Spatial quantile regressions for the analysis of regional economic convergence

Journal title RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO
Author/s Alfredo Cartone, Paolo Postiglione
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3 Language Italian
Pages 21 P. 28-48 File size 391 KB
DOI 10.3280/REST2016-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In the last decade, a noteworthy issue in regional economic growth studies has been represented by the convergence problem. Many researchers, according to Solow’s neoclassical growth model (1956), have noted that per-worker GDPs of poor regions tend to converge to those of richer regions. The assessment of this empirical tendency is a matter of primary relevance for policy makers. In this article the approach used is that of β-convergence (Barro and Sala-i-Martin, 1995). The paper estimates the conditional β-convergence model for 103 Italian provinces that correspond to NUTS 3 level of European Territorial Nomenclature.
Methods and Results
This study adopts a quantile regression approach that allows for the inclusion of spatial effects (McMillen, 2013). The model considered is a spatial Durbin specification of quantile regression estimated through a Double Stage Quantile Regression approach (Kim and Muller, 2004). The results highlight the importance of accounting for spatial dependence to increase representativeness and improve the estimated coefficients in the case of geographically distributed observations.
Conclusions
The empirical evidence shows that per-worker GDP, human capital, the savings rate and the rate of population growth influence have significant different behaviour depending on the quantile observed. These results enable us to carry out considerations on different paths of development of the Italian provinces and on effects of heterogeneous spillover.

Keywords: Conditional β-convergence, spatial quantile, spatial econometrics, spatial heterogeneity, Italian provinces

