Rappresentazioni e identità degli operatori sociali come street-level bureaucrats e situated agents

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Autori/Curatori Laura Cataldi, Valeria Cappellato
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2020/121
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 24 P. 90-113 Dimensione file 249 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2020-121005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

;

  1. D. Anagnostopoulos (2003), «The new accountability, student failure, and teachers’ work in urban high schools», Educational Policy, 17, pp. 291-316, DOI: 10.1177/0895904803017003001
  2. H.G. Frederickson (1997), The Spirit of Public, Standford, Stanford University Press.
  3. J. Gal, I. Weiss-Gal (eds.) (2013), Social Workers Affecting Social Policy: An International Perspective in Policy Practice, Bristol/Chicago, The Policy Press.
  4. M.E. Guy, M.A. Newman, S.H. Mastracci (2008), Emotional Labor: Putting the Service in Human Service, Armonk, M.E. Sharpe.
  5. J.F. Handler (1990), Law and the Search for Community, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
  6. J.F. Handler (1996), Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  7. J. Harris (1998), «Scientific Management, Bureau-Professionalism and New Managerialism: The Labour Process of State Social Work», British Journal of Social Work, 28, pp. 839-62,
  8. Y. Hasenfeld (2000), «Organizational Forms as Moral Practices: The Case of Welfare Departments», Social Service Review, 74, 3, pp. 329-51, DOI: 10.1086/516408
  9. S. Herbert (1996), «Morality in Law Enforcement: Chasing ‘Bad Guys’ with the Los Angeles Police Department», Law & Society Review, 40, 4, pp.799-818, DOI: 10.2307/3054118
  10. R.M. Kanter, B.A. Stein (eds.) (1979), Life in Organizations: Workplaces as People Experience Them, New York, Basic Books.
  11. R. Kleyn, J. Maybin (2012), Thinking about rationing, London: The King’s Fund.
  12. I. Lapsley, S. Llewellyn (1998), Markets, hierarchies and choices in social care, in W. Bartlett, J. Roberts, J. LeGrand (eds.), A Revolution in Social Policy, Bristol, Policy Press.
  13. C. Lindsay, R. McQuaid (2008), «Inter-agency Co-operation in Activation: Comparing Three Vanguard “Active” Welfare States», Social Policy and Society, 7, 3, pp. 353-65, DOI: 10.1017/S1474746408004326
  14. M. Lipsky (1980), Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
  15. J.L. Mashaw (1983), Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims, New Haven, Yale University Press.
  16. S. Maynard-Moody, M. Musheno (2000), «State‐Agent or Citizen‐Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion», Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 2, pp. 329-59,
  17. S. Maynard-Moody, M. Musheno (2003), Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
  18. S. Maynard‐Moody, S. Portillo (2010), Street‐Level Bureaucracy Theory, in R.F. Durant (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy, -- http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238958.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199238958-e-11.
  19. H. Mintzberg (1979), The Structuring of Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
  20. H. Mintzberg (1980), «Structure in 5’s: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design», Management Science, 26, 3, pp.322-341,
  21. S. Folkman, R.S. Lazarus (1980), «An Analysis of Coping in a Middle-aged Community Sample», Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, pp. 219-39, DOI: 10.2307/2136617
  22. S. Fargion (2018), «Social-work promoting participation: reflections on policy practice in Italy», European Journal of Social Work, 21, 4, pp. 559-571, DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1320528
  23. T. Evans, J. Harris (2004), «Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion», British Journal of Social Work, 34, 6, pp. 871-95,
  24. T. Evans (2013), «Organisational Rules and Discretion in Adult Social Work», British Journal of Social Work, 43, pp. 739-58,
  25. T. Evans (2011), «Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy», British Journal of Social Work, 41, pp.368–386,
  26. T. Evans (2010), Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond Street-Level Bureaucracy, London, Ashgate.
  27. L. Cataldi, W. Tousijn (2015), «Quale managerialismo nei servizi sociali? Considerazioni critiche», Polis, 2, pp. 157-90, DOI: 10.1424/80581
  28. L. Cataldi, V. Cappellato (2019), «Coping Strategies e razionamento. La discrezionalità degli operatori sociali come street-level bureaucrats e situated agents», Sociologia del lavoro, 155, pp. 96-119, DOI: 10.3280/SL2019-155005
  29. L. Cataldi (2018), New Public Governance as a State Resilience Strategy. The Italian Secondo Welfare Narrative as a Test Case, presentato all’International Symposium on «Implementing Collaborative Governance», Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche – Dems, Università di Palermo, 25-26 ottobre.
  30. L. Cataldi (2017), I «nuovi» servizi sociali: vecchio managerialismo e moderna burocratizzazione, in W. Tousijn, M. Dellavalle (a c. di), Logica professionale e logica manageriale. Una ricerca sulle professioni sociali, Bologna, il Mulino.
  31. L. Cataldi (2015), «Coproduzione: uno strumento di riforma in tempi di austerity?», Rivista italiana di politiche pubbliche, 1, pp. 59-86.
  32. V. Cappellato (2017), Categorizzazione e microrazionamento: dilemmi, tensioni, vincoli ed effetti imprevisti, in W. Tousijn, M. Dellavalle M. (a c. di), Logica professionale e logica manageriale. Una ricerca sulle professioni sociali, Bologna, il Mulino.
  33. A. Campanini, C. Facchini (2013), Social Workers Affecting Social Policy in Italy, in J. Gal, I. Weiss (eds.), Social Workers Affecting Social Policy: An International Perspective on Policy Practice, Bristol/Chicago, The Policy Press.
