Journal title ECONOMIA PUBBLICA
Author/s Stefano Clò, Marco Di Giulio, Maria Tullia Galanti, Maddalena Sorrentino
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3 Language English
Pages 39 P. 11-49 File size 391 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The present paper analyzes the top ten Italian state-owned enterprises (SOEs) over the period 2004-2013, after both their corporate organization and their markets have been deeply reformed. We question whether SOEs’ strategies are more profit or public oriented. The authors find that, on average, the management and performance of the Italian SOEs has improved and it holds the comparison with private and public European industry peers. Still, remarkable divergences persist among Italian in terms of performance and orientation towards markets or public values, largely depending on the intensity of the reforms they went through. Listed SOEs operating in liberalized markets are largely profitable and distribute dividends. They have expanded their business internationally, though cross-border M&As. As a result, a high share of their revenues and employees originates out of Italy. Conversely, unlisted SOEs operating in non-competitive markets are still somehow compelled to maintain an informal public mission; they provide universal services, they often incur in economic losses, which are partly covered by taxpayers.
Keywords: State-owned enterprises, public mission, state capitalism, privatization
Jel codes: L2, L33, L8
Stefano Clò, Marco Di Giulio, Maria Tullia Galanti, Maddalena Sorrentino, Italian state-owned enterprises after decades of reforms: Still public? in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 3/2016, pp 11-49, DOI: 10.3280/EP2016-003002