A compass to an understanding of couple dynamics: The plan formulation method for couples (PFMC)

Author/s Martina Rodomonti, Valeria Crisafulli, Silvia Mazzoni, Francesco Gazzillo
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2018/4
Language Italian Pages 19 P. 659-677 File size 261 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2018-004007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Control-Mastery Theory (CMT) is a cognitive-psychodynamic theory of psy-chological functioning and psychopathology (Weiss, 1993; Gazzillo, 2016), em-pirically validated by the San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group (1986). A central tenet of CMT is that people who seek for psychotherapy are guided by an unconscious plan (Weiss, 1993; Silberschatz, 2005, 2008). Such unconscious plan provides for the realization of healthy and pleasant goals and the discon-firmation of the pathogenic beliefs that have developed as a consequence of childhood traumatic experiences and which hinder the patient in his adaptation efforts. Even in everyday life people test their pathogenic beliefs and intimate relationships, thanks to the stability and the emotional involvement that they imply, represent an ideal context for the partners to try to disconfirm their respec-tive pathogenic beliefs (Zeitlin, 1991), hoping to receive different responses from those received by their traumatic caregivers. When this does not happen, the couple develops negative experiences and symptoms, which may encourage partners to seek for a psychotherapeutic treatment. We hypothesize that not only individuals but also couples are guided by an unconscious plan at the beginning of the therapy and the aim of our work is to provide guidelines for the Formula-tion of the Couple’s Plan. The couple’s plan includes goals, obstructions, individ-ual and couple traumas, vicious circles such as the matching of pathogenic be-liefs of both partners that generate dysfunctional patterns, virtuous circles which guarantee members of the couple to feel safe in the relationship, and finally the insights. The formulation of each component will be explained with the help of a clinical case and the results of the self-report measures used - the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15 (IGRS-15, Gazzillo et al., 2017) and the Pathogen-ic/Problematic Beliefs Scale (PBS; Silberschatz, 2016) - will be reported. The couple’s plan represents a method of assessment and intervention in the work with conjugal and parental dyads, which is useful both to the therapist - especial-ly to the young therapist – to orientate himself in the clinical work, both to the researcher, to understand the dysfunctional dynamics underlying individual and dyadic suffering.

Keywords: Control-Mastery Theory, couple therapy, couple’s plan, plan for-mulation method for couples.

