Normativity or the Genesis of Values: On Critique/Post-critique and Educational Pragmatism

Journal title EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Author/s Stefano Oliverio, Matteo Santarelli
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/1 Special Issue
Language Italian Pages 17 P. 82-98 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/erpoa1SI-2025oa19360
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In this paper, we will explore a possible dialogue between educational pragmatism and post-critical pedagogy (PCP) and we will ‘test’ it in reference to the question of inclusion, which is arguably one of the chief notions in contemporary educational debate. To start with, we will object to the possibly unfortunate adoption of the “normativity” vocabulary within the Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy and we will suggest the need for a shift from the language of norms to that of values, by building on Hans Joas’ distinction between norms and values. While norms have to do with obligation and the limitation of possibilities of action, values are characterized by an ideal and inspirational function. In keeping with Joas’ distinction, we will argue that the notion of normativity may risk being accomplice with the excessive role of normative critique decried by postcritical approaches.
Against this backdrop, we will zoom in on the question of inclusion. We will indicate two possible outlooks: a critical pragmatist view of inclusion, as exemplified in some insights of José Medina, and a post-critical understanding, which we will outline in reference to Joas but also - via him - to the classics of educational pragmatism. We will finally suggest that the relationships between critique and post-critique should be construed in terms of a quasi-Bohrian complementarity and that pragmatism qua a “corridor theory,” as Papini famously put it, can help us to orchestrate this complex regime of relationships.

Keywords: Post-critical pedagogy;values;norms;educational pragmatism

  1. Addams, J. (2002). Democracy and Social Ethics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  2. Arendt, H. (2006). Crisis in education. In H. Arendt, Between Past and Future. London: Penguin books.
  3. Benner, D. (2015). Allgemeine Pädagogik. Eine systematischproblemgeschichtliche Einführung in die Grundstruktur pädagogischen Denkens und Handelns. Weinheim und München: BELTZ Juventa.
  4. Cremin, L.A. (1961). The Transformation of the School. Progressivism in American Education 1876-1957. New York: Vintage Books.
  5. Dewey, J. (1984). The Sources of a Science of Education. In J.A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey: vol. 5: 1929-1930 (pp. 1-40). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  6. Dewey, J. (1986). A Common Faith. In J.A. Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey: vol. 9: 1933-1934 (pp. 1-58). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  7. Fendler, L. (2018). Educationalization. In P. Smeyers (ed.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education (pp. 1169-1184). Cham: Springer.
  8. Heinich, N. (2017). Des valeurs. Un approche sociologique. Paris: Gallimard.
  9. Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2017). Manifesto for a post-critical pedagogy. Santa Barbara (CA): punctum books.
  10. James, W. (1982) The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Penguin Classics.
  11. Joas, H. (2000). The Genesis of Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Joas, H. (2008). The Cultural Values of Europe: An Introduction. In H. Joas & K. Wiegandt (eds.), The Cultural Values of Europe (pp. 1-21). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  13. Labaree, D.F. (2008). The Winning Ways of a Losing Strategy: Educationalizing Social Problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), pp. 447-460. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00299.x
  14. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In Defense of the School. A Public Issue. Leuven: Education, Culture & Society Publishers.
  15. Medina, J. (2014). Towards An Ethics and Pedagogy of Discomfort: Insensitivity, Perplexity, and Education as Inclusion. Civitas Educationis. Education, Politics and Culture, 3(1), pp. 51-67.
  16. Oliverio, S. (2018). The Philosophical and Educational Big Bang. An Aristophanic-Deweyan Archaeology. In N. Levinson (ed.), Philosophy of Education Society Yearbook 2016 (pp. 362-371). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
  17. Oliverio, S. (2019). An Edifying Philosophy of Education? Starting a Conversation between Rorty and Post-critical Pedagogy. Ethics & Education, 14(4), pp. 482-496. DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1669311
  18. Oliverio, S. (2020). The Question of a Thing-Centred View of Education: Notes on Vlieghe and Zamojski’s Towards an Ontology of Teaching. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(1), pp. 103-107. DOI: 10.1007/s11217-019-09693-w
  19. Oliverio, S., & Thoilliez, B. (2024). Post-Critical Pedagogy: A Philosophical and Epistemological Identikit. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 58(6), pp. 1029-1045. DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhae076
  20. Papini, G. (1961). Pragmatismo. In G. Papini, Filosofia e letteratura (pp. 329-468). Milano: Arnaldo Mondadori Editore.
  21. Santarelli, M. (2024). Improving Concepts, Reshaping Values: Pragmatism and Ameliorative Projects. Inquiry, 67(3), pp. 872-890.
  22. 1080/0020174X.2022.2095300.
  23. Seigfried, C.H. (2002). Introduction. In J. Addams, Democracy and Social Ethics (pp. ix-xxxviii). Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  24. Serrano Zamora, J., & Santarelli, M. (2021). Populism or Pragmatism? Two Ways of Understanding Political Articulation. Constellations, 28(4), pp. 496-510. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12522
  25. Smeyers, P, & Depaepe, M. (eds.) (2008). Educational Research: The Educationalization of Social Problems. Cham: Springer.
  26. Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophical Papers, vol. 1: Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Thoilliez, B. (2019). Hope and Education beyond Critique. Towards Pedagogy with a Lower Case ‘p’. Ethics & Education, 14(4), pp. 453-466. DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1669379
  28. Viola, T. (2019). From Vague Symbols to Contested Concepts: Peirce, W.B. Gallie, and History. History and Theory, 58(2), pp. 233-251. DOI: 10.1111/hith.12111
  29. Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2019). Towards an Ontology of Teaching: Thingcentred Pedagogy, Affirmation and Love for the World. Cham: Springer.
  30. Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2020). Redefining Education and Politics: On the Paradoxical Relation between Two Separate Spheres. Policy Futures in Education, 18(7), pp. 864-877. DOI: 10.1177/1478210320943808
  31. Wortmann, K. (2019). ‘Post-critical Pedagogy as Poetic Practice: Combining Affirmative and Critical Vocabularies’. Ethics and Education, 14(4), pp. 467-81. DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1669942

Stefano Oliverio, Matteo Santarelli, Normativity or the Genesis of Values: On Critique/Post-critique and Educational Pragmatism in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 1 Special Issue/2025, pp 82-98, DOI: 10.3280/erpoa1SI-2025oa19360