Earnings management incentives: Are they the same for all private firms?

Journal title FINANCIAL REPORTING
Author/s Thomas Niederkofler, Lucie Courteau
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/2
Language English Pages 41 P. 123-163 File size 308 KB
DOI 10.3280/fr202519868
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Purpose: This paper examines financial reporting incentives and behaviour among various private firm groups. The findings of prior research are mixed as to whether the managers of private firms make reporting choices that enhance earnings quality or just to minimize their tax burden. This study contributes a nuanced analysis of private firms’ characteristics, motives, and accounting choices among the European Commission’s recommended private firm classifications. Methodology: While most prior studies in this area consider private firms a homo-geneous group, we divide our sample of 76,588 Italian private firms into four (and two) size categories and compare reporting incentives and behaviour, as documented by existing literature, between these groups. Findings: We find strong evidence of differences in reporting behaviour between firms of different groups. Contrary to expectations, tax minimization does not seem to be the dominating incentive, even for smaller private firms and loss avoidance is prevalent in all groups. We find some evidence that larger firms try to build a reputation to respond to the demand for reporting quality from short-term creditors and minority shareholders but the pressure from long-term debt providers seems to mo-tivate managers to engage in opportunistic earnings management. We also find that smaller firms exhibit a more opportunistic reporting behaviour, although stakeholder pressures seem to affect them to a lower degree. Originality/value: These findings suggest that the diversity of private firms’ char-acteristics and incentives should be taken into consideration in future research on private firms. In other words, earnings management incentives differ notably be-tween private firms.

Keywords: earnings management, earnings quality, private firms, stakeholder de-mands, Italy

