La protezione del diritto di sciopero nella dialettica tra corti e organi di supervisione internazionali

Journal title GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI
Author/s Valerio De Stefano
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/143 Language Italian
Pages 34 P. 461-494 File size 192 KB
DOI 10.3280/GDL2014-143002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

According to the relevant supervisory bodies, the principles set out in the Laval Quartet may infringe the European Social Charter’s and ILO’s standards on the right to collective bargaining and collective action. The Author analyses these supervisory bodies’ decisions and the potential clash between the Laval line of cases and the recent case law of the ECtHR: in particular, the proportionality tests adopted by the two courts may be at odds, this possibly leading to a breach of the ECHR standards. The Author also refers to the current dispute at the ILO concerning the international protection of the right to strike. In the Author’s view, this dispute does not undermine the reasonableness of the current ECtHR’s trend towards protecting social and labour rights under the Convention, as this trend is grounded in the need to protect human dignity at work and since freedom of association and its corollaries are still fundamental in this respect.

Keywords: Supranational protection of the right to collective bargaining and collective action; Supranational supervisory mechanisms; Laval line of cases; Demir line of cases; Safeguarding social and labour rights as human rights; ILO protection of the right to strike.

  1. Adams R.J. (2008). The Supreme Court, Collective Bargaining and International Law: A Reply to Brian Langille’s ‘‘Can we Rely on the ILO?”. CLELJ, p. 317 ss.
  2. Ales E., Novitz T., Baylos A., eds. (2010). Collective Action and Fundamental Freedoms in Europe. Striking the Balance. Mortsel: Intersentia.
  3. Alston P., ed. (2005a). Labour Rights as Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Alston P., ed. (2005b). Non-State Actors and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Press.
  6. Arthurs H. (2006). Who’s afraid of globalization? Reflections on the future of labour law. In: Craig J.D.R, Lynk S.M., eds. Globalization and the Future of Labour Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 51 ss. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511495304.003
  7. Barbera M., a cura di (2007). Il nuovo diritto antidiscriminatorio: il quadro comunitario e nazionale. Milano: Giuffrè.
  8. Barbera M. (2012). Diritti sociali e crisi del costituzionalismo europeo. In: Borelli S., Guazzarotti A., Lorenzon S., a cura di, I diritti dei lavoratori nelle carte europee dei diritti fondamentali. Napoli: Jovene Editore, p. 229 ss.
  9. Barnard C. (2012). EU Employment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Barnard C. (2013). Free Movement and Labour Rights: Squaring the Circle? Legal Studies Research Paper Series 23/2013. University of Cambridge. Testo disponibile al sito: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2313088 (consultato il 24.4.2014). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2313088
  11. Bogg A., Ewing K.D. (2012). A (Muted) Voice at Work? Collective Bargaining In the Supreme Court of Canada. CLLPJ, p. 379 ss.
  12. Brino V. (2012). La giurisprudenza degli organi di controllo Oil e il dialogo virtuoso con la Corte di Strasburgo. In: Borelli S., Guazzarotti A., Lorenzon S., a cura di, I diritti dei lavoratori nelle carte europee dei diritti fondamentali. Napoli: Jovene Editore, p. 73 ss.
  13. Bronzini G. (2009). Diritto alla contrattazione collettiva e diritto di sciopero entrano nell’alveo protettivo della CEDU: una nuova frontiera per il garantismo sociale In Europa? RIDL, II, p. 975 ss.
  14. Bronzini G. (2012), I diritti dei lavoratori nelle Carte Europee dei Diritti Fondamentali: il ruolo della Corte di Giustizia. In: Borelli S., Guazzarotti A., Lorenzon S., a cura di, I diritti dei lavoratori nelle carte europee dei diritti fondamentali. Napoli: Jovene Editore, p. 3 ss. Bruun N., Malberg J. (2011). Lex Laval: Collective Actions and Posted Work In Sweden. In: Blanpain R., Heindrickx F., eds., Labour Law between Change and Tradition: Liber Amicorum Antoine Jacobs. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
  15. Bruun N. (2013). Prohibition of Discrimination under Article 14 European Convention on Human Rights. In: Dorssemont F., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and the Employment Relation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 367 ss.