  34. M.K. Brown (1981), Working the Street: Police Discretion and the Dilemmas of Reform, New York, Russell Sage Foundation.
  35. E.Z. Brodkin (2011), «Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations Under New Managerialism», Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, pp. i253-i277,
  36. E.Z. Brodkin (2007), «Bureaucracy Redux: Management Reformism in the Welfare State», Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 1, pp. 1-17,
  37. E.Z. Brodkin (1997), «Inside the Welfare Contract: Discretion and Accountability in State Welfare Administration», Social Service Review, 71, 1, pp. 1-30, DOI: 10.1086/604228
  38. E.Z. Brodkin (1990), Implementation as Policy Politics, in D.J. Palumbo, D. Calista (eds.), Implementation and The Policy Process: Opening up the Black Box, Westport (CT), Greenwood Press.
  39. J. Brehm, S. Gates (1997), Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
  40. M. Bevir, R.A.W. Rhodes (2006), Governance Stories, New York, Routledge.
  41. M. Bevir (2012), New Labour: A Critique, London, Routledge.
  42. T.F. Bertotti (2018), Social Welfare in an Era of Crisis: The Impact of the Crisis on Social Workers. The Italian case, in C. Panagiotopolus C. (ed.), The impact of the Crisis into Social Work Practice. A comparative analysis of Mediterranean Countries, Mauritius, Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
  43. S. Baviskar (2018), «Who Creams? Explaining the Classroom Cream-Skimming Behavior of School Teachers from a Street-Level Bureaucracy Perspective», International Public Management Journal, DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1478918
  44. G.P. Whitaker (1980), «Coproduction. Citizen Participation in Service Delivery», Public Administration Review, 40, 3, pp. 240-46, DOI: 10.2307/97537
  45. P. Aucoin (1990), «Administrative Reform in Public Management», Governance, 3, 2, pp. 115-37,
  46. S. Mohr (2012), Managerialism and its impact on social work, presentato al convegno «The International “Social Work and Society” Academy», 27-29 agosto, Bucharest.
  47. S.P. Osborne (2006), «The New Public Governance», Public Management Review, 8, 3, pp. 377-87.
  48. S. Portillo (2008), The Face of the State: Social Status and Official Position in the Mobilization of Authority, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Public Administration, Lawrence, University of Kansas.
  49. J.M. Prottas (1978), «The Power of the Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies», Urban Affaires Quarterly, 13, 3, pp. 285-312,
  50. J.M. Prottas (1979), People‐Processing: The Street‐Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies, Lexington (MA), Lexington Press.
  51. N.M. Riccucci (2005), How Management Matters: Street‐Level Bureaucrats and Welfare Reform, Washington, Georgetown University Press.
  52. R.C. Rist (1973), The Urban School: A Factory for Failure, Boston, Mit Press.
  53. J.R. Sandfort (2000), «Moving Beyond Discretion and Outcomes: Examining Public Management from the Front Lines of the Welfare State», Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 4, pp. 729-56,
  54. P. Saunders (1986), Social Theory and the Urban Question, London, Hutchinson, 2nd ed.
  55. E.B. Sharp (1980), «Toward a New Understanding of Urban Services and Citizen Participation: The Coproduction Concept», Midwest Review of Public Administration, 14, pp. 105-18, DOI: 10.1177/027507408001400203
  56. H. Simon (1947), Administrative Behavior, New York, Macmillan.
  57. J. Skolnick, J. Fyfe (1993), Above the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force, New York, Free Press.
  58. J. Soss (2000), Unwanted Claims: The Politics of Participation in the US Welfare System, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
  59. W. Tousijn, M. Dellavalle (a c. di) (2017), Logica professionale e logica manageriale. Una ricerca sulle professioni sociali, Bologna, il Mulino.
  60. M. Tsui, F.C.H. Cheung (2004), «Gone with the Wind: The Impacts of Managerialism on Human Services», British Journal of Social Work, 34, 3, pp. 437-442,
  61. L.G. Tummers (2011), «Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement New Policies: A Policy Alienation Framework», International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 3, pp. 555-81, DOI: 10.1177/0020852311407364
  62. L.G. Tummers, V. Bekkers (2014), «Policy Implementation, Street-Level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion», Public Management Review, 16, 4, pp. 527-547, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
  63. L.G Tummers, V.J.J.M Bekkers, A.J. Steijn (2009), «Policy alienation of public professionals: Application in a New Public Management context», Public Management Review, 11, 5, pp. 685-706, DOI: 10.1080/14719030902798230
  64. L.G. Tummers, V.J.J.M Bekkers, E. Vink, M. Musheno (2015), «Coping during Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature», Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, pp. 1099-126,
  65. R. Van Berkel, B. Valkenburg (2007), Making it Personal, Bristol, The Policy Press.
  66. A. Vardanega (2008), L’analisi dei dati qualitativi con Atlas.ti, Fare ricerca sociale con i dati testuali, Roma, Aracne.
  67. S. Walker (1993), Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice 1950-1990, New York, Oxford University Press.
  68. R. Weatherly, M. Lipsky (1977), «Street-level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special Education Reform», Harvard Educational Review, 47, pp. 171-97,

Laura Cataldi, Valeria Cappellato, Rappresentazioni e identità degli operatori sociali come street-level bureaucrats e situated agents in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 121/2020, pp 90-113, DOI: 10.3280/SR2020-121005