Effects of cultural distance on foreign acquisitions: evidence from italian acquired firms

Author/s Michela Matarazzo, Gabriele Barbaresco, Resciniti Riccardo
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/3
Language English Pages 23 P. 159-181 File size 471 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2016-003009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The present paper aims at analyzing the influence of cultural distance on acquisitions from MNEs of Italian mid-sized firms in terms of the economic performance of target firms. In literature a variety of works has focused on cultural distance as an explicative variable of the results of cross-border acquisitions. Using data from the Mediobanca Research Department Database we analyze Italian midsized firms acquired from MNEs between 1999 and 2009, in order to understand whether or not their performance improved over the post-acquisition period. Using a multidimensional measure of cultural distance, we tested the relationship between cultural distance and target firm’s performance in cross-border acquisitions by means of a regression analysis. Our study is the first to examine the impact of cultural distance on post-acquisition performance using the universe of Italian acquired midsized firms. The findings support our hypothesis that cultural distance has a negative effect on post-acquisition performance.

Keywords: Cross border acquisitions, performance of target firms, cultural distance, mid-sized firms, foreign direct investments, International Business.

  1. Dikova D., Rao Sahib P. (2013). Is cultural distance a bane or a boon for cross-border acquisition performance?. Journal of World Business, 48(1): 77-86, doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.009.
  2. Anand J., Delios A. (1997). Location specificity and the transferability of downstream assets to foreign subsidiaries. Journal of international business studies, 579-603.
  3. Barbaresco G., Salerno E. (2013). Mid-sized companies according to Mediobanca-Unioncamere. In: Coltorti F., Resciniti R., Tunisini A., Varaldo R. Mid-sized Manufacturing Companies: The New Driver of Italian Competitiveness, Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2589-9_2.
  4. Barkema H.G., Vermeulen F. (1998), International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 7-26, DOI: 10.2307/256894
  5. Beckerman W. (1956). Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade. The review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 31-40.
  6. Bernard A. B., Jensen J. B., Redding S. J., Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade (No. w13054). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  7. Bertrand O. (2009). Effects of foreign acquisitions on R&D activity: Evidence from firm-level data for France. Research Policy, 38(6): 1021-1031 doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.001.
  8. Bertrand O., Zitouna H. (2008). Domestic versus cross-border acquisitions: which impact on the target firms’ performance?. Applied Economics, 40(17): 2221-2238, DOI: 10.1080/00036840600949397
  9. Bertoli G., Resciniti R. (2013). Made in Italy e country of origin effect. Mercati e Competitività, 2: 13-36, DOI: 10.3280/mc2013-002002
  10. Brewer P.A. (2007). Operationalizing psychic distance: A revised approach. Journal of International Marketing, 15(1): 44-66.
  11. Buckley P.J., Elia S., Kafouros M. (2014). Acquisitions by emerging market multinationals: Implications for firm performance. Journal of World Business, 49(4): 611-632.
  12. Capar N., Kotabe M. (2003). The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4): 345-355.
  13. Caves, R. E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41(162): 176-193.
  14. Chari A., Chen W., Dominguez K.M.E. (2012). Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance: Emerging Market Acquisitions in the United States. IMF Economic Review, 60(1): 1-42, DOI: 10.1057/imfer.2012.1
  15. Coltorti F., Resciniti R., Tunisini A., Varaldo R. (2013). Mid-sized Manufacturing Companies: The New Driver of Italian Competitiveness, Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2589-9
  16. Contractor F.J., Kundu S.K., Hsu C.C. (2003). A three-stage theory of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of international business studies, 33(1): 48-60.
  17. Conyon M.J., Girma S., Thompson S., Wright P.W. (2002). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on company employment in the United Kingdom. European Economic Review, 46 (1): 31-49, DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2921(00)00086-6
  18. Dalli D., Resciniti R., Tunisini A. (2010). Sviluppo e competitività delle medie imprese italiane dell’era globale. Mercati e Competitività, 3: 19-46.
  19. Davies S.W., Lyons B.R. (1991). Characterising relative performance: The productivity advantage of foreign owned firms in the UK. Oxford Economic Papers, 43(4): 584-595.
  20. De Jong G., van Houten J. (2014). The impact of MNE cultural diversity on the internationalization-performance relationship. Theory and evidence from European multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 23(1): 313-326, DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.05.005
  21. Dikova D. (2009). Performance of foreign subsidiaries: Does psychic distance matter?. International Business Review, 18(1): 38-49, doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.11.001
  22. Dunning J.H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of international business studies, 1-31.
  23. Ellis P. D. (2008). Does psychic distance moderate the market size-entry sequence relationship?. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3): 351-369, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400360