  16. Carinci F. (2010). Piano, piano, dolce Carlotta: cronaca di un’Europa in cammino. ADL, p. 41 ss.
  17. Carabelli U. (2008), Note critiche a margine delle sentenze della Corte di Giustizia nei casi Laval e Viking. DLRI, p. 146 ss.
  18. Caruso B. (2010). I diritti sociali fondamentali dopo il Trattato di Lisbona (tanto tuonò che piovve). WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona. INT– 81/2010. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona-INT/20110209-010044_caruso_n81-2010intpdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  19. Caruso B. (2011). Costituzioni e diritti sociali: lo stato dell’arte. In: Caruso B., Militello M., a cura di, I diritti sociali tra ordinamento comunitario e Costituzione italiana: il contributo della giurisprudenza multilivello. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.Collective Volumes- 1/2011. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona-Collective%20Volumes/20110805-125007_caruso_bronzini_n1-2011sppdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  20. Caruso B., Militello M., a cura di (2011). I diritti sociali tra ordinamento comunitario e Costituzione italiana: il contributo della giurisprudenza multilivello. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”. Collective Volumes- 1/2011. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona-Collective%20Volumes/20110805-125007_caruso_bronzini_n1-2011sppdf.pdf(consultato il 24.4.2014).
  21. Collins H. (2006): Utility and rights in Common Law Reasoning: Rebalancing Private Law through Constitutionalization. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 6/2007.
  22. London School of Economics and Political Science. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/wps/WPS06-2007Collins.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1011727
  23. Collins H. (2011). Theories of Rights as Justifications for Labour Law. In: Davidov G., Langille B., eds., The Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 137 ss. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693610.003.0010
  24. Corazza L. (2013). Il nuovo conflitto collettivo. Clausole di tregua, conciliazione e arbitrato nel declino dello sciopero. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  25. Clapham A. (2006). Human Rights Obligation of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288465.001.000
  26. Compa L. (2009). Solidarity and Human Rights. A Response to Youngdahl. NLF, p. 38 ss.
  27. Costello C. (2006). The Bosphorus Ruling of the European Court of Human Rights: Fundamental Rights and Blurred Boundaries in Europe. HRLR, p. 87 ss. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngi038
  28. Craig P.P. (2013a). Pringle and Use of EU Institutions outside the EU Legal Framework: Foundations, Procedure and Substance. ECLR, p. 263 ss. DOI: 10.1017/S1574019612001149
  29. Craig P.P. (2013b). EU Accession to the ECHR: Competence, Procedure and Substance. FILJ, p. 1115 ss.
  30. De Salvia A. (2012). Il bilanciamento tra le libertà economiche e i diritti sociali collettivi operato dalla Corte di Giustizia è un contemperamento tra diritti equiordinati?. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – 98/2012. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle. lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA-INT/20121213-011134_desalvia_n98intpdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  31. De Stefano V. (2014). A tale of Oversimplication and Deregulation: the Mainstream Approach to Labour Market Segmentation and the Recent Responses to the Crisis in European Countries. ILJ, p. 253 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwuo14
  32. De Schutter O., Sant’Ana M. (2012). The European Committee of Social Rights (The ECSR). In: de Beco G., ed., Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms of the Council of Europe. London: Routledge, p. 71 ss.
  33. De Schutter O. (2013). Human Rights in Employment Relationships: Contracts as Power. In: Dorssemont F., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and the Employment Relation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 105 ss.
  34. Deakin S., Rogowski R. (2011). Reflexive Labour Law, Capabilities and the Future of Social Europe. In: Rogowski R., Salais R., Whiteside R., eds., Transforming European Employment Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 229 ss. DOI: 10.4337/9781781001172.00022
  35. Deakin S., Koukiadaki A. (2013). The sovereign debt crisis and the evolution of labour law in Europe. In: Countouris N., Freedland M., eds., Resocialising Europe in a time of crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 163 ss. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107300736.011
  36. Deakin S. (2008). Capacitas: Contract Law, Capabilities and the Legal Foundations of the Market. In: Supiot A., Deakin S., eds., Capacitas. Contract Law and the Institutional Preconditions of a Market Economy. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 1 ss.
