Italian state-owned enterprises after decades of reforms: Still public?

Author/s Stefano Clò, Marco Di Giulio, Maria Tullia Galanti, Maddalena Sorrentino
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3 Language English
Pages 39 P. 11-49 File size 391 KB
DOI 10.3280/EP2016-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The present paper analyzes the top ten Italian state-owned enterprises (SOEs) over the period 2004-2013, after both their corporate organization and their markets have been deeply reformed. We question whether SOEs’ strategies are more profit or public oriented. The authors find that, on average, the management and performance of the Italian SOEs has improved and it holds the comparison with private and public European industry peers. Still, remarkable divergences persist among Italian in terms of performance and orientation towards markets or public values, largely depending on the intensity of the reforms they went through. Listed SOEs operating in liberalized markets are largely profitable and distribute dividends. They have expanded their business internationally, though cross-border M&As. As a result, a high share of their revenues and employees originates out of Italy. Conversely, unlisted SOEs operating in non-competitive markets are still somehow compelled to maintain an informal public mission; they provide universal services, they often incur in economic losses, which are partly covered by taxpayers.

Keywords: State-owned enterprises, public mission, state capitalism, privatization

Jel codes: L2, L33, L8

  1. Amoroso B. and Olsen O.J. (1978). Lo stato imprenditore. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  2. Andrews R., Boyne G.A. and Walker R.M. (2011). Dimensions of Publicness and Organizational Performance: A Review of the Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 3): i301-i319.
  3. Arrigo U. and Di Foggia G. (2013). Gli aiuti di Stato al settore ferroviario nell’Unione Europea [State Aid to Railways in Europe]. Bicocca Open Archive. Working paper of Di.SEA.DE.
  4. Arrigo U. and Di Foggia G. (2014). Alle origini del debito: il contributo della spesa per le Poste alla formazione del debito pubblico dell’Italia, Bicocca Open Archive Working Paper of Di.SEA.DE.
  5. Artoni R. (ed.) (2014). Storia dell’IRI. Vol. IV - Crisi e Privatizzazione. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  6. Asquer A. (2011). Liberalization and regulatory reform of network industries: A comparative analysis of Italian public utilities. Utilities Policy, 19: 172-184.
  7. Barca F. and Trento S. (2010). La parabola delle partecipazioni statali: una missione tradita. In: Barca F. (ed.). Storia del capitalismo italiano. Roma: Donzelli.
  8. Bartkus B., Glassman M. and Bruce McAfee R. (2000). Mission statements: Are they smoke and mirrors? Business Horizons, 43(6): 23-28. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-6813(00)80018-X
  9. Barucci E. and Pierobon F. (2007). Le privatizzazioni in Italia. Roma: Carocci.
  10. Battilossi S. (2014). La “nuova” Cassa depositi e prestiti. In: De Cecco M. and Toniolo G. (ed.). Storia della Cassa depositi e prestiti. Un nuovo corso: la Società per Azioni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  11. Blair-Loy M., Wharton, A.S. and Goodstein J. (2011). Exploring the relationship between mission statements and work-life practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 32(3): 427-450. DOI: 10.1177/0170840610397480.
  12. Bognetti G. and Obermann G. (2012). Local public services in European countries: main results of a research project by CIRIEC International. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(4): 485-503.
  13. Bozeman B. (1987). All organizations are public. London: Jossey-Bass.
  14. Bozeman B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  15. Castronovo V. (2012). Storia dell’IRI. Vol. I – Dalle origini al dopoguerra. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  16. Celli P.L. and Balestrieri L. (2003). Il piccolo schermo e il declino dello spirito pubblico. Il Mulino, 52(2): 306-316. DOI: 10.1402/874
  17. CIRIEC, Bernier L. (eds.) (2014). Public Enterprises Today: Missions, Performance and Governance. Learning from Fifteen Cases. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
  18. Citroni G., Lippi A. and Profeti S. (2012). Governi locali. Le società partecipate dei comuni, strumento e arena del governo locale. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  19. Consob (2013). Report on Corporate Governance of Italian listed Companies, November.
  20. de Bruijn H. and Dicke W. (2006). Strategies for safeguarding public values in liberalized utility sectors. Public Administration, 84(3): 717-735.
  21. Delponte L., Sorrentino M., Turri M. and Vandone D. (2014). The transformation of Milan’s City Energy Enterprise in a Leading National Industry Group. In: CIRIEC and Bernier L. (eds.). Public Enterprises Today: Missions, Performance and Governance. Learning from Fifteen Cases. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
  22. Di Giulio M. (2011). Principali, principianti. Le regioni ed i servizi di trasporto ferroviario locale (1997-2011). Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 3: 533-565. DOI: 10.1483/36306
  23. Di Giulio M. and Moro F.N. (2016). The internationalization of network industries: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Italian railways and utilities. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18(1): 21-37. DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2015.1095426
  24. Elefanti M. and Cerrato D. (2008). La governance delle imprese pubbliche locali. In: Mele R. and Mussari R. (eds.). L’innovazione della governance e delle strategie nei settori delle public utilities. Bologna: il Mulino.
  25. Financial Times (2012). Italy’s State financing body keeps a low profile and a high focus, November 20th, p. 17.
  26. Financial Times (2016). Italy’s Atlante bank fund shoulders big burden, by Hale T., Arnold M. and Sanderson R., April 20. Accessed online on May 31, 2016.