Jel codes: C1, K2, M4

  1. Atwood, T., Drake, M., Myers, J., & Myers, L. (2012). Home Country Tax System Characteristics and Corporate Tax Avoidance: International Evidence. The Ac-counting Review, 87(6), 1831-1860.
  2. Ball, R., & and Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: com-parative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.
  3. Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2006). The Role of Accruals in Asymmetrically Timely Gain and Loss Recognition. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(2), 207-242.
  4. Ball, R., Kothari, S., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Eco-nomics, 29(1), 1-51. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00007-6
  5. Beatty, A., & Harris, D. (1999). The effects of taxes, agency costs and information asymmetry on earnings management: A comparison of public and private firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 4(3), 299-326. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009642403312
  6. Beatty, A., Ke, B., & Petroni, K. (2002). Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 547-570.
  7. Bernard, D., Burgstahler, D., & Kaya, D. (2018). Size management by European private firms to minimize proprietary costs of disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 66(1), 94-122.
  8. Berzins, J., Øyvind, B., & PåL, R. (2008). Corporate Finance and Governance in Firms with limited liability: Basic characteristics. Research Report No. 1, Centre for Corporate Governance Research, Norwegian Business School.
  9. Beuselinck, C., Elfers, F., Gassen, J., & Pierk, J. (2023). Private firm accounting: the European reporting environment, data and research perspectives. Accounting and Business Research. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2021.1982670
  10. Bigus, J., & Hillebrand, C. (2017). Bank Relationships and Private Firms’ Financial Reporting Quality. European Accounting Review, 26(2), 379-409, DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2016.1152906
  11. Bigus, J., Georgiou, N., & Schorn, P. (2016). Legal Form and Earnings Properties. European Accounting Review, 25(3), 515-548. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2015.1051566
  12. Blaylock, B., Gaertner, F., & Shevlin, T. (2015). Book-Tax Conformity and Capital Structure. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(1), 141-172.
  13. Bonacchi, M., Marra, A., & Zarowin, P. (2019). Organizational structure and earn-ings quality of private and public firms. Review of Accounting Studies. 24.
  14. Bonacchi, M., Cipollini, F., & Zarowin, P. (2018). Parents’ use of subsidiaries to “push down” earnings management: Evidence from Italy. Contemporary Ac-counting Research, 35(3), 1332-1362. DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.1233
  15. Bowen, R., DuCharme, L., & Shores D. (1995). Stakeholders’ implicit claims and accounting method choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 255-295.
  16. Breuer, M. (2021). How does financial-reporting regulation affect industry-wide re-source allocation?. Journal of Accounting Research, 59(1), 59-110.
  17. Burgstahler, D., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The Importance of Reporting Incen-tives: EM in European Private and Public Firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 983-1016.
  18. Chen, W. E. I., Hribar, P., & Melessa, S. (2018). Incorrect inferences when using residuals as dependent variables. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(3), 751-796. DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12195
  19. CNA Interpreta (2011). Study on Accounting Requirements for SMEs: Final Report. European Commission, Brussels.
  20. Cole, R., & Wolken, J. (1995). Financial Services Used by Small Businesses: Evi-dence from the 1993 National Survey of Small Business Finances. Federal Re-serve Bulletin, 81(7), 629-667.
  21. Coppens, L., & Peek, E. (2005). An analysis of EM by European private firms. Jour-nal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 14, 1-17.
  22. Dechow, P., Richardson, S., & Tuna, I. (2003). Why are earnings kinky? An exam-ination of the earnings management explanation. Review of Accounting Studies, 8(2-3), 355-384. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024481916719
  23. Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.
  24. Dedman, E., Kausar, A., & Lennox, C. (2013). The Demand for Audit in Private Firms: Recent Large-Sample Evidence from the UK. European Accounting Re-view, 23(1), 1-23. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2013.776298
  25. European Union Commission (2003). Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Com-mission Recommendation 2003/361/EC.
  26. European Union Commission (2020). User guide to the SME Definition Luxem-bourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  27. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  28. Gassen, J., Fülbier, R., & Sellhorn, T. (2006). International Differences in Condi-tional Conservatism – The Role of Unconditional Conservatism and Income Smoothing. European Accounting Review, 15, 527-564.
  29. Gassen, J., & Fülbier, R. (2015). Do Creditors Prefer Smooth Earnings? Evidence from European Private Firms. Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(2), 151-180.
  30. Gilliam, T., Heflin, F., & Paterson, J. (2015). Evidence that the zero-earnings dis-continuity has disappeared. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60, 117-132.
  31. Giunta, F. (2014). Detecting Earnings Manipulations: Time think about european SMEs. A call for a Joint International Research Project. Financial Reporting, 2-3-4, 5-15. DOI: 10.3280/FR2014-002001
  32. Givoly, D., Hayn, C., & Katz, S. (2010). Does public ownership of equity improve earnings quality?. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 195-225.
  33. Gunny, K. (2010). The Relation Between Earnings Management Using Real Activ-ities Manipulation and Future Performance: Evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27, 855-888.
  34. Haapamäki, E. (2018). Voluntary Auditing: A Synthesis of the Literature. Account-ing in Europe, 15(1), 81-104. DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1430369
  35. Healy, P., & Wahlen, J. (1999). A Review of the EM Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383.
  36. Herrmann, D., & Inoue, T. (1996). Income smoothing and incentives by operating condition: An empirical test using depreciation changes in Japan. Journal of In-ternational Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 5(2), 161-177. DOI: 10.1016/S1061-9518(96)90003-8
  37. Hope, O., Thomas, W., & Vyas, D. (2017). Stakeholder demand for accounting qual-ity and economic usefulness of accounting in U.S. private firms. Journal of Ac-counting Public Policy, 36, 1-13.
  38. Hope, O., & Vyas, D. (2017). Private company finance and financial reporting. Ac-counting and Business Research, 47(5), 506-537. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2017.1303963
  39. Jones, E. (2012). Italy’s sovereign debt crisis. Survival, 54(1), 83-110. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2012.657545
  40. Jones, J. (1991). Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Jour-nal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228. DOI: 10.2307/2491047
  41. Lisowsky, P., & Minnis, M. (2020). The Silent majority: Private US firms and fi-nancial reporting choices. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(3), 547-588. DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12306
  42. Liu, S., & Skerratt, L. (2018). Earnings quality across different reporting regimes: Listed, large private, medium-sized, small and micro companies in the UK. Jour-nal of Applied Accounting Research, 19, 2-19. DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-02-2015-0009
  43. MacLeod, B. (2007). Reputations, relationships, and contract enforcement. Journal of economic literature, 45(3), 595-628.
  44. Markarian, G., Pozza, L., & Prencipe, A. (2008). Capitalization of R&D costs and earnings management: Evidence from Italian listed companies. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 246-267.
  45. Nobili, V., & Mafrolla, E. (2017). Discretionary accruals in Italian private firms and non-linear bank loan granting. Financial reporting, 1, 83-99.
  46. Peek, E., Cuijpers, R., & Buijink, W. (2010). Creditors’ and Shareholders’ Reporting Demands in Public Versus Private Firms: Evidence from Europe. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(1), 49-91.
  47. Prencipe, A., Markarian, G., & Pozza, L. (2008). Earnings management in family firms: Evidence from R&D cost capitalization in Italy. Family Business Review, 21(1), 71-88.
  48. Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipula-tion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335-370. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29089.97129
  49. Silverman, B. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Ohio: CRC Press. DOI: 10.1201/9781315140919
  50. Tang, T. (2015). Does Book-Tax Conformity Deter Opportunistic Book and Tax Reporting? An International Analysis. European Accounting Review, 24(3), 441-469. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2014.932297
  51. Tucker, J., & Zarowin, P. (2006). Does Income Smoothing Improves Earnings In-formativeness? The Accounting Review, 81(1), 251-270.
  52. Vanstraelen, A., & Schelleman, C. (2017). Auditing private companies: what do we know? Accounting and Business Research, 47(5), 565-584. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2017.1314104
  53. Vera, D., & Onji, K. (2010). Changes in the banking system and small business lending. Small Business Economics, 34(3), 293-308.
  54. Vorst, P. (2016). Real Earnings Management and Long-Term Operating Perfor-mance: The Role of Reversals in Discretionary Investment Cuts. Accounting Re-view, 91(4), 1219-1256.

Thomas Niederkofler, Lucie Courteau, Earnings management incentives: Are they the same for all private firms? in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 2/2025, pp 123-163, DOI: 10.3280/fr202519868