  37. Deakin S. (2012). The Lisbon Treaty, the Viking and Laval judgments, and the financial crisis: in search of new foundations for Europe’s “social market economy”. In: Bruun N., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The Lisbon Treaty and Social Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 19 ss.
  38. Delfino M. (2014). La Corte e la Carta: un’interpretazione “utile” dei diritti e dei principi sociali fondamentali. Considerazioni a partire dal caso Association de médiation sociale. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – 103/2014. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA-INT/20140319-075809_delfino_n103-2014intpdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  39. Dorssemont F. (2010). The right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests under article 11 of the ECHR. An attempt “to Digest” the case law (1975-2009) of the European Court on Human Rights. ELLJ, p. 232 ss.
  40. Dorssemont F. (2011). How the European Court of Human Rights gave us Enerji to cope with Laval and Viking. In: Moreau M.A., ed., Before and after the economic crisis: what implications for the ‘European Social Model’? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 217 ss. DOI: 10.4337/9781849809955.00023
  41. Dorssemont F. (2013). The Right to Take Collective Action under Article 11 ECHR. In: Dorssemont F., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and the Employment Relation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 333 ss.
  42. Ewing K.D., Handy J. (2010). The Dramatic Implications of Demir and Baykara. ILJ, p. 41 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwp03
  43. Ewing K.D. (2003). The Implications of Wilson and Palmer. ILJ, p. 1 ss. DOI: 10.1093/ilj/32.1.
  44. Ewing K.D. (2012). The Draft Monti II Regulation: An Inadequate Response to Viking and Laval. London: Institute of Employment Rights.
  45. Ewing, K.D. (2013). Myth and Reality of the Right to Strike as a “Fundamental Labour Right”. IJCLLIR, p. 145 ss.
  46. Ferrante V. (2011). Dignità dell’uomo e diritto del lavoro. LD, p. 201 ss.
  47. Fontana G. (2014). Crisi economica ed effettività dei diritti sociali in Europa. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – 104/2014. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA-INT/20140321-085350_fontana_n104-2014intpdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  48. Fudge J. (2007). The New Discourse of Labour Rights: From Social to Fundamental Rights? CLLPJ, p. 29 ss.
  49. Fudge J. (2008). The Supreme Court of Canada and the Right to Bargain Collectively: The Implications of the Health Services and Support Case in Canada and Beyond. ILJ, p. 25 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwm038
  50. Gearty C., Mantouvalou V. (2011). Debating Social Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  51. Gernigon B., Odero A., Guido O. (1998). ILO principles concerning the right to strike. ILR, p. 441 ss.
  52. Giubboni S. (2012). Diritti e solidarietà in Europa. I modelli sociali nazionali nello spazio giuridico europeo. Bologna: il Mulino.
  53. Giubboni S. (2013). Cittadinanza, lavoro e diritti sociali nella crisi europea. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.INT – 100/2013. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DANTONA-INT/20130516-084221_giubboni_100-2013intpdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  54. Gottardi D. (2010). Tutela del lavoro e concorrenza tra imprese nell’ordinamento dell’Unione Europea. DLRI, p. 509 ss.
  55. Guazzarotti A. (2012). La Corte EDU come contrappeso: alla ricerca di sinergie tra Convenzione, Carta Sociale Europea e OIL. In: Borelli S., Guazzarotti A., Lorenzon S., a cura di, I diritti dei lavoratori nelle carte europee dei diritti fondamentali. Napoli: Jovene Editore, p. 127 ss.
  56. Guiglia G. (2011). The opportunities of the European Social Charter (in Italy). Testo disponibile al sito https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/socialcharter/presentation/Giuglia ArticleOpportunitiesESC_en.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  57. Hendrickx F., Van Bever A. (2013). Article 8 ECHR: Judicial Patterns of Employment Privacy Protection. In: Dorssemont F., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and the Employment Relation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 183 ss.
  58. Hendrickx F. (2013). Completing economic and social integration: towards labour law for the United States of Europe. In: Countouris N., Freedland M., Resocialising Europe in a time of crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 61 ss. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107300736.006
  59. Hepple B. (2010). Rethinking Laws Against Strikes. The 34th Countess Markievicz lecture of the Irish Association for Industrial Relations. University College Dublin. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.ul.ie/iair/content/countess-markievicz-lecture (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  60. Hepple B. (2013). The European Right to Strike revisited. DLRI, p. 575 ss. DOI: 10.3280/GDL2013-14000
  61. Jacobs A. (2013). Article 11 ECHR: The Right to Bargain Collectively under Article 11 ECHR. In: Dorssemont F., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and the Employment Relation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 309 ss.
  62. Holmes S., Sunstein C.R. (2000). The Cost of Rights: Why Liberty Depends on Taxes. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Khaliq U. (2014). The European Union and the European Social Charter: Never the twain shall meet? CYELS, 15, p. 169 ss.
  63. Kolben K. 2010. Labor Rights as Human Rights? VJIL, p. 449 ss.
  64. Kovács E. (2006). The right to strike in the European Social Charter. CLLPJ, p. 445 ss.
  65. La Hovary C. (2013). Showdown at the ILO? A historical perspective on the Employers’ group’s 2012 challenge to the right to strike. ILJ, p. 338 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwt020
  66. Langille B. (2008). Can we Rely on the ILO? CLELJ, p. 363 ss.
  67. Leary V.A. (1996). The Paradox of Workers’ Rights as Human Rights. In: Compa L.A., Diamond F.S., eds., Human Rights, Labor Rights and International Trade. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, p. 22 ss.
  68. Liebman S. (1993). Individuale e collettivo nel contratto di lavoro. Milano: Giuffre.
  69. Lörcher K. (2013). The New Social Dimension in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR): The Demir and Baykara Judgment, its Methodology and Follow-up. In: Dorssemont F., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and the Employment Relation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 3 ss.
  70. Mantouvalou V. (2012). Are Labour Rights Human Rights? ELLJ, p. 151 ss.
  71. Mantouvalou V. (2013). Labour Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: An
  72. Intellectual Justification for an Integrated Approach to Interpretation. HRLR, p. 529 ss. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngt00
  73. Martinico G., Pollicino O. (2012). The Interaction Between Europe’s Legal Systems. Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  74. Nolan A. (2009). Addressing Economic and Social Rights Violations by Non-state Actors through the Role of the State: A Comparison of Regional Approaches to the ‘Obligation to Protect’. HRLR, p. 225 ss.
  75. Mengoni (1975). I poteri dell’imprenditore. In: Id., Diritto e valori. Bologna: il Mulino, 1985, p. 357 ss.
  76. Novitz T. (2003). International and European Protection of the Right to Strike: A Comparative Study of Standards Set by the International Labour Organization, the Council of Europe and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298540.001.000
  77. Nussbaum M.C. (2011). Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.978067406120
  78. Oil (2009). Rules of the Game: A Brief Introduction to International Labour Standards. Ginevra: Oil.
  79. Orlandini G. (2012). La proposta di Regolamento Monti II e il diritto di sciopero nell’Europa Post-Lisbona. In: Borelli S., Guazzarotti A., Lorenzon S., a cura di, I diritti dei lavoratori nelle carte europee dei diritti fondamentali. Napoli: Jovene Editore, p. 157 ss.
  80. Persiani M. (1995). Considerazioni sul controllo di buona fede dei poteri del datore di lavoro. DL, p. 135 ss.
  81. Prassl J. (2013). Freedom of Contract as a General Principle of EU Law? Transfers of Undertakings and the Protection of Employer Rights in EU Labour Law: Case C-426/11 Alemo-Herron and others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd. ILJ, p. 434 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwt01
  82. Remida V. (2013). Il ruolo della soft-law nella protezione multilivello dell’autonomia collettiva. RGL, I, p. 783 ss.
  83. Ricci G. (2011). La costruzione giuridica del modello sociale europeo (con una postilla sul MSE al tempo della crisi globale). WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”. INT– 88/2011. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona-INT/20120112-044000_ricci_n88-2011intpdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014). Romeo G. (2013). La tecnica del non-finito nella costruzione del diritto costituzionale dell’Unione europea (nota a Cgeu 26.2.2013 Åklagaren c. Hans Åkerberg Fransson, causa C-617/10). DPCE, p. 551 ss.
