A further failed attempt to identify the "system principle" of the social security system.

Author/s Mattia Persiani
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/157
Language Italian Pages 5 P. 169-173 File size 141 KB
DOI 10.3280/GDL2018-157005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The constitutional Court, with judgment 250/2017, has rejected the various challenges of unconstitutionality raised against the law that had reformed the automatic revaluation system, following the suggestions expressed by the same Court in its judgment from 2015. However, the legal reasoning of the recent judgment is based solely upon arguments mainly referring to the contingency/the entity of the benefit and the alleged margins of resistance to the erosion of the retirement benefits’ purchasing power. Therefore, the expected indications on both the function of our social security system and - consequently - the "system principle" that should inspire it are missing.

Keywords: Reasonablness; Adequacy; Proportionality; System principle; Social security sys-tem.

Mattia Persiani, Ancora un tentativo non riuscito di individuare il principio costituzionale di sistema in materia previdenziale in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 157/2018, pp 169-173, DOI: 10.3280/GDL2018-157005