Relational Erotic Capital and Board Dynamics in the Context of Team Production and Value Creating Boards

Journal title CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Author/s Morten Huse
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2025/2
Language English Pages 26 P. 91-116 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds2-2025oa21276
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

<p>What is erotic capital, and how is it influencing board dynamics? How can we develop research and knowledge about board dynamics and board members’ erotic capital? Is erotic capital an enabler cross-cutting other capitals, or is it an independent board capital? In this reflection paper I try to identify how erotic capital can influence board dynamics, team production and corporate value creation.</p> <p>The theoretical background and starting point in this paper is the extended team production theory (Gabrielsson and Huse, 2023) and Hakim’s publications on erotic capital (2010, 2011a). Board dynamics is about power and the human side of corporate governance, and erotic capital has hardly been used in the board literature. I argue that erotic capital today may be an important concept for exploring board dynamics and power. Two types of erotic capital are identified. Relational erotic capital is about attraction, while social erotic capital is about attractiveness. Relational erotic capital may have significant impact on board dynamic, for example by energizing the board as a team, creating cohesion and developing a boardroom culture. Social erotic capital is directly linked to distant stakeholders and contributes legitimacy and reputation.</p> <p>The paper thus concludes that erotic capital can moderate relations between other types of capital and board task performance as well as being an independent part of other capitals. Erotic capital has been seen as a taboo topic in board research and discussions. It has also been argued that it is impossible to do research on erotic capital. I disagree with this, and thus I outline research paths that can help us understand board dynamics as a result of erotic capital.</p>

Keywords: Autoethnography;Board Capitals;Extended Team Production Theory;Value Chain Approach;Erotic capital