  84. Rönnmar M. (2010). Laval returns to Sweden: The Final Judgment of the Swedish Labour Court and Swedish Legislative Reform. ILJ, p. 280 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwq013
  85. Rönnmar M., ed. (2011) Labour Law, Fundamental Rights and Social Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  86. Sciarra S., Malmberg J., Bruun N., Orlandini G., de Witte B., Lo Faro A., Zahn R., de Witte B. (2011). Il dopo Laval. Uno sguardo comparato. DLRI, p. 363 ss.
  87. Sciarra S. (2011). Metodo e linguaggio multilivello dopo la ratifica del Trattato di Lisbona. In: Caruso B., Militello M., a cura di, I diritti sociali tra ordinamento comunitario e Costituzione italiana: il contributo della giurisprudenza multilivello. WP C.S.D.L.E. “Massimo D’Antona”.Collective Volumes- 1/2011, p. 76 ss. --Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/Archive/WP/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona/WP%20CSDLE%20M%20DAntona-Collective%20Volumes/20110805-125007_caruso_bronzini_n1-2011sppdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  88. E%20M%20DAntona-Collective%20Volumes/20110805-125007_caruso_bronzini_n1-2011sppdf.pdf (consultato il 24.4.2014).
  89. Sciarra S. (2012). Un confronto a distanza: il diritto di sciopero nell’ordinamento globale. PD, p. 213 ss.
  90. Sciarra S. (2013). L’Europa e il lavoro. Solidarietà e conflitto in tempo di crisi. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  91. Syrpis P. (2011). Reconciling Economic Freedoms and Social Rights — The Potential of Commission v Germany (Case C-271/08, Judgment of 15 July 2010). ILJ, p. 221 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwr007
  92. Schlachter M. (2013). The European Social Charter: could it contribute to a more social Europe? In: Countouris N., Freedland M., Resocialising Europe in a time of crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 105 ss. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107300736.008
  93. 􀄝wi􀄅tkowski A.M. (2013). Resocialising Europe through a European Right to strike modelled on the Social Charter? In: Countouris N., Freedland M., Resocialising Europe in a time of crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 390 ss. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107300736.02
  94. Swepstone L. (2013), Crisis in the ILO supervisory system: Dispute over the Right to Strike. IJCLLIR, p. 199 ss.
  95. Tomba C. (2014). Supranational perspectives on the right to strike: A critical study of the legal sources and of their interpretation. Tesi di Dottorato in Diritto dell’Impresa. XXVI ciclo. Milano: Università Commerciale “Luigi Bocconi”.
  96. Vimercati A., a cura di (2009). Il conflitto sbilanciato. Libertà economiche e autonomia collettiva tra ordinamento comunitario e ordinamenti nazionali. Bari: Cacucci.
  97. Van Hiel I. (2013). The Right to Form and Join Trade Unions Protected by Article 11 ECHR. In: Dorssemont F., Lörcher K., Schömann I., eds., The European Convention on Human Rights and the Employment Relation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 287 ss.
  98. Wisskirchen A. (2005) The Standard-Setting and Monitoring Activity of the ILO: Legal Questions and Practical Experience. ILR, p. 235 ss.
  99. Youngdahl J (2009a). Solidarity first. Labor Rights Are Not the Same as Human Rights. NLF, p. 31 ss.
  100. Youngdahl J. (2009b). Youngdahl replies. NLF, p. 46 ss.
  101. Zahn R., de Witte B. (2011). La prospettiva dell’Unione europea: dare preminenza al mercato interno o rivedere la dottrina Laval? DLRI, p. 433 ss. DOI: 10.3280/GDL2011-131006
  102. Zoli C. (1988). La tutela delle posizioni «strumentali» del lavoratore. Dagli interessi legittimi alle clausole generali. Milano: Giuffré.
  103. Fudge J. (2012). Constitutional Rights, Collective Bargaining and the Supreme Court of Canada: Retreat and Reversal in the Fraser Case. ILJ, p. 1 ss. DOI: 10.1093/indlaw/dwr026

  • Giustizia sociale, commercio internazionale ed extraterritorialità "atipica". Il caso USMCA Adalberto Perulli, in GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI 170/2021 pp.215
    DOI: 10.3280/GDL2021-170003

Valerio De Stefano, La protezione del diritto di sciopero nella dialettica tra corti e organi di supervisione internazionali in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 143/2014, pp 461-494, DOI: 10.3280/GDL2014-143002