Is the collaborative consumption the new buying? Social and economic aspects influencing collaborative consumption

Author/s Francesca De Canio, Davide Pellegrini, Elisa Martinelli
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/1 Language English
Pages 20 P. 19-38 File size 1173 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2018-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Collaborative consumption is becoming a phenomenon of great interest for both scholars, marketers and public institutions. The spread of peer-to-peer sharing platforms allows consumers to acquire products and services in alternative ways. This aspect is redesigning a number of sectors, such as transport and accommodation marketplaces with the spread of new business models that provide consumers with both economic (financial) and social (socialization, sustainable consumption) benefits. Albeit in presence of an extensive emerging literature on the collaborative consumption phenomenon, the effect of social and economic benefits on the usage of collaborative products and services is lacking. Thus, using a Structural Equation Model, tested on 385 Italian collaborative users, this study aims at identifying antecedents of sharing intention (sustainable consumption and consumers’ innovativeness) and of the intention to use Blablacar (social and economic benefits). Furthermore, the direct relationship between the two intentions is examined. Implications are discussed.

Keywords: Collaborative consumption, sharing theory, social benefits, economic benefits, blablacar, structural equation modelling.

  1. Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2): 179-211. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Akbar P., Mai R. and Hoffmann S. (2016). When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems. Journal of Business Research, 69(10): 4215-4224.
  3. Anderson J.C. and Gerbing D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3): 411. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  4. Arcidiacono D., Mainieri M. and Pais I. (2016). Quando la sharing economy fa innovazione sociale. Il caso BlaBlaCar.
  5. Arnould E.J. and Rose A.S. (2016). Mutuality Critique and substitute for Belk’s “sharing”. Marketing Theory, 16(1): 75-99. DOI: 10.1177/1470593115572669
  6. Bagozzi R.P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. The Journal of Marketing, 39(4): 32-39. DOI: 10.2307/1250593
  7. Bardhi F. and Eckhardt G.M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4): 881-898. DOI: 10.1086/666376
  8. Belk R. (2007). Why not share rather than own? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1): 126-140. DOI: 10.1177/0002716206298483
  9. Belk R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5): 715-734. DOI: 10.1086/612649
  10. Belk R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8): 1595-1600.
  11. Belk R. (2016). Accept no substitutes: A reply to Arnould and Rose. Marketing Theory, 16(1): 143-149. DOI: 10.1177/1470593115622720
  12. Blablacar (2017). 2.5 milioni di utenti e 1.5 miliardi di chilometri offerti: BlaBlaCar festeggia i primi 5 anni del carpooling in Italia. -- Available at:
  13. Botsman R. and Rogers R. (2011). What’s mine is yours: how collaborative consumption is changing the way we live. London: Collins.
  14. Chen L. (2015). Meet Europe’s Newest Unicorn: BlaBlaCar raises $200 Million at $ 1.6 Billion Valuation. -- Available at:
  15. Dillet R. (2017). BlaBlaCar unveils BlaBlaLines, a new app for daily commutes. -- Available at:
  16. Ertz M., Durif F. and Arcand M. (2016). Collaborative Consumption or the Rise of the Two-Sided Consumer. The International Journal of Business & Management, 4(6): 195-206.
  17. European Commission (2016a). Results of the public consultation on the regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative economy. -- Published: 26 January 2016. --Available at:
  18. European Commission (2016b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy. Published: 2 June 2016. -- Available at:
  19. Fornell C. and Larcker D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
  20. Gansky L. (2010). The Mesh: Why the Future of Business is Sharing. New York, NY: Portfolio.
  21. Giesler M. (2006). Consumer gift systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2): 283-290. DOI: 10.1086/506309
  22. Gummesson E. (2011). 2B or not 2B: That is the question. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2): 190-192.
  23. Habibi M.R., Davidson A. and Laroche M. (2017). What managers should know about the sharing economy. Business Horizons, 60(1): 113-121.
  24. Hamari J., Sjöklint M. and Ukkonen A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9): 2047-2059.
  25. Heo C.Y. (2016). Sharing economy and prospects in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 58(c): 166-170.
  26. Hu L.T. and Bentler P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1): 1-55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  27. Huang S. and Hsu C.H. (2009). Effects of travel motivation, past experience, perceived constraint, and attitude on revisit intention. Journal of Travel Research, 48(1): 29-44. DOI: 10.1177/0047287508328793
  28. John N.A. (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16(3): 113-131. DOI: 10.1080/10714421.2013.807119
  29. Lamberton C.P. and Rose R.L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(4): 109-125.
  30. Mahadevan B. (2000). Business models for Internet-based e-commerce: An anatomy. California management review, 42(4): 55-69.
  31. Martin C.L. (2016). Retrospective: compatibility management: customer-to-customer relationships in service environments. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(1): 11-15. DOI: 10.1108/JSM-10-2015-0319
  32. Möhlmann M. (2015). Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(3): 193-207.
  33. Pellegrini D. and De Canio F. (2017). The new social game. The sharing economy and the Digital Revolution: An insight into changes in consumer habits. Milano: Egea.
  34. Piscicelli L., Cooper T. and Fisher T. (2015). The role of values in collaborative consumption: insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97: 21-29.
  35. Price L.L. and Belk R.W. (2016). Consumer Ownership and Sharing: Introduction to the Issue. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1(2): 193-197. DOI: 10.1086/686270
  36. Sharma P. (2010). Measuring personal cultural orientations: scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(6): 787-806.
  37. Sherry J.F. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2): 157-168. DOI: 10.1086/208956
  38. Tussyadiah I. P. (2016a). Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 55: 70-80.
  39. Tussyadiah I.P. (2015). An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel. In: Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015 (pp. 817-830). Springer International Publishing.
  40. Tussyadiah I.P. (2016b). The influence of innovativeness on on-site smartphone use among american travelers: Implications for context-based push marketing. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 33(6): 806-823. DOI: 10.1080/10548408.2015.1068263
  41. Vargo S.L. and Lusch R.F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1): 1-17.
  42. Vargo S.L. and Lusch R.F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1): 46-67.

Francesca De Canio, Davide Pellegrini, Elisa Martinelli, Is the collaborative consumption the new buying? Social and economic aspects influencing collaborative consumption in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 1/2018, pp 19-38, DOI: 10.3280/MC2018-001003