Aprire la black box dell’innovazione organizzativa: l’Intensità di Cura in pratica

Titolo Rivista MECOSAN
Autori/Curatori Elisa Giulia Liberati
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2015/95 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 25 P. 55-79 Dimensione file 20190 KB
DOI 10.3280/MESA2015-095004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Innovare verso un modello per Intensita delle Cure (IdC) offre agli ospedali importanti potenzialita di miglioramento, tanto a livello di erogazione delle cure quanto sul piano organizzativo e gestionale. L’introduzione del modello IdC implica, peraltro, sostanziali modifiche nella struttura organizzativa e professionale dell’ospedale tradizionale nonche nelle sue precedenti modalita di funzionamento, finora poco esplorate dalla letteratura. Il presente studio analizza i processi di cambiamento sociale che sottendono e danno forma all’innovazione IdC. Fondato sui risultati di un’indagine etnografica, lo studio mostra che l’innovazione non consiste in un mero processo di adattamento, ma piuttosto in una complessa interazione tra il nuovo modello organizzativo e la struttura sociale preesistente dell’ospedale (per esempio gerarchie, norme comportamentali, gerghi in uso, regole implicite per la regolazione di autonomia e potere). Tale interazione genera sia esiti desiderati, sia effetti inattesi, che richiedono governo e attenta considerazione. Cosi ad esempio la creazione di nuovi team e setting di cura puo portare alla rinegoziazione degli accordi impliciti riguardo all’autonomia degli infermieri, interpretata in modo differente da professionisti di diverse specialita. Il contributo approfondisce questi processi e propone riflessioni e linee d’azione per decisori e manager, al fine di colmare il divario tra i programmi formali e le pratiche di cura quotidiane, capitalizzando cosi le potenzialita dell’innovazione.;

Keywords:Innovazione, ospedale, intensita di Cura, etnografia, pratiche, sistema sociale