  1. Green A.I. (2008b). The social organization of desire: The sexual fields approach. Sociological Theory, 26(1): 25-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008. 00317.x
  2. Ahmed S., Ranta M., Vähämaa E., Vähämaa S. (2023). Facial attractiveness and CEO compensation: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Economics and Business, 123: 106095. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jeconbus.2022.106095
  3. Alchian A.A., Demsetz H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5): 777-795, <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/1815199">https://www.jstor.org/stable/1815199</a>.
  4. Alvesson M., Gabriel Y., Paulsen R. (2017). Return to Meaning: A Social Science with something to Say. Oxford University Press.
  5. Becker G.S. (1994). Human capital revisited. In Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, third edi-tion (pp. 15-28). The University of Chicago Press.
  6. Bell E., Sinclair A. (2014). Reclaiming eroticism in the academy. Organization, 21(2): 268-280. DOI: 10.1177/1350508413493084
  7. Beulaygue I.C. (2012). Flirting With Erotic Capital: Erotic Capital and Labor Market Earnings Among Women (Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami).
  8. Blair M.M., Stout, L.A. (1999). A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review, 85(2): 247-328. Available at: <a href="https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/26">https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications/26</a>.
  9. Bourdieu P (1986). “The Forms of Capital”. In Cultural Theory: An Anthology, edited by I. Szeman and T. Kaposy, 81-93. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  10. De Beauvoir S. (1976). The second sex 25 years later. Society, 13(2): 79-85.
  11. Dong Y., Duan T., Hou W., Liu Y.L. (2019). Athletes in boardrooms: Evidence from the world. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59: 165-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2018.12.009
  12. Ees H. v., Gabrielsson J., Huse M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3): 307-319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x
  13. Ellis C. (1991). Sociological introspection and emotional experience. Symbolic Interaction, 14(1): 23-50. DOI: 10.1525/si.1991.14.1.23
  14. Ellis C., Adams T.E., Bochner A.P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung, 12(1): Art 10, January, <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294">https://www.jstor.org/stable/23032294</a>.
  15. Fama E.F., Jensen M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): 301-325. DOI: 10.1086/467037
  16. Forbes D.P., Milliken F.J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 489-505. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1999.2202133
  17. Gabrielsson J., Huse M. (2023). Sustainability ethics and team production: implications for value-creating boards in SMEs. In Research Handbook on Corporate Governance and Ethics (pp. 48-67). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  18. Geiler P., Renneboog L., Zhao Y. (2018). Beauty and appearance in corporate director elections. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 55: 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2018.03.004
  19. Green A.I. (2008a). Erotic habitus: Toward a sociology of desire. Theory and Society, 37(6): 597-626. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-007-9059-4
  20. Green A.I. (2013). ‘Erotic capital’ and the power of desirability: Why ‘honey money’ is a bad collective strategy for remedying gender inequality. Sexualities, 16(1-2): 137-158. DOI: 10.1177/1363460712471109
  21. Hakim C. (1987). Research design: Strategies and choices in the design of social research (No. 13). George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  22. Hakim C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  23. Hakim C. (2006). Women, careers, and work-life preferences. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34(3): 279-294. DOI: 10.1080/03069880600769118
  24. Hakim C. (2010). Erotic capital. European Sociological Review, 26(5): 499-518. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcq014
  25. Hakim C. (2011a). Erotic Capital: The power of Attraction in the Boardroom and the Bedroom. Basic books.
  26. Hakim C. (2011b). Honey Money: The Power of Erotic Capital. Penguin UK.
  27. Hakim C. (2012). Research design: Successful designs for social economics research. Routledge.
  28. Hakim C. (2013). Beauty, intelligence and height: The black holes of sociology. Sociologica, 7(2): 36-40. DOI: 10.2383/74857
  29. Hakim C. (2015). The Male Sexual Deficit: A Social Fact of the Twenty-First Cen-tury. International Sociology 30(3): 314-335. DOI: 10.1177/0268580915569090
  30. Hakim C. (2016). The sugar in his tea: Sexuality, patriarchy and sexual politics. Sociologica, 10(3): 1-27. DOI: 10.2383/85805
  31. Haynes K.T., Hillman A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11): 1145-1163. DOI: 10.1002/smj.859
  32. Hillman A.J., Dalziel T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 383-396. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
  33. Huse M. (1994). Board-management relations in small firms: The paradox of simultaneous independence and interdependence. Small Business Economics, 6(1): 55-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF01066112
  34. Huse M. (1998). Researching the dynamics of board-stakeholder relations. Long Range Planning, 31(2): 218-226. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00006-5
  35. Huse M. (2007). Boards, Governance and Value Creation: The Human Side of Corporate Governance. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Huse M. (2008a). The Value Creating Board. Routledge.
  37. Huse M. (2008b). Exploring methods and concepts in studies of board processes. In Huse (ed.) The Value Creating Board (pp. 221-223), Routledge.
  38. Huse M. (2018). Value-creating Boards: Challenges for Future Practice and Research. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Huse M. (2023). Board Processes and Performance: The Impact of Directors’ Social and Human Capital. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
  40. Huse M., De Silva M. (2023). Polymorphic research and boards of directors: Let us make a better world together. In Cucari, DeFalco, Lee & Yamak, Handbook of Research Methods for Corporate Governance: Innovative Methods for Future Research. E. Elgar Publishing.
  41. Huse M., Hoskisson R., Zattoni A., Viganò R. (2011). New perspectives on board research: Changing the research agenda. Journal of Management & Governance, 15(1): 5-28. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-009-9122-9
  42. Huse M., Solberg A.G. (2006). Gender‐related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2): 113-130. DOI: 10.1108/09649420610650693
  43. Mansoor A., Saher N. (2024). Women repressed? We think not! The intimacy between erotic capital and career ascent in Pakistani academia. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/13603124.2024.2431978
  44. Montemurro B. (2014). Getting married, breaking up, and making up for lost time: Relationship transitions as turning points in women’s sexuality. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(1): 64-93. DOI: 10.1177/0891241613494808
  45. Montemurro B., Hughes E. (2025). Erotic capital and erotic dividends. Sexualities, 28(3): 1139-1153. DOI: 10.1177/13634607241239111
  46. Pettigrew A.M. (1997). What is a processual analysis?. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4): 337-348.
  47. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
  48. Putnam R.D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13(4): March 21.
  49. Requena F. (2017). Erotic capital and subjective well-being. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 50: 13-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2017.04.001
  50. Rigolini A., Huse M. (2021). Women and Multiple Board Memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(3): 443-459. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04313-6
  51. Sarpila O. (2014). Attitudes towards performing and developing erotic capital in consumer culture. European Sociological Review, 30(3): 302-314. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jct037
  52. Stern I., Westphal J.D. (2010). Stealthy footsteps to the boardroom: Executives’ backgrounds, sophisticated interpersonal influence behavior, and board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2): 278-319. DOI: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.278
  53. Webster Jr M., Driskell Jr J.E. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1): 140-165. DOI: 10.1086/227836
  54. Westphal J.D., Stern I. (2006). The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2): 169-204. DOI: 10.2189/asqu.51.2.169
  55. Wojtaszczyk K., Syper-Jędrzejak M. (2025). Erotic capital: The role of attractiveness in employment and private Life. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 54: 1875-1893. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-025-03134-1
  56. Zahra S.A., Pearce J.A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2): 291-334. DOI: 10.1177/014920638901500208
  57. Zetterberg H.L. (1966). The secret ranking. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 134-142.

Morten Huse, Relational Erotic Capital and Board Dynamics in the Context of Team Production and Value Creating Boards in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 2/2025, pp 91-116, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds2-2025oa21276