Negotiating health, mothering and "choice"

Journal title PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE
Author/s Rose Capdevila
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/1 Language English
Pages 21 P. 9-29 File size 102 KB
DOI 10.3280/PDS2015-001002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of this paper is to explore constructions of gender and mothering within the context of health psychology. The paper takes an explicitly critical feminist perspective to highlight issues around some of the assumptions of mainstream health psychology. It begins by exploring the theoretical issues around the conceptualisation of health as individualised and quantifiable. Two empirical studies on the experiences of mothers of young children, that I have been involved with, are then described and used to illustrate the practical implications of this conceptualisation. The first study, on post pregnancy body image, was able to identify narratives that do not unduly problematize, or pathologize, body image in pregnancy or post pregnancy. This approach thus offers mothers new, and more affirmative, ways of understanding their own experiences. The second study, which focused on mothers’ decision making in relation to childhood immunisation, found that mothers often draw on everyday processes, practices and relationships to explain their choices. The result of these processes was that immunization became a largely mundane and compliant activity rather than reflexive consumers of healthcare represented in the traditional literature. Finally, the paper concludes with some thoughts about the value of a more complex and nuanced approach to understanding and promoting health.

Keywords: Health, gender, mothering, feminism, methodology

  1. Brown K.F., Long S.J., Ramsay M., Hudson M.J., Green J., Vincent C.A., Kroll J.S., Fraser, G. and Sevdalis N. (2012). “UK parents” decision-making about measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) vaccine 10 years after the MMR-autism controversy: A qualitative analysis. Vaccine, 30: 1855-1864. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.12
  2. Brown S.R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  3. Butler J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
  4. Capdevila R. (2007). I did it my way: The implications of methodological choices in critical work. In: Van Deventer V., Terre Blance M., Fourie E. and Segalo P. (eds.). Citizen City: Between constructing agent and constructed agency. Concord, Canada: Captus University Publications.
  5. Carpenter C.J. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Communication, 25(8): 661-669. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2010.52190
  6. Cassell J.A., Leach M., Poltorak M.S., Mercer C.H., Iversen A. and Fairhead J.R. (2006). Is the cultural context of MMR rejection a key to an effective public health discourse?. Public Health, 120: 783-794. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.03.011
  7. Chamberlain K. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3): 285-296. DOI: 10.1177/13591053000050030
  8. Chamberlain K. and Murray M. (2009). Critical Health Psychology. In: Fox D. and Prilleltensky I. (eds.). Critical Psychology: An Introduction. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
  9. Cooper N., Stevenson C. and Hale G. (1996). The biopsychosocial model. Integrating Perspectives on Health, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 1-17.
  10. Crawford R. (2006). Health as a meaningful social practice. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 10: 401-420. DOI: 10.1177/136345930606731
  11. Crossley M. (2008). Critical health psychology: Developing and refining the approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1): 21-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00041.
  12. Deci E.L. and Ryan R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4): 227-268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_0
  13. Drake M.L., Verhulst D., Fawcett J. and Barger D.F. (1988). Spouses’ body image changes during and after pregnancy: A replication in Canada. Image, 20: 88-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1988.tb00037.
  14. Eccleston C., Williams C. and Stainton Rogers W. (1997). Patients’ and professionals’ understandings of the causes of chronic pain: blame, responsibility and identity protection. Social Science and Medicine, 45: 699-709. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00404-
  15. Ferriman A. (2004). MP raises new allegations against Andrew Wakefield. BMJ, 328(7442): 726.
  16. Fischman S.H., Rankin E.A., Soeken K.L. and Lenz E.R. (1986). Changes in sexual relationships in postpartum couples. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 15: 58-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1986.tb01369.
  17. Foucault M. (1969). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavisto k. Gardner B., Davies A., McAteer J. and Michie S. (2010). Beliefs underlying UK parents’
  18. views towards MMR promotion interventions: A qualitative study. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 15: 220-230. DOI: 10.1080/1354850100362396
  19. Gavey N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13: 459-475. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01014.
  20. Gomez Sanchez L. and Martin-Sevillano A.B. (2006). Feminism and identity in political psychology. Feminism and Psychology, 16(1): 65-72. DOI: 10.1177/0959-35350606082
  21. Hays S. (1996). The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Hale: Yale University Press.
  22. Henriques J., Hollway W., Urwin C., Venn C. and Walkerdine V. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
  23. Hilton S., Petticrew M. and Hunt K. (2006). “Combined vaccines are like a sudden onslaught to the body’s immune system”: Parental concerns about vaccine “overload” and “immune-vulnerability”. Vaccine, 24: 4321-4327. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.00
  24. Hisner P. (1987). Concerns of multiparas during the second postpartum week. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 16: 195-203. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1987.tb01457.
  25. Hogg M.A. and Vaughan G.M. (2008). Social Psychology. Harlow: Pearson.
  26. Horrocks C. and Johnson D.S. (eds.) (2012). Advances in health psychology: critical approaches. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Jackson C., Cheater F.M., Peacock R., Leask J. and Trevena L. (2010). Evaluating a webbased MMR decision aid to support informed decision-making by UK parents: A before-and-after feasibility study. Health Education Journal, 69: 74-83. DOI: 10.1177/001789691036314
  28. Jordan K., Capdevila R. and Johnson S. (2005). Baby or beauty: a Q study into post pregnancy body image. Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 23(1), 19-31. DOI: 10.1080/0264683051233133096
  29. Johnson S. and Capdevila R. (2014). “That’s just what’s expected of you… so you do it”: Mothers discussions around choice and the MMR vaccination. Psychology and health, (online), 1-33. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2014.89294