  24. Fang E., Zou S. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of marketing dynamic capabilities in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5): 742-761, DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2008.96
  25. Friedman T.L. (2005). It’s a flat world, after all. The New York Times, 3: 33-37.
  26. Giachetti C., Spadafora E., Bursi T. (2013). Internazionalizzazione, performance delle imprese e crisi economiche: i produttori di piastrelle di ceramica del distretto di Modena e Reggio Emilia. Mercati e Competitività, 4: 37-58, DOI: 10.3280/mc2013-004003
  27. Girma S., Greenaway D., Wakelin K. and Sousa N. (2000). Host country effects of FDI in the UK: recent evidence from firm level data, in: N. Pain (Ed.), Inward Investment, Technological Change and Growth: The Impact of Multinational Corporations on the UK Economy, 104-121, London: Palgrave Press.
  28. Habib M., Zurawicki, L. (2002). Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2): 291-307, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491017
  29. Håkanson L., Ambos B. (2010). The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, 16(3): 195-210.
  30. Heyman F., Sjoholm F., Tingvall P. G. (2007). Is there really a foreign ownership wage premium? Evidence from matched employer-employee data. Journal of International Economics, 73(2): 355-376, DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.04.003
  31. Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., Kim H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4): 767-798.
  32. Hofstede G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
  33. Hofstede G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Workrelated Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  34. Hofstede G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1): 8.
  35. Hofstede G., Bond M.H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational dynamics, 16(4): 5-21, DOI: 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
  36. Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. (2010), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  37. House R., Javidan M., Hanges P., Dorfman P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of world business, 37(1): 3-10.
  38. Hutzschenreuter T., Kleindienst I., Lange S. (2014). Added Psychic Distance Stimuli and MNE Performance. Performance Effects of Added Cultural, Governance, Geographic, and Economic Distance in MNEs’ International Expansion. Journal of International Management, 20(1): 38-54, DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2013.02.003.
  39. Piscitello L., Rabbiosi L. (2005). The impact of inward FDI on local companies’ labour productivity: evidence from the Italian case. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(1): 35-51, DOI: 10.1080/1357151042000323120
  40. Qian G. (1996). The effect of multinationality measures upon the risk-return performance of US firms. International Business Review, 5(3): 247-265.
  41. Ranft A.L., Lord M.D. (2002). Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: A grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science, 13 (4): 420-441, DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.420.2952
  42. Shenkar O. (2001). Cultural Distance Revisited: Towards More Rigorous Conceptualization and Measurement of Cultural Differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519-535, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982
  43. Shenkar O. (2012). Beyond cultural distance: switching to a friction lens in the study of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1): 12-17, DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2011.42
  44. Slangen A.H.L. (2006). National cultural distance and initial foreign acquisition performance: The moderating effect of integration. Journal of World Business, 41(2): 161-170, DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2006.01.003
  45. Stahl G.K., Voigt A. (2008). Do Cultural Differences Matter in Mergers and Acquisitions? A Tentative Model and Examination. Organization Science, 19(1): 160-176, DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0270
  46. Tihanyi L., Griffith D.A., Russel C.J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A metaanalysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3): 270-283, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400136
  47. Tung R.L., Verbeke A. (2010). Beyond Hofstede and GLOBE: improving the quality of cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8): 1259-1274, DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2010.41
  48. Xu D., Shenkar O. (2002). Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 608-618, DOI: 10.5465/amr.2002.7566108
  49. Yu T., Subramaniam M., Cannella A.A. Jr (2013). Competing globally, allying locally: Alliances between global rivals and host-country factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(2): 117-137, DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2012.37
  50. Zollo M., Singh H. (2004). Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Postacquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13): 1233-1256, DOI: 10.1002/smj.426

  • When Digitalization Meets Omnichannel in International Markets: A Case Study from the Agri-Food Industry Maria Vincenza Ciasullo, Raffaella Montera, Francesco Mercuri, Shame Mugova, in Administrative Sciences /2022 pp.68
    DOI: 10.3390/admsci12020068

Michela Matarazzo, Gabriele Barbaresco, Resciniti Riccardo, Effects of cultural distance on foreign acquisitions: evidence from italian acquired firms in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 3/2016, pp 159-181, DOI: 10.3280/MC2016-003009