. Ed. 2007. L’identification. Genèse d’un travail d’État. Paris: Belin.
  35. Sartre, J.-P. 1960. Critique de la raison dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.
  36. Stevenson, R.L. 2000. The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. London: Penguin Classics.
  37. Vareille, J.-C. 1989. L’homme masqué, le justicier et le détective. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.

Luc Boltanski, Uno studio in noir in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 2/2019, pp 47-68, DOI: 10.3280/SP2019-002004