Journal title RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Author/s Gregorio Baldin
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/3 Language English
Pages 30 P. 401-430 File size 127 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
This article investigates the traces of Bacon’s concept of spiritus in Hobbes’s natural philosophy. During the 1620s, Hobbes met frequently with Bacon, and he even knew some important works by Bacon. However, Hobbes scholars have often simply compared the philosophies of Bacon and Hobbes, without searching for a precise Baconian legacy in Hobbes’s thought. Here I examine Hobbes’s concept of internal spirits as it emerges in the 1641 debate with Descartes. This concept seems to echo some features of Bacon’s notion of spiritus. This concept holds different meanings in Bacon’s works, but the Lord Chancellor used it to formulate a theory of hardness and softness which seems to have influenced Hobbes’s own theory of hardness. An analysis of this topic allows me to examine Hobbes’s important concept of internal spirits and its link with another pivotal notion of his physics: conatus. Nevertheless, Hobbes’s theory of hardness does not merely reveal his debt towards Bacon; it also reveals the originality of his philosophy, an originality that also emerges from a comparison of Bacon and Hobbes’s theories of sense. Bacon’s significant legacy emerges when we examine this topic. However, Bacon’s theory also differs from that of Hobbes since it is not completely mechanistic, unlike that of Hobbes.
Keywords: Hobbes, Bacon, spirit, spiritus, mechanism
Gregorio Baldin, Francis Bacon’s Concept of spiritus and Thomas Hobbes in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 3/2019, pp 401-430, DOI: 10.3280/SF2019-003001