Jel codes: C01; C14; C21; C36; C52; O47

  1. Andreano M.S., Benedetti R., Postiglione P. (2016), Spatial Regimes in Regional European Growth: An Iterated Spatially Weighted Regression Approach, Quality & Quantity, Springer.
  2. Anselin L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Arbia G., Basile R. (2005), Spatial Dependence and Non-linearities in Regional Growth Behaviour in Italy, Statistica, 65, 2, pp. 145-167.
  4. Barreto R.A., Hughes A.W. (2004), Under Performers and over Achievers: A Quantile Regression Analysis of Growth, Economic Record, 248, pp. 17-35.
  5. Barro R.J. (1991), Economic Growth in a Cross-section of Countries, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 407-443.
  6. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. (1991), Convergence across States and Regions, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 22, pp. 107-182.
  7. Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin X. (1995), Economic Growth Theory. Boston: Mc Graw-Hill.
  8. Baumol W.J. (1986), Productivity Growth, Convergence and Welfare: What the Long-run Data show, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 1072-1085.
  9. Bera A., Galvao A., Montes-Rojas G., Park S.Y. (2015), Asymmetric Laplace Regression: Maximum Likelihood, Maximum Entropy and Quantile Regression, Journal of Econometric Methods, 5, pp. 79-101.
  10. Buchinsky M. (1998), Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research, Journal of Human Resources, 33, 1, pp. 88-126.
  11. Canarella G., Pollard S. (2004), Parameter Heterogeneity in the Neoclassical Growth Model: A Quantile Regression Approach, Journal of Economic Development, 29, pp. 1-32.
  12. Chernozhukov V., Hansen C. (2005), An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects, Econometrica, 73, 1, pp. 245-261.
  13. Chernozhukov V., Hansen C. (2006), Instrumental Quantile Regression Inference for Structural and Treatment Effect Models, Journal of Econometrics, 132, pp. 491-525.
  14. Cunningham B.M. (2003), The Distributional Heterogeneity of Growth Effects: Some Evidence, The Manchester School, 7, 1, pp. 218-231.
  15. Dall’erba S., Le Gallo J. (2008), Regional Convergence and the Impact of European Structural Funds over 1989-1999: A Spatial Econometric Analysis, Papers in Regional Science, 87, pp. 219-244.
  16. Elhorst J.P. (2014), Spatial Econometrics. From cross-sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Berlin: Springer.
  17. Ertur C., Le GalloJ., Baumont C. (2006), The European Regional Convergence Process, 1980-1995: Do Spatial Regimes and Spatial Dependence matter?, International Regional Science Review, 29, pp. 3-34.
  18. Friedman M. (1992), Do Old Fallacies ever die?, Journal of Economic Literature, 30, pp. 2129-2132.
  19. Geraci M., Bottai M. (2006), Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Data using the Asymmetric Laplace Distribution, Biostatistics, 8, pp. 140-154.
  20. Kelejian H.H., Prucha I.R. (1999), A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model, International Economic Review, 40, pp. 509-533.
  21. Kim T., Muller C. (2004), Two-stage Quantile Regression when the First Stage is based on Quantile Regression, The Econometrics Journal, 7, pp. 218-231.
  22. Koenker R. (2005), Quantile Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Koenker R., Bassett G. (1978), Regression Quantiles, Econometrica, 46, pp. 33-50.
  24. Koenker R., d’Orey V. (1987), Computing Regression Quantiles, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 36, pp. 383-393.
  25. Koenker R., Hallock K.F. (2001), Quantile Regression, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, pp. 143-156.
  26. Koenker R., Machado J.A.F. (1999), Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile Regression, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, pp. 1296-1310.
  27. Kostov P. (2009), Spatial Dependence in Agricultural Land Prices: Does it exist?, Agricultural Economics, 40, pp. 347-353.
  28. Kostov P. (2013), Empirical Likelihood Estimation of the Spatial Quantile Regression, Journal of Geographical Systems, 15, pp. 51-69.
  29. Kostov P., Le Gallo J. (2015), Convergence: A Story of Quantiles and Spillovers, Kyklos, 68, pp. 552-576.
  30. LeSage J.P. (2014), What Regional Scientists need to know about Spatial Econometrics, The Review of Regional Studies, 44, pp. 3-32.
  31. LeSage J.P., Fischer M.M. (2008), Spatial Growth Regressions: Model Specification, Estimation and Interpretation, Spatial Economic Analysis, 3, pp. 275-304.
  32. LeSage J.P., Pace R.K. (2009), Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  33. Liao W.C., Wang X. (2012), Hedonic House Prices and Spatial Quantile Regression, Journal of Housing Economics, 21, pp. 16-27.
  34. Lucas R. (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 1, pp. 3-42.
  35. Mankiw N.G., Romer D., Weil D.N. (1992), A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 7, pp. 407-437.
  36. McMillen D.P. (2013), Quantile Regression for Spatial Data. New York: Springer.
  37. Mello M., Perrelli R. (2003), Growth Equations: A Quantile Regression Exploration, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 43: 4, pp. 643-667.
  38. Panzera D., Postiglione P. (2014), Economic Growth in Italian NUTS 3 Provinces, The Annals of Regional Science, 53, pp. 273-293.
  39. Postiglione P., Andreano M.S., Benedetti R. (2013), Using Constrained Optimization for the Identification of Convergence Clubs, Computational Economics, 42, pp. 151-174.
  40. Postiglione P., Benedetti R., Lafratta G. (2010), A Regression Tree Algorithm for the Identification of Convergence Clubs, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54, pp. 2776-2785.
  41. Rey S.J., Montouri B.D. (1999), US Regional Income Convergence: A Spatial Econometric Perspective, Regional Studies, 33, pp. 143-156.
  42. Sala-i-Martin X. (1996), Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence, European Economic Review, 40, pp. 1325-1352.
  43. Solow R.M. (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, pp. 65-94.
  44. Su L., Yang Z. (2007), Instrumental Variable Quantile Estimation of Spatial Autoregressive Model, Working Paper 05-2007. Singapore: Management University.

Alfredo Cartone, Paolo Postiglione, Modelli spaziali di regressione quantilica per l’analisi della convergenza economica regionale in "RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO" 3/2016, pp 28-48, DOI: 10.3280/REST2016-003003