  30. Kitzinger C. (1987). The social construction of lesbianism. London: Sage.
  31. Kitzinger C. (1989). Liberal humanism as an ideology of social control: The regulation of lesbian identities. In: Shotter J. and Gergen K.J. (eds.). Texts of identity. London: Sage, pp. 82-98.
  32. Lee E.J., Macvarish J. and Bristow J. (2010). Risk, health and parenting culture. Health, Risk and Society, 12: 293-300. DOI: 10.1080/1369857100378973
  33. childhood vaccinations including MMR: A systematic review. Vaccine, 28: 4235-4248. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.05
  34. Brown K.F., Kroll J.S., Hudson M.J., Ramsay M., Green J., Long S.J., Vincent C.A., Fraser G. and Sevdalis N. (2010). Factors underlying parental decisions about combination
  35. Braun V. and Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3: 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063o
  36. Ajzen I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology and Health, 26(9): 1113-1127. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2011.61399
  37. Lyons A.C. and Chamberlain K. (2006). Health Psychology: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Mill J.S. (1909). Principles of political economy: with some of their applications to social
  39. philosophy (1848). London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
  40. Montero M. (2007). The psychology of liberation: From politics to ethics and back. Political Psychology, 28(5): 517-534. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00588.
  41. Moscovici S. (1972/2000). Society and theory in social psychology. In: Moscovici S. (ed.), Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 78-119.
  42. Moss-Morris R. (2011). Are illness representations key?. The Psychologist, 24(12): 899-899.
  43. Murray M. (2014). Social history of health psychology: Context and textbooks. Health Psychology Review, 8(2): 215-237, 81-23. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2012.70105
  44. Murray M. and Chamberlain K. (1999). Health psychology and qualitative research. In:
  45. Murray M. and Chamberlain K. (eds.). Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods. London: Sage, pp. 3-15.
  46. Murray M. and Poland B. (2006). Health psychology and social action. Journal of Health Psychology, 11: 379-384. DOI: 10.1177/135910530606330
  47. Nicholson P. (2001). Critical health psychology: A radical alternative to the mainstream? Psychology, Health and Medicine, 6: 256-265. DOI: 10.1080/1354850012343
  48. O’Dell C. and Brownlow C. (2005). Media reports of the link between MMR and autism: A discourse analysis. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33: 194-199. DOI: 10.1111/j.1354-4187.2005.00304.
  49. Pareek M. and Pattison H.M. (2000). The two-dose measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunisation schedule: Factors affecting maternal intention to vaccinate. British Journal
  50. of General Practice, 50: 969-971.
  51. Parker I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  52. Poltorak M., Leach M., Fairhead J. and Cassell J. (2005). MMR talk’ and vaccination choices: An ethnographic study in Brighton. Social Science and Medicine, 61: 709-719. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.01
  53. Potter J. and Wetherell M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
  54. Rosenstock I.M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education and Behavior, 2(4): 328-335. DOI: 10.1177/10901981740020040
  55. Shotter J. and Gergen K.J. (eds.) (1989). Texts of identity. London: Sage. Skea Z.C., Entwistle V.A., Watt I. and Russell E. (2008). Avoiding harm to others’ considerations in relation to parental measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination discussions
  56. – An analysis of an online chat forum. Social Science and Medicine, 67: 1382-1390. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.00
  57. Smailbegovic M.S., Laing G.J. and Bedford H. (2003). Why do parents decide against immunization?: The effect of health beliefs and health professionals. Child: Care, Health and Development, 29: 303-311. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2003.00347.
  58. Smith J.A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11: 261-271. DOI: 10.1080/0887044960840025
  59. Smith J.A., Flowers P. and Larkin M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage.
  60. Stainton Rogers R. (1995). Q Methodology. In: Smith J.A., Harré R. and Van Langenhove L. (eds.). Rethinking methods in psychology. Sage, London, pp. 178-192.
  61. Stainton Rogers W. (1991). Explaining health and illness: an exploration of diversity. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  62. Stanley M.B. (2002). Proles, entrepreneurs, or public scholars? American Behavioural Scientist, 45: 1170-1179. DOI: 10.1177/000276420204500701
  63. Stein A. and Fairburn C.G. (1996). Eating habits and attitudes in the postpartum period. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58: 321-325.
  64. Stenner P., Dancey C. and Watts S. (2000) The Understanding of their Illness amongst People with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Q methodological study. Social Science and Medicine, 51: 439-452.
  65. Stephenson W. (1935). Technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136: 279. DOI: 10.1038/136297b
  66. Sniehotta F. (2009). An experimental test of the theory of planned behavior. Applied Psychology: Health and WellBeing, 1(2): 257-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01013.
  67. Strang V.R. and Sullivan P.L. (1985). Body image attitudes during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 14: 332-337. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1985.tb02251.
  68. Tickner S., Leman P.J. and Woodcock A. (2010). Parents’ views about pre-school immunization: An interview study in Southern England. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36: 190-197. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01020.
  69. Walker L.O. (1998). Weight-related distress in the early months after childbirth. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 20: 30-44. DOI: 10.1177/01939459980200010
  70. Wakefield A.J., Murch S.H., Anthony A., Linnell J., Casson D.M., Malik M., Berelowitz M., Dhillon A.P., Thomson M.A., Harvey P., Valentine A., Davies S.E. and Walker-Smith J.A. (1998). Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, nonspecific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet, 351: 637-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11096-
  71. Watts S. and Stenner P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. London: Sage.
  72. Wilkinson S. (2004). Focus Group Research. In: D. Silverman (ed.) (2004). Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage.

Rose Capdevila, Negotiating health, mothering and "choice" in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 1/2015, pp 9-29, DOI: 10.3280/PDS2015-001002