  27. Florio M. (2014). Contemporary public enterprises: innovation, accountability, governance. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17: 201-208. DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2014.913823
  28. Giannelli N. (2010). Né stato né mercato. La depubblicizzazione dei servizi locali in Italia. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche (2): 115-143. DOI: 10.1483/32675
  29. Grant W., Martinelli A. and Paterson W. (1989). Large firms as political actors: A comparative analysis of the chemical industry in Britain, Italy and Germany. West European Politics, 12(2): 72-90. DOI: 10.1080/01402388908424739
  30. Grifone P. (1971). Il capitale finanziario in Italia. La politica economica del fascismo. Torino: Einaudi.
  31. Heath J. and Norman W. (2004). Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach us in the Post-Enron era? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3): 247-265.
  32. Hotho J.J. (2014). From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power. Organization Studies, 35(5): 671-702. DOI: 10.1177/0170840613502767
  33. Jørgensen T.B. and Bozeman B. (2007). Public values an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3): 354-381. DOI: 10.1177/0095399707300703
  34. Kernaghan K. (2000). The post-bureaucratic organization and public service values. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1): 91-104. DOI: 10.1177/0020852300661008
  35. La Repubblica (2013). CdP batte i bilanci delle banche. Ai soci dividendi per un miliardo, March 21st, p. 28.
  36. Leuthesser L. and Kohli C. (1997). Corporate identity: The role of mission statements. Business Horizons, 40(3): 59-66. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-6813(97)90053-7
  37. Lorrain D. (2005). Urban capitalisms: European models in competition. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(2): 231-267.
  38. MacCarthaigh M. (2011). Managing state-owned enterprises in an age of crisis: an analysis of Irish experience. Policy Studies, 32(3): 215-230. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2011.561688
  39. Mediobanca (2014a). I maggiori 50 gruppi societari quotati in Borsa. Ricerche e Studi, Ufficio Studi Mediobanca.
  40. Mediobanca (2014b). Le principali società italiane (2014). Ricerche e Studi, Ufficio Studi Mediobanca.
  41. Meier H.E. (2003). Beyond Convergence: Understanding Programming Strategies of Public Broadcasters in Competitive Environments. European Journal of Communication, 18(3): 337-365. DOI: 10.1177/02673231030183003
  42. Meijer Costera I. (2005). Impact or Content? Ratings vs Quality in Public Broadcasting. European Journal of Communication, 20(1): 27-53. DOI: 10.1177/0267323105049632
  43. Munari F., Roberts E. and Sobrero M. (2002). Privatization Processes and the Redefinition of Corporate R&D Boundaries. Research Policy, 31: 31-53.
  44. Preston L.E. and Post J.E. (1975). Private management and public policy. The principle of public responsibility. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  45. Salvemini M.T. (2014). La Cassa Depositi e Prestiti tra il 1996 e il 2002. Memoria di un’esperienza di gestione. In: De Cecco M., Toniolo G. (eds.). Storia della Cassa depositi e prestiti. Un nuovo corso: la società per azioni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  46. Sapelli G. and Carnevali F. (1992). Uno sviluppo tra politica estera e strategia. Eni (1953-1985). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  47. Scott C. (2000). Services of General Interest in EC Law: Matching Values to Regulatory Technique in the Public and Privatised Sectors. European Law Journal, 6(4): 310-325.
  48. Soda G. (2015). La deregulation intacca il potere dei grandi? Economia & Management, (1): 85-105.
  49. Soda G., Bergami M. and Celli P.L. (2012). National Monopoly to Successful Multinational: The Case of Enel. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  50. Stan C.V., Peng M.W. and Bruton G.D. (2014). Slack and the performance of state-owned enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2): 473-495.
  51. Sterlacchini A. (2012). Energy R&D in private and state-owned utilities: An analysis of the major world electric companies. Energy Policy, 41: 494-506.
  52. Wettenhall R. (2001). Public or Private? Public Corporations, Companies and the Decline of the Middle Ground. Public Organization Review, 1(1): 17-40.
  53. Wettenhall R. and Thynne I. (2002). Public enterprise and privatization in a new century: evolving patterns of governance and public management. Public Finance & Management, 2(1): 1-31.
  54. Wormald A. (1972). Growth Promotion: The creation of a modern steel industry. In: Holland S (ed.). The State as Entrepreneur. New Dimension for Public Enterprise: the IRI State Shareholding Formula. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

  • Optimal Share of Privatisation in a Public Monopoly with Unionised Workers Luciano Fanti, Domenico Buccella, in Politická ekonomie /2021 pp.511
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1328
  • Concilier le profit et l’intérêt général : l’État actionnaire dans les dynamiques historiques du capitalisme Hadrien Coutant, Antoine Ducastel, Scott Viallet-Thévenin, in Revue de la régulation /2021
    DOI: 10.4000/regulation.20029
  • Sur les chemins de la normalisation Hadrien Coutant, Jean Finez, Scott Viallet-Thévenin, in Revue française de sociologie /2021 pp.341
    DOI: 10.3917/rfs.613.0341
  • Rationales, performance and governance of public entreprises. Editorial introduction Luc Bernier, Massimo Florio, Johan Willner, in ECONOMIA PUBBLICA 3/2017 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/EP2016-003001
  • The state as an eager shareholder Hadrien Coutant, Scott Viallet-Thévenin, in Revue de la régulation /2021
    DOI: 10.4000/regulation.19589

Stefano Clò, Marco Di Giulio, Maria Tullia Galanti, Maddalena Sorrentino, Italian state-owned enterprises after decades of reforms: Still public? in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 3/2016, pp 11-49, DOI: 10.3280/EP2016-003002