Theory and Practice for Understanding Process and Outcomes of Transformative Learning

Titolo Rivista EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Autori/Curatori Claudio Melacarne, Alessandra Romano
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2018/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 20 P. 214-233 Dimensione file 204 KB
DOI 10.3280/ERP2018-002014
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The article offers a critical review of the tools available to evaluate transformative learning process and outcomes. In the literature, there are different approaches to validate and use these tools, confirming that Transformative Learning Theory is a multi-layers theory. We would like to: 1) show the state of the art of assessment perspectives in TLT; 2) define a framework to categorize them; 3) depict a possible evolution of TL assessment approaches. Starting from this backdrop, in the second section of the article, we describe how and to what extent an on-line tool (Doctors’ Perspective Inventory) has been constructed and adapted to manage continuing educational activities for doctors in the framework of the transformative learning theory and professional development. The DPI is a quantitative, multi-language and self-respondent survey based on a Likert scale that is grounded on the TPI model (Teaching Perspective Inventory, Pratt, 1998). The thesis we will present is that the administration of this tool could support to plan organizational devices and transformative learning paths for professional development of community of practitioners within medical institutions

  1. Allsop J. (1994), Two Sides to Every Story: Complainants’ and Doctors’ Perspectives in Disputes about Medical Care in a General Practice Setting. Law & Policy, 16: 149-183.
  2. Argyris C. & Schön D. (1978). Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Arnold P. & Kumar S. (2014). Crossing Professional Thresholds with Networked Learning? An analysis of student e-portfolios using the threshold concept perspective. In: Bayne S., Jones C., de Laat M., Tyberg T., Sinclair C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning, 9-16.
  4. Barello S., Graffigna G. (2016). Engagement-sensitive decision making: training doctors to sustain patient engagement in medical consultations. In: Patient Engagement: A Consumer-Centered Model to Innovate Healthcare. Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
  5. Baxter Magolda M. B. (1992), Students’ epistemologies and academic experiences: implications for pedagogy. Review of Higher Education, 15(3): 265-87.
  6. Billet S., Harteis C., Gruber H. (2014). International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Berlin: Springer.
  7. Bracci F. (2017). L’apprendimento adulto. Metodologie didattiche ed esperienze trasformative. Unicopli: Milano.
  8. Brock S. E. (2010). Measuring the importance of precursor steps to transformative learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(2): 122-142.
  9. Brook S., Florescu I., & Teran L. (2012). Tools for Change: An Examination of Transformative Learning and Its Precursor Steps in Undergraduate Students. International Scholarly Research Notices -- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2012/234125.
  10. Brown K. M. (2005). Transformative adult learning strategies#: Assessing the impact on pre-service administrators’ beliefs. Educational Considerations, 32(2): 17-26.
  11. Carley C. (1993). Coding Choices for Textual Analysis. A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23: 75-126.
  12. Chan D., Gan Goh L. (2000). The doctor-patient relationship: a survey of attitudes and practices of doctors in Singapore. Bioethics, 14(1): 58-76.
  13. Cheney R. (2010). Empirical measurement of perspective transformation, 1999-2009. In: 29th Annual Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference In Adult, Continuing, Community and Extension Education, 57-62.
  14. Cox R.C. (2017). Assessing Transformative Learning: Toward a Unified Framework. (PhD diss.). University of Tennessee. -- http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4616.
  15. Cranton P. (1994). Understanding and Promoting Transformative Learning: A Guide for Educators of Adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  16. Cranton P. & Hoggan C. (2012). Evaluating transformative learning. In: Taylor E.W. & Cranton P. (Eds.). The Handbook of Transformative Learning (pp. 37-55). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Cunti A. (2014). Formarsi alla cura riflessiva. Tra esistenza e professione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  18. Fabbri L. (2011). Trajectories of Professional Culture Transformation. Fostering Learning Stories through Reflective Conversations. Educational Reflective Practices, 1-2: 37-55.
  19. Fabbri L. (2018a). Transformative Learning and Transdisciplinary Connections. Towards a Situated Critical Reflection. In: Fabbri L., Formenti L., Kokkos A., Melacarne C. & Nicolaides A. Transformative Learning Approaches Beyond Transformative Learning Theory. Procedings of 3rd Biennial Conference: Contemporary Dilemmas and Learning for Transformation (ESREA).
  20. Fabbri L. & Bianchi F. (2018b) (Eds.). Fare ricerca collaborativa. Vita quotidiana, cura, lavoro [Doing collaborative research. Daily life, care, and work]. Roma: Carocci.
  21. Fedeli M. & Coryell J. (2014). Investigating teaching and learning methods in Italian universities and beyond. The quest to improve and share practices and strategies in the international higher education context. Educational Reflective Practices, 1-2: 35-50.
  22. Fenwick T. (2003). Learning through experience: Troubling assumptions and expanding questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
  23. Formenti L. & Dirx J. (2014). A dialogical reframing. Journal of Transformative Education, 12(2): 123-133.
  24. Formenti L. & Jorio F. (2018). Multiple Visions, Multiple Voices. A Dialogic Methodology for Teaching in Higher Education. Journal of transformative education, 2: 1-20.
  25. Freire P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herter and Herter.
  26. Habermas J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.
  27. Hoggan C. & Cranton P. (2015). Promoting transformative learning through reading fiction, Journal of Transformative Education, 13(1): 6-25.
  28. Kember D., Leung D., Jones A. & Loke A. Y. (2000). Development of a Questionnaire to Measure the Level of Reflective Thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25: 380-395.