  1. Andolfi, M. (1999). La crisi della coppia. Milano: Cortina editore.
  2. Andolfi, M., Falcucci, M., Mascellani, A., Santona, A., & Sciamplicotti, F. (2006). La terapia di coppia in una prospettiva trigenerazionale. Roma (Accademia di Psicoterapia alla Famiglia).
  3. Bush, M., & Gassner, S. (1986). The immediate effect of the analyst’s termination interventions on the patient’s resistance to termination. In J. Weiss, H. Sampson, & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (Eds.), The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation & empirical research (pp. 299-320). New York: Guildford Press.
  4. Christensen, A., Atkins, D.C., Berns, S., Wheeler, J., Baucom, D.H., & Simpson, L.E. (2004). Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 72(2), 176. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.176
  5. Curtis, J.T., & Silberschatz, G. (1991). The Plan Formulation Method: A reliable procedure for case formulation. Unpublished manuscript.
  6. Curtis, J.T., & Silberschatz, G. (2005). The Assessment of Pathogenic Beliefs. In G. Silberschatz, Transformative Relationship: The Control-Mastery Theory of Psychotherapy (pp. 69-91). New York: Routledge.
  7. Curtis, J.T., & Silberschatz, G. (2007). “Plan formulation method”. In EELLIS, T.D. Handbook of Psychotherapy Case Formulation (II ed.) (pp. 198-220). New York: Guilford.
  8. Curtis, J.T., Silberschatz, G., Sampson, H., & Weiss, J. (1994). The plan formulation method. Psychotherapy Research, 4(3-4), 197-207. DOI: 10.1080/10503309412331334032
  9. Davidov, M., Zahn‐Waxler, C., Roth‐Hanania, R., & Knafo, A. (2013). Concern for others in the first year of life: Theory, evidence, and avenues for research. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 126-131.
  10. Fretter, P.B. (1995). A control-mastery case formulation of a successful treatment for major depression. In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 1(2), 3-17.
  11. Fretter, P.B., Bucci, W., Broitman, J., Silberschatz, G., & Curtis, J.T. (1994). How the patient’s plan relates to the concept of transference. Psychotherapy Research, 4(1), 58-72. DOI: 10.1080/10503309412331333902
  12. Gazzillo, F. (2016). Fidarsi dei pazienti. Introduzione alla Control-Mastery Theory. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  13. Gazzillo, F., Gorman, B., Bush, M., Silberschatz, G., Mazza, C., Faccini, F., & De Luca, E. (2017). Reliability and Validity of the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15: A New Clinician-Reporting Tool for Assessing Interpersonal Guilt According to Control-Mastery Theory. Psychodynamic psychiatry, 45(3), 362-384.
  14. Gollan, J.K., & Jacobson, N.S. (2002). Developments in couple therapy research. In H.A. Liddle, D.A. Santisteban, R.F. Levant, & J.H. Bray (Eds.), Family psychology: Science-based interventions (pp. 105-122). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  15. Gurman, A.S., Lebow, J.L., & Snyder, D.K. (Eds.). (2015). Clinical handbook of couple therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
  16. Horowitz, L.M., Sampson, H., Siegelman, E.Y., Wolfson, A., & Weiss, J. (1975). On the identification of warded-off mental contents: An empirical and methodological contribution. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84(5), 545.
  17. Jacobson, N.S., Schmaling, K.B., & Holtzworth‐Munroe, A. (1987). Component analysis of behavioral marital therapy: 2‐year follow‐up and prediction of relapse. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13(2), 187-195.
  18. Lebow, J.L., Chambers, A.L., Christensen, A., & Johnson, S.M. (2012). Research on the treatment of couple distress. Journal of Marital and Family therapy, 38(1), 145-168.
  19. O’Connor, L.E., Berry, J.W., Weiss, J., Bush, M., & Sampson, H. (1997). Interpersonal guilt: The development of a new measure. Journal of clinical psychology, 53(1), 73-89.
  20. Pole, N., Ablon, J.S., & O’Connor, L.E. (2008). Using psychodynamic, cognitive behavioral, and control mastery prototypes to predict change: A new look at an old paradigm for long-term single-case research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 221. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.221
  21. Pole, N., Ablon, J.S., O’Connor, L.E., & Weiss, J. (2002). Ideal control mastery technique correlates with change in a single case. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39(1), 88. DOI: 10.1037/0033-3204.39.1.88
  22. Shadish, W.R., & Baldwin, S.A. (2003). Meta‐analysis of MFT interventions. Journal of Marital and Family therapy, 29(4), 547-570.
  23. Silberschatz, G. (1978). Effects of the analyst’s neutrality on the patient’s feelings and behavior in the psychoanalytic situation. Dissertation Abstract International, 39, 3007B (University Microfilms No. 78-24, 277).
  24. Silberschatz, G. (1986). Testing pathogenic beliefs. In J. Weiss, H. Sampson, & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (Eds.), The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation & empirical research (pp. 256-266). New York: Guildford Press.
  25. Silberschatz, G. (2005). Transformative relationships: The control-mastery theory of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  26. Silberschatz, G. (2008). How patients work on their plans and test their therapists in psychotherapy. Smith College Studies In Social Work, 78(2-3), 275-286. DOI: 10.1080/00377310802114528
  27. Silberschatz, G. (2015). Improving the yield of psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 11, 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1076202
  28. Silberschatz, G., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2016). Pathogenic beliefs mediate the relationship between perceived negative parenting and psychopathology symptoms. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(3), 258-275. DOI: 10.1080/10926771.2016.1259279
  29. Silberschatz, G., & Curtis, J.T. (1993). Measuring the therapist’s impact on the patient’s therapeutic progress. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 403. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.61.3.403
  30. Silberschatz, G., Fretter, P.B., & Curtis, J.T. (1986a). How do interpretations influence the process of psychotherapy? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(5), 646. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.54.5.646
  31. Silberschatz, G., Sampson, H., & Weiss, J. (1986b). Testing pathogenic beliefs versus seeking transference gratifications. In J. Weiss, H. Sampson, & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (Eds.). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation & empirical research (pp. 267-276). New York: Guildford Press.
  32. Snyder, D.K. (1999). Affective reconstruction in the context of a pluralistic approach to couple therapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6(4), 348-365.
  33. Snyder, D.K., & Halford, W.K. (2012). Evidence-based couple therapy: Current status and future directions. Journal of Family Therapy, 34(3), 229-249.
  34. Snyder, D.K., Castellani, A.M., & Whisman, M.A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317-344.
  35. Snyder, D.K., Wills, R.M., & Grady-Fletcher, A. (1991) Long-term effectiveness of behavioral versus insight-oriented marital therapy: a four-year follow-up study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 138-141. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006X.59.1.138
  36. Sprenkle, D.H. (2003). Effectiveness research in marriage and family therapy: Introduction. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29(1), 85-96.
  37. Weiss, J. (1993). How psychotherapy works: Process and technique. New York: Guilford Press.
  38. Weiss, J., Sampson, H., & Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation, and empirical research. New York: Guilford Press.
  39. Zahn-Waxler, C., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1990). The origins of empathic concern. Motivation and emotion, 14(2), 107-130. DOI: 10.1007/BF0099163
  40. Zeitlin, D.J. (1991). Control-Mastery theory in couples therapy. Family Therapy, 18(3), 201.

  • Description and First Steps Toward the Empirical Validation of the Plan Formulation Method for Couples Martina Rodomonti, Valeria Crisafulli, Sveva Angrisani, Emma De Luca, Silvia Mazzoni, Francesco Gazzillo, in Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy /2022 pp.227
    DOI: 10.1007/s10879-022-09534-x

Martina Rodomonti, Valeria Crisafulli, Silvia Mazzoni, Francesco Gazzillo, Una bussola per la comprensione delle dinamiche di coppia: il metodo per la formulazione del piano della coppia (MFPc) in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 4/2018, pp 659-677, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2018-004007