Leveraging Learning Analytics in Formative Assessment: Insights from a Scoping Review of Blended Learning Courses in Higher Education

Titolo Rivista EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Autori/Curatori Elena Gabbi, Claudia Baiata, Maria Ranieri
Anno di pubblicazione 2026 Fascicolo 2025/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 24 P. 22-45 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa2-2025oa21745
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In recent years, the expansion of advanced digital technologies in the learning field has caused a deep change in educational platforms and revolutionized the tools and systems that support online learning. Within this context, the rapid development of Learning Analytics (LA) in blended and online higher education has transformed assessment practices, enabling personalized feedback and more targeted instructional strategies. This scoping review investigates how LA is integrated into formative assessment practices within blended learning courses in higher education. By analysing 13 selected studies, the review identifies the main techniques, purposes, and roles attributed to LA, such as student profiling, predictive modeling, teacher support, and feedback automation. The restricted number of papers examined could limit the broader applicability of the conclusions. However, findings highlight how LA is increasingly employed to support formative assessment in blended higher education, with methods such as process mining, predictive modeling, and visualization enabling more precise monitoring of student learning and the provision of timely, personalized feedback. Yet, the pedagogical challenge lies in ensuring that these tools are not reduced to mere instruments of control, but are instead leveraged to foster engagement, support teachers’ decision-making, and promote more inclusive and meaningful learning experiences.

Parole chiave:Learning Analytics;Formative Assessment;Scoping Review;blended learning;Higher Education

  1. Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., Van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review, 37, 100489.
  2. Barana, A., Conte, A., Fissore, C., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2019). Learning Analytics to improve Formative Assessment strategies. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3): 75-88.
  3. Bulut, O., Gorgun, G., Yildirim‐Erbasli, S.N., Wongvorachan, T., Daniels, L.M., Gao, Y., Lai, K.W., & Shin, J. (2023). Standing on the shoulders of giants: Online formative assessments as the foundation for predictive learning analytics models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1): 19-39.
  4. Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2019). The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (3rd edition). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  5. Gabbi, E. (2023). About or with teachers? A systematic review of learning analytics interventions to support teacher professional development. QWERTY, 18: 88-109.
  6. Gašević, D., Greiff, S., & Shaffer, D. W. (2022). Towards strengthening links between learning analytics and assessment: Challenges and potentials of a promising new bond. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107304.
  7. Gatrell, C., Muzio, D., Post, C., & Wickert, C. (2024). Here, there and everywhere: On the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) in management research and the peer‐review process. Journal of Management Studies, 61(3): 739-751.
  8. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Hoboken, NJ: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  9. Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., Gómez-González, C., Rojas-Murphy Tagle, A., & Lorca-Vyhmeister, A. (2021). Learning analytics in higher education: a preponderance of analytics but very little learning?. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18: 1-19.
  10. Hughes, N. (2025). Blended learning solutions in higher education: History, theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
  11. Marano, E., Newton, P. M., Birch, Z., Croombs, M., Gilbert, C., & Draper, M. J. (2024). What is the student experience of remote proctoring? A pragmatic scoping review. Higher Education Quarterly 78(3): 1031-1047.
  12. Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A. A., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2019). A systematic review of empirical studies on learning analytics dashboards: A self-regulated learning perspective. IEEE transactions on learning technologies, 13(2): 226-245.
  13. Merikko, J., Ng, K., Saqr, M., & Ihantola, P. (2022). To opt in or to opt out? Predicting student preference for learning analytics-based formative feedback. Ieee Access, 10: 99195-99204.
  14. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., ... & Prisma-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4(1): 1-10.
  15. Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British journal of educational technology, 50(1): 128-138.
  16. Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & management, 52(2): 183-199.
  17. Ranieri, M., & Gabbi, E. (2021). Esplorare le comunità professionali online attraverso i Learning Analytics per la formazione degli insegnanti. In: eTwinning e formazione degli insegnanti (pp. 161-173). Roma: Carocci.
  18. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Data mining and knowledge discovery, 10(3), e1355.
  19. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative health research, 13(7): 905-923.
  20. Sareen, S., & Mandal, S. (2024). Challenges of blended learning in higher education across global north south: A systematic and integrative literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101011.
  21. Siemens, G., & Gašević, D. (2012). Special issue on learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3): 1-163.
  22. Stanja, J., Gritz, W., Krugel, J., Hoppe, A., & Dannemann, S. (2023). Formative assessment strategies for students’ conceptions ‒ The potential of learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 58-75.
  23. Wise A. F. (2014, March). Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge LAK '14, March 24 - 28 2014 (pp. 203-211). New York, NY: ACM.
  24. Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Fernandez‐Nieto, G., Zhao, L., Li, X., ... & Martinez‐Maldonado, R. (2024). Evidence‐based multimodal learning analytics for feedback and reflection in collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(5): 1900-1925.
  25. Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3): 228-260.
  26. Zhang, K., Yılmaz, R., Ustun, A. B., & Yılmaz, F. G. K. (2023). Learning analytics in formative assessment: A systematic literature review. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 14(Özel Sayı): 359-381.
  27. APPENDIX
  28. Articles included in the study
  29. Biswas, U., & Bhattacharya, S. (2024). ML-based intelligent real-time feedback system for blended classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4): 3923-3951.
  30. Borter, N. (2023). Differential Effects of Additional Formative Assessments on Student Learning Behaviors and Outcomes. Studia paedagogica, 28(3): 9-38.
  31. Clutterbuck, P., & Lewis, D. (2019). Personalized Blended Learning via New Media and Formative Assessment. International Journal of Learning, 5(1): 12-18.
  32. Comerford, L., Mannis, A., DeAngelis, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I. A., & Beer, M. (2018). Utilising database-driven interactive software to enhance independent home-study in a flipped classroom setting: going beyond visualising engineering concepts to ensuring formative assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4): 522-537.
  33. Koh, E., Tee, Y. H., Suresh, D., & Caleon, I. (2020). A digital formative assessment intervention for cultivating teamwork skills. In ICLS 2020 Proceedings (pp. 1597-1600). ISLS.
  34. Kohnke, L., Foung, D., & Chen, J. (2022). Using learner analytics to explore the potential contribution of multimodal formative assessment to academic success in higher education. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221089957.
  35. Morais, A. M., Marenzi, I., & Kantz, D. (2015). The LearnWeb formative assessment extension: Supporting awareness and reflection in blended courses. In ARTEL@ EC-TEL (pp. 97-103). EC-TEL.
  36. Nguyen, V. A. (2017). The impact of online learning activities on student learning outcome in blended learning course. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(04), 1750040.
  37. Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128-138.
  38. Paredes, Y. V., & Hsiao, I. H. (2021). WebPGA: An educational technology that supports learning by reviewing paper-based programming assessments. Information, 12(11), 450.
  39. Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2014, June). Computer assisted, formative assessment and dispositional learning analytics in learning mathematics and statistics. In: International computer assisted assessment conference (pp. 67-78). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  40. Titov, S., Kurilov, A., Titova, N., & Brikoshina, I. (2019). Integrative assessment framework in blended learning. Technology, Education, Management, Informatics Journal, 8(3): 768-774.
  41. Xiaochun, G., & Yiwei, W. (2020, May). Experiments on Blended Learning and its Formative Assessment for Engineering Majors in Universities. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp. 16-20). New York, NY: ACM.

Elena Gabbi, Claudia Baiata, Maria Ranieri, Leveraging Learning Analytics in Formative Assessment: Insights from a Scoping Review of Blended Learning Courses in Higher Education in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 2/2025, pp 22-45, DOI: 10.3280/exioa2-2025oa21745