The Promise of Social Justice through Digitalization in Education

Journal title EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Author/s Pia Rojahn
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/1 Special Issue
Language English Pages 12 P. 70-81 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/erpoa1SI-2025oa19371
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

<p>Different global institutions like the UN and the UNESCO make claims on a positive potential that the digitalization could have in achieving more social justice, particularly through education. This belief in the positive effects of digitalization in education will be challenged in this paper by addressing three concerns that are particularly connected with the experience of collectivity: 1) Social media is confused with a public space. 2) The isolating experience in using digital tools stands in contrast to the collectiveness of educational settings. 3) Educational responsibility is lost when digital tools are in charge of education.<br />These concerns will be discussed with reference to Hannah Arendt’s differentiation of disparate life spheres (the private, the political and the social), her analysis of the experience of being alone (solitude, isolation and loneliness) and her critique concerning the devaluation of the teacher’s profession. Finally, the analysis will be connected to a post-critical perspective in education that emphasizes the experience of collectivity in educational settings.</p>

Keywords: Digitalization;Hannah Arendt;isolation;collectivity;educational responsibility;post-critical pedagogy

  1. Arendt, H. (2017). The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: Penguin.
  2. Arendt, H. (1961). The Crisis in Education. In: Arendt H. (ed.). Between Past and Future. Six Exercises in Political Thought (pp. 173-197). New York: The Viking Press.
  3. Arendt, H. (1959). Reflections on Little Rock. Dissent, Winter, pp. 46-56.
  4. Arendt, H. (1992). Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226231785.001.0001
  5. Ausat, A. M. A., Massang, B., Efendi, M., Nofirman, N. & Riady, Y. (2023). Can ChatGPT Replace the Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A Fundamental Analysis. Journal on Education, 5(4), pp. 16100-16106. -- <a href="https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/2745">https://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/2745</a>.
  6. Berkowitz, R. (2020). Reflections on Hannah Arendt’s “Reflections on Little Rock”. HA. The Journal of the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities 8, pp. 73-80.
  7. Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J. & Zamojski, P. (2017). Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy. Earth: punctum books.
  8. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  9. Knowledge for Development without Borders (n.y.). Digitalisation for Development. Our Digitalization Platform for Social Justice. --
  10. <a href="https://www.knowledgefordevelopmentwithoutborders.org/digitalization-forsocial-justice/">https://www.knowledgefordevelopmentwithoutborders.org/digitalization-forsocial-justice/</a> [03.12.24].
  11. Masschelein, J. & Simons, M. (2013). In Defense of the School. A Public Issue. Leuven: E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers.
  12. Rojahn, P. (2024). Natality at Risk? Raising Doubts on the Educational Importance of ChatGPT. Colloquium, 1(53), pp. 195-207. DOI: 10.34813/13coll2024
  13. United Nations (2006). Social Justice in an Open World. The Role of the United Nations. -- <a href="https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/ifsd/SocialJustice.pdf">https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/ifsd/SocialJustice.pdf</a> [03.12.24].
  14. United Nations (2023). World Day of Social Justice: Overcoming Barriers and Unleashing Opportunities for Social Justice. -- <a href="https://www.un.org/en/observances/social-justiceday">https://www.un.org/en/observances/social-justiceday</a> [03.12.24].
  15. UNESCO (2016). Unpacking Sustainable Development Goal 4. Education 2030. -- <a href="https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246300">https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246300</a> [03.12.24].
  16. WACC (2021). Communication for Social Justice in a Digital Age. Manifesto. -- <a href="https://waccglobal.org/resources/digital-justice/communication-for-socialjustice-in-a-digital-age/">https://waccglobal.org/resources/digital-justice/communication-for-socialjustice-in-a-digital-age/</a> [03.12.24].
  17. Vlieghe, J. & Zamojski, P. (2019). Towards an Ontology of Teaching. Thing-centred Pedagogy, Affirmation and Love for the World. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16003-6

Pia Rojahn, The Promise of Social Justice through Digitalization in Education in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 1 Special Issue/2025, pp 70-81, DOI: 10.3280/erpoa1SI-2025oa19371