How Not To Respond To A Provocation
Journal title ITALIA CONTEMPORANEA
Author/s Valentina Pisanty
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/284 Language Italian
Pages 6 P. 95-100 File size 80 KB
DOI 10.3280/IC2017-284004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The history of Holocaust denial is that of a contagious idea in search of an environment in which to thrive. Already conceived by the perpetrators at the time of the mass killings, after the war this anti-historic thesis developed new survival strategies within a hostile culture that had recognised the Shoah as its founding event. What strategies? From the "Faurisson affair" to the explosion of Internet hate speech, the evolutionary success of the "paper Eichmanns" is linked to their ability to intercept and rearrange elements that are alien to their ideological matrix: first and foremost the principle of freedom of expression. That is why, far from neutralizing the phenomenon, the criminalization of Holocaust denial is bound to amplify its rhetorical effects.
Keywords: Holocaust Denial, Censorship, Freedom of Expression, Semiotics
Valentina Pisanty, Punire o non punire: per una discussione sulla legislazione antinegazionista. Come non rispondere a una provocazione in "ITALIA CONTEMPORANEA" 284/2017, pp 95-100, DOI: 10.3280/IC2017-284004