Journal title PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE
Author/s Morris N. Eagle
Publishing Year 1 Issue 2000/2 Language Italian
Pages 18 P. File size 860 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Una valutazione critica delle attuali concettualizzazioni su transfert e controtransfert ABSTRACT: The author's main thesis is that, quite ironically, in reacting against the classical blank screen view of the analytic situation, a new and more subtle version of the blank 'screen analyst, or at least of the blank mirror analyst, has emerged. In this new version, the analyst's countertransference reactions tend to be seen as a virtually unerring guide to the patient's mental contents. Some difficulties with this new point of view are discussed, and a criticaI discussion of Racker' s concept of complementary identification and the much used concept of projective identification is included.
Morris N. Eagle, Una valutazione critica delle attuali concettualizzazioni su transfert e controtransfert in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 2/2000, pp , DOI: