Videos in Teachers’ Initial, Continuous and Life-long Training: Five Significant Experiences Towards a New Formative Model

Journal title EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Author/s Paola Cortiana
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/1 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 55-70 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa1-2022oa13936
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Many international and national teacher training courses include the use of video, which is a privileged tool to catch the processes that take place in the classroom: in the last fifteen years there has been an intensification of these experiences in different fields and geographical areas. In the light of the theoretical framework of the professional vision, the articles review focuses on five international and national experiences of teacher training, which in the diversity of epistemological setting and posture, concur to outline an initial, ongoing and continuing training course that makes use of the video tool in online mode. The survey, which does not claim to be exhaustive, wants to start an analysis on a possible training model that pays attention to the training referent and the observational criteria adopted. The studio is part of the 2019-2020 project of excellence “Quality teaching and teaching practices. Feasibility study for the development of a device for the study of teacher training practices” of the Department of Philosophy and Educational Sciences of the University of Turin.

Keywords: ; Video-research; video-observation; teacher development; professional vision; online training

  1. Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2018). Leveraging analysis of students’ disciplinary thinking in a video club to promote student-centered science instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 18.1, 50-80.
  2. Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Gamoran Sherin, M., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for educational research online 5.1, 90-11.
  3. Bonaiuti, G. (2012). La video annotazione per osservare e riflettere. Form@re-Open Journal per La Formazione in Rete, 12.79, 71-83.
  4. Bonaiuti, G., Santagata, R., & Vivanet, G. (2020). Using video to examine teacher noticing and the role of teaching experience. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 28.2, 152-167. DOI: 10.17471/2499-4324/1163.
  5. Brophy, J. (Ed.) (2004). Using video in teacher education. Elsevier, Inc.
  6. Calvani, A., Bonaiuti, G., Andreocci, B. (2011). Il microteaching rinascerà a nuova vita? Video annotazione e sviluppo della riflessività del docente. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, IV.6.
  7. Camizzi, l. & Perrone, F. (2017). L’innovazione della didattica dell’italiano: dai con-tenuti per la formazione dei docenti alle pratiche in classe. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, X, 343-365.
  8. Colella, D., Vasciarelli, E., (2020). La formazione degli insegnanti attraverso la video-analisi. Attualità e prospettive. MeTis. Mondi Educativi. Temi, Indagini, Suggestioni, 10.1, 18-34.
  9. Dalehefte, I.M. Rieck, K. (2014). How do German primary school teachers prepare students for science standards? Findings from a video study of the Professional Development Program SINUS for Primary Schools. Form@re, Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 14.2, 7-20.
  10. De Cani, L. (2020). Videoricerca e pratiche riflessive nella formazione dei docenti. Scholé - Editrice Morcelliana.
  11. Felisatti, E., & Tonegato, P. (2012). Il laboratorio di Microteaching nel Tirocinio On-Line per la formazione iniziale degli insegnanti. Form@re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 12.79, 64-70.
  12. Ferrari, S., Carlomagno, N., Di Tore, P.A., Di Tore, S. & Rivoltella, P.C. (2013). How technologies in the classroom are modifying space and time management in teachers’ experience? Research on Education and Media, V.2.
  13. Ferretti, F., Vannini, I., Ciani, A. & Bolondi, G. (2018). Analisi dei bisogni formativi degli insegnanti nel campo della valutazione. Triangolazione di dati sulle convinzioni e le pratiche dei docenti di matematica e le percezioni dei loro studenti. In P. Lucisano & A.M. Notti (Eds.). Training actions and evaluation processes. Atti del Convegno Internazionale SIRD (pp. 345-361). Pensamultimedia.
  14. Fischer, H. E. & Neumann, K. (2012). Video analysis as a tool for understanding science instruction. In D. Jorde & J. Dillan (Eds.) The world of science education (pp. 1-37). Sense Publishers.
  15. Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41-67.