  29. Kilgoreand D. & Bloom L. (2002). When I’m Down, It Takes Me a While: Rethinking Transformational Education through Narratives of Women in Crisis. Adult Basic Education, 12(3): 123-133.
  30. King K. (1998). A guide to perspective transformation and learning activities: The Learning Activities Survey. Leadership, Counseling, Adult, Career and Higher Education Faculty Publications. -- https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/ehe_facpub/73.
  31. King K. (2009). The handbook of the evolving research of transformative learning based on the learning activities survey. Charlotte, NC: IAP, Information Age Pub.
  32. Kitchenham A. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(2): 104-123.
  33. Kokkos A. (2012a). Could transformative learning be appreciated in Europe? Journal of Transformative Education, 12(2): 180-196.
  34. Kokkos A. (2012b). Transformative learning in Europe: An overview of the theoretical perspectives. In: Taylor E. W., Cranton P. (Eds.). Handbook of Transformative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 289-303.
  35. Kovan J. T. & Dirkx J. (2003). Being called awake: the role of transformative learning in the lives of environmental activists. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(2): 99-118.
  36. Kuhn T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  37. Kumar S. & Arnold P. (2014). Assessing Transformational Learning in Online Professional Programs: Methodological Approaches and Challenges. In: Teixeira A. M. & Szűcs A. (Eds.). Challenges for Research into Open & Distance Learning: Doing Things Better – Doing Better Things. Oxford, UK: EDEN (Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network 2014 Research Workshop Oxford, UK), 173-184.
  38. Land R. & Meyer J. (2010). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Dynamics of Assessment. In: Meyer J., Land R. & Baillie C. (Eds.). Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 53-64). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
  39. Laros A., Fuhr T., & Taylor E. W. (2017) (Eds.). Transformative Learning Meets Bildung: An International Exchange. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
  40. Latour B. (1978). The power of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1): 264-280.
  41. Lethbridge K., Andrusyszyn M. & Iwasiw C. (2013). Assessing the psychometric properties of Kember and Leung’s Reflection Questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3): 303-325.
  42. Marsick V. (2009). Toward a unifying framework to support informal learning theory, research and practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(4): 265-275.
  43. Meerkerk E. (2017). Teacher Logbooks and Professional Development: A Tool for Assessing Transformative Learning Processes. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16: 1-8.
  44. Melacarne C. (2018). Supporting Informal Learning in Higher Education Internship. In: Vanna B. & Fedeli M. (Eds.). Employability and Competences. Innovative Curricula for New Professions (pp. 51-63). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  45. Melacarne C. & Giampaolo M. (2018). Supporting situated learning in higher education internships. In International Transformative Learning Conference.
  46. Mezirow J. (1978). Perspective transformation. Adult Education Quarterly, 28(2): 100-110.
  47. Mezirow J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  48. Mezirow J. (1991). The Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  49. Mezirow J. (1994). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(2): 222-232.
  50. Mezirow J. (2003). Transformative Learning as Discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1): 58-63.
  51. Mezirow J. (2012). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In: Taylor E. W., Cranton P. & Associates (Eds.). The Handbook of Transformative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 73-95). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  52. Mezirow J., & Associates (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  53. Mylopoulos M., Scardamalia M. (2008). Doctors’ perspectives on their innovations in daily practice: implications for knowledge building in health care. Medical Education, 42: 975-981.
  54. Neal J. (2018) (Ed.). Handbook of Personal and Organizational Transformation. New York: Springer.
  55. Perkins D. (1994). The Intelligent Eye: Learning to Think by Looking at Art. The Getty Education Institute for the Arts.
  56. Pratt Daniel D. and Collins John B. (2000). The Teaching Perspectives Inventory (TPI). Adult Education Research Conference. http://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2000/papers/68.
  57. Rachlis M. (2004). Prescription for Excellence: how Innovation is saving Canada’s Healthcare System. Toronto, Canada: Harper Collins Canada.
  58. Romano A. (2014). Promoting reflexivity through drama. Educational Practices of the Theatre of the Oppressed. Educational Reflective Practices, 1: 131-145.
  59. Romano A. (2017). The challenge of the assessment of processes and outcomes of transformative learning. Educational Reflective Practices, 1: 184-219.
  60. Rossi B. (2018). Il potere dell’educazione. Roma: Studium.
  61. Schepers R. (2006). Regulation and trust in action: The subtle balance between doctors and management in two Belgian hospitals. Current Sociology, 54(4): 637-648.
  62. Stuckey H. L., Taylor E. W. & Cranton P. (2013). Developing a survey of transformative learning outcomes and processes based on theoretical perspectives. Journal of Transformative Education, 11(4): 211-228.
  63. Taylor E.W. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: a critical review of the empirical research (1999-2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2): 173-191.
  64. Taylor E.W. (2014). Empathy: The Stepchild of Critical Reflection and Transformative Learning. Educational Reflective Practices, 2: 5-22.
  65. Taylor E.W. & Cranton P. (Eds.) (2012). The Handbook of Transformative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  66. Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Yorks L. & Kasl E. (2012). Toward a theory and practices for whole-person learning: reconceptualizing experience and role of affect. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(2): 176-192.

  • European Perspectives on Transformation Theory Claudio Melacarne, pp.193 (ISBN:978-3-030-19158-0)

Claudio Melacarne, Alessandra Romano, Theory and Practice for Understanding Process and Outcomes of Transformative Learning in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 2/2018, pp 214-233, DOI: 10.3280/ERP2018-002014