Between aspirations and educational choices: The paths of a generation

Journal title EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Author/s Francesca Bianchi, Marco Betti
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2019/2 Language English
Pages 24 P. 114-137 File size 269 KB
DOI 10.3280/ERP2019-002007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This essay takes into account a cohort of interviewed who graduated in the ’70s in two different local societies, Firenze and Prato. It is a study on a specific generation which in that specific historical moment seems to have used education as a real instrument of social mobility. In the paper we’ll consider the individuals and their main life events such as the socialisation experiences and the planning of their careers. Which were the educational choices of these individuals? Which were the role and the impact of education on their professional and social positions? In this analysis a particular attention will be dedicated to the gender differences and therefore to the motivation and educational success achieved. Furthermore we’ll consider how the local cultures influenced the individuals in the two different places. Several variables seem to have played an important role in planning their educational careers. If the social origins and the familiar context played a clear role as a fundamental place for the socialization, other elements have been taken into account. First of all the individual motivations for the choice and attendance of the educational institutions and university. Social relations developed in different places and significant events, especially the collective and political ones, have been examined as well, in order to understand their role in determining the educational paths.

  1. Balbo L. (1976). Stato di famiglia. Bisogni, privato, collettivo. Milano: Etas.
  2. Ballarino G., Panichella N. (2014). Origini familiari, scuola secondaria e accesso all’università dei diplomati italiani, 1995-2007. Scuola Democratica, pp. 365-392, DOI: 10.12828/77422
  3. Benadusi L. (1984). Scuola, riproduzione, mutamento. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
  4. Benadusi L. (1984). Scuola, riproduzione, mutamento: sociologie dell’educazione a confronto. Scandicci: La Nuova Italia.
  5. Benadusi L. e Molina S. (2018). Le competenze. Una mappa per orientarsi. Bologna: il Mulino.
  6. Bernstein B. (1975). Class, Codes and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan.
  7. Bianco M.L. (1996). Classi e reti sociali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  8. Bianco M. L. (a cura di) (2001a). L’Italia delle disuguaglianze. Roma: Carocci.
  9. Bianco M. L. (2001b). Il capitale sociale nello studio delle diseguaglianze: la forza dell’omogeneità occupazionale. In: Id., L’Italia delle diseguaglianze, pp. 23-52, Roma: Carocci.
  10. Boudon R. (1979). Istruzione e mobilità sociale. Bologna: Zanichelli.
  11. Brint S. (2006). Scuola e società. Bologna: il Mulino.
  12. Burt R.S. (1992). Structural holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. Checchi D. (1997). L’efficacia del sistema scolastico italiano in prospettiva storica. In: Rossi N. (a cura di). L’istruzione in Italia: solo un pezzo di carta?. Bologna: il Mulino.
  14. Eve M. (1998). Qui se ressemble s’assemble?. In: Gribaudi M. Espaces, temporalités, stratification. Exercises sur les réseaux sociaux. Paris: Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences sociales.
  15. Gabriele S., Raitano M. (2014). Percorso formativo, differenziali salariali e background familiare: l'evidenza italiana. Scuola Democratica, 2: 393-416, DOI: 10.12828/77423
  16. Gambetta D. (1990). Per amore o per forza?. Bologna: il Mulino.
  17. Giovannini, P. (1991). I figli di Prato. Il Ponte, no. 2, pp.77-93.
  18. Giovannini P. et al. (2001). Il distretto e la città: pratiche di disuguaglianza. In: Bianco M. L. (a cura di). L’Italia delle diseguaglianze. Roma: Carocci.
  19. Goldthorpe J.H. Llewellyn C. Payne C. (1987). Social mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  20. Jedlowski P. (1999). Le trasformazioni dell’esperienza. In: Leccardi C. (ed.). Limiti della modernità. Roma: Carocci.
  21. Pescarolo A. (1993). Gli imprenditori pratesi e il ricambio generazionale. Quaderni dell’Osservatorio, 3, Prato.
  22. Pisati M. (2002). La partecipazione al sistema scolastico. In: Schizzerotto A. (a cura di). Vite ineguali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  23. Schizzerotto A. (1997). “Scuola” in Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali. Roma: Treccani, VII.
  24. Schizzerotto A. (ed.) (2002). Vite ineguali. Disuguaglianze e corsi di vita nell’Italia contemporanea. Bologna: il Mulino.
  25. Schizzerotto A., Barone C. (2006). Sociologia dell’istruzione. Bologna: il Mulino.
  26. Triventi M. (2014). Le disuguaglianze di istruzione secondo l’origine sociale. Una rassegna della letteratura sul caso italiano. Scuola Democratica, 2: 321-342, DOI: 10.12828/77420

Francesca Bianchi, Marco Betti, Between aspirations and educational choices: The paths of a generation in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 2/2019, pp 114-137, DOI: 10.3280/ERP2019-002007