  16. Gaudin, C., Flandin, S., Luc Ria, L, & Chaliès, S. (2014). An exploratory study of the influence of video viewing on preservice teachers’ teaching activity: normative versus developmental approaches. Form@re, Open Journal per la formazione in rete. 14.2, 21-50.
  17. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B. & Derry, S.J. (2009). Videoricerca nei contesti di apprendimento. Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  18. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96.3, 606-63.
  19. Gröschner, Seidel, Kiemer, & Pehmer (2014). Through the lens of teacher professional development components: The “dialogic video cycle” as an innovative program to foster classroom dialogue. Professional Development in Education, 22-28.
  20. Hamel, C., Viau-Guay, A., Ria, L., & Dion-Routhier, J. (2018). Video-enhanced training to support professional development in elementary science teaching: A begin-ning teacher’s experience. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Edu-cation, 18.1, 102-124.
  21. Kane, T. J., Gehlbach, H., Greenberg, M., Quinn, D., & Thal, D. (2015). The best foot forward project: substituting teacher-collected video for in-person classroom observations. Center for Education Policy Research, Harvard University Press.
  22. Lussi Borer, V, Luc Ria, Marc Durand, M., & Muller, A. (2014). How do teachers appropriate learning objects through critical experiences? A study of a pilot in-school collaborative video learning lab. Form@re, Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 14.2, 63-74.
  23. Maccario, D., & Cortiana, P. (2021). Video come strumento di accesso alle pratiche didattiche. Tra studio dell’azione di insegnamento e formazione dei docenti. Nuova Secondaria, 81-101.
  24. Major, L. & Watson, S. (2017). Using video to support in-service teacher professional development: the state of the field, limitations and possibilities. Technology, Pe-dagogy & Education, 27.1, 49-68.
  25. Mangione, G. R., & Rosa, A. (2017). Professional vision e il peer to peer nel percorso Neoassunti. L’uso del video per l’analisi della pratica del docente in classe. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 17.1, 120-143.
  26. Marsh, B., & Mitchell, N. (2014). The role of video in teacher professional development. Teacher Development, 18.3, 403-417.
  27. Panciroli, C., Corazza, C., & Reggiani, A. (2017). Il documentario di osservazione per la formazione delle professionalità educative. Form@re-Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 17.1, 82-98.
  28. Perini, M., Cattaneo, A, & Tacconi, G. (2019). Using hypervideo to support under-graduate students’ reflection on work practices: a qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 1, 1-16.
  29. Petrucco, C. (2015). Partecipazione e condivisione di conoscenza negli apprendimenti on-line. Formazione & Insegnamento, XIII.3, 43-72.
  30. Praetorius, A.K., Pauli, C, Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2014). One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons. Learning and Instruction, 31, 2-12.
  31. Rossi P.G., Fedeli L., Biondi S., Magnoler P., Bramucci A., & Lancioni C. (2015). The use of video recorded classes to develop teacher professionalism: the experimentation of a curriculum. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11.2, 111-127.
  32. Rossi, P.G., Magnoler, P., Giannandrea, L., Mangione, G.R., Pettenati, M.C., & Rosa, A. (2015). Il teacher portfolio per la formazione dei neo-assunti. Pedagogia oggi, 2, 223-242.
  33. Santagata, R. e Guarino, J. (2011), Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM. The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43.1, 133-145.
  34. Sauli, F., Cattaneo, A., & van der Meij, H. (2018). Hypervideo for educational pur-poses: A literature review on a multifaceted technological tool. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27.1, 115-134.
  35. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
  36. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27.2, 259-267.
  37. Seidel, T. & Strumer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, X, 1-32.
  38. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences, pp. 383-395. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  39. Van E S., E. A. (2012). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28.2, 182-192.
  40. van Es, E. S., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T. & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop preservice teachers’ vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35.3, 165-187.
  41. Varela, F. T., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MiT Press.

Paola Cortiana, Il Video nella Formazione Iniziale, Continua e Permanente dei Docenti: cinque Esperienze Significative per Immaginare un Nuovo Modello Formativo in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2022, pp 55-70, DOI: 10.3280/exioa1-2022oa13936