  1. Hammersley M. (2013). The myth of research-based policy and practice. London: Sage.
  2. Hogan H., Basnett I., McKee M. (2007). Consultants’ attitudes to clinical governance: barriers and incentives to engagement. Public Health, 121 (8): 614-622. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.12.013
  3. King L., Appleton J.V. (1999). Fourth generation evaluation of health services: Exploring a methodology that offers equal voice to consumer and professional stakeholders. Qualitative Health Research, 9 (5): 698-710. DOI: 10.1177/104973299129122072
  4. Kitchener M. (2000). The “Bureaucratization” of professional roles: the case of clinical directors in UK hospitals. Organization, 7 (1): 129-154. DOI: 10.1177/135050840071007
  5. Koch T. (2000). “Having a say”: negotiation in fourth‐generation evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31 (1): 117-125. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01253.x
  6. Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Lay M., Papadopoulos I. (2007). An exploration of fourth generation evaluation in practice. Evaluation, 13 (4): 495-504. DOI: 10.1177/135638900708213
  8. Lega F., DePietro C. (2005). Converging patterns in hospital organization: beyond the professional bureaucracy. Health Policy, 74 (3): 261-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.01.010
  9. Lega F., Mauri M., Prenestini A. (2010). L’ospedale tra presente e futuro. Milano: Egea. Levy A. (2002). Organisation. In Barus-Michel J., Enriquez E., Levy, A. (Ed.) Vocabulaire de Psychosociologie. Paris: Eres.
  10. Liberati E.G., Moja L. (2014). L’ospedale centrato sul paziente e ancora lontano. Ricerca e Pratica, 30: 4-11.
  11. Mays N., Pope C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320 (7226): 50-52. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50.
  12. Martin G. P. , Currie G., Finn R. (2009). Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the modernization of the medical work force. Social Science and Medicine, 68(7):1191-1198. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.006
  13. McDonald R., Harrison S., Checkland K. (2008). Identity, contract and enterprise in a primary care setting: an English general practice case study. Organization, 15 (3): 355-370. DOI: 10.1177/1350508408088534
  14. McKee M., Healy J. (2002). Hospital in a changing Europe. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  15. Minnick A.F., Mion L.C., Johnson M.E., Catrambone C. (2007). How Unit Level Nursing Responsibilities are Structured in US Hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration, 37 (10): 452-458. DOI: 10.1097/01.nna.0000285147.87612.96
  16. Mohrman S.A., Shani A.B. (Eds.) (2012). Organizing for sustainable healthcare. Organizing for Sustainable Series, Vol. 2. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. Moja L., Liberati E.G., Galuppo L., Gorli M., Maraldi M., Nanni O., Rigon G., Ruggieri P., Ruggiero F., Scaratti G., Vaona A., Kwag K.H. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of computerized clinical decision support systems in specialty hospitals: protocol for a qualitative cross-sectional study. Implemenation Science, 9: 105. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0105-0
  17. Nicolini D. (2012) Practice Theory, Work and Organization. An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  18. Orlikowski W.J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 11 (4): 404-428. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
  19. Ovretveit J. (2011). Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ quality and safety, 20 (1): i18-i23. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045955
  20. Powell A.E., Davies H.T.O. (2012). The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries. Social Science and Medicine, 75(5): 807-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.049
  21. Ryan G.W., Bernard H.R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field methods, 15 (1): 85-119.
  22. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W., Gray J.A., Haynes R.B., Richardson W.S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312 (7023): 71-72. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
  23. Scaratti G., Gorli M., Ripamonti S. (2009). The power of professionally situated practice analysis in redesigning organisations: A psycho-sociological approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 21(7): 538-554. DOI: 10.1108/13665620910985531
  24. Sorensen R., Paull G., Magann L., Davis J. (2013). Managing between the agendas: implementing health care reform policy in an acute care hospital. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27 (6): 698-713. DOI: 10.1108/jhom-11-2011-0119
  25. Stake R. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teacher College Record, 68: 523-540. Stame N. (2004). Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation, 10(1): 58-76. DOI: 10.1177/1356389004043135
  26. Timmermans S., Berg M. (2003). The practice of medical technology. Sociology of health and illness, 25(3): 97-114. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.00342
  27. Timmons S., Coffey F., Vezyridis P. (2014). Implementing lean methods in the Emergency Department: the role of professions and professional status. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 28 (2): 214-228. DOI: 10.1108/jhom-10-2012-0203
  28. Tsoukas H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic management journal, 17 (S2): 11-25. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250171104
  29. Van Maanen J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Villa S., Barbieri M., Lega F. (2009). Restructuring patient flow logistics around patient care needs: implications and practicalities from three critical cases. Health Care Management Science, 12(2): 155-165. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-008-9091-6
  30. Vos L., Chalmers S. E., Duckers M.L., Groenewegen P.P., Wagner, C., van Merode G.G. (2011). Towards an organisation-wide process-oriented organization of care: a literature review. Implementation Science, 6:8. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-8
  31. Waring J.J., Bishop S. (2010). Lean healthcare: rhetoric, ritual and resistance. Social Science and Medicine, 71 (7): 1332-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.028
  32. Waltson S.L., Kimberley J.R. (1997). Reengineering hospitals: evidence from the field. Journal of ealthcare Management, 42 (2): 143.
  33. Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  35. Gremler D.D. (2004). The critical incident technique in service research. Journal of service research, 7 (1): 65-89. DOI: 10.1177/1094670504266138
  36. Gherardi S. (2012) How to conduct a practice-based study: Problems and methods. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  37. Gherardi S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of organizing. London: Blackwells.
  38. Gherardi S. (2000). Practice-based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations. Organization, 7 (2): 211-223. DOI: 10.1177/135050840072001
  39. Fournier V. (2000). Boundary work and the (un) making of professions. In: Malin N. (a cura di). Professionalism, boundaries and the workplace. London: Routledge.
  40. Flanagan J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological bulletin, 51 (4): 327-358. DOI: 10.1037/h0061470
  41. Fitzgerald L., Dopson S. (2005). Professional boundaries and the diffusion of innovation. In: Dopson S., Fitzgerald L. (a cura di). Knowledge to Action? Evidence-based Health Care in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  42. Ferlie E., Fitzgerald L., Wood M., Hawkins C. (2013). The Nonspread of Innovations : The Mediating Role of Professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (1): 117-134. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993150
  43. Eccles M.P., Armstrong D., Baker R., Cleary K., Davies H., Davies S., Sibbald B. (2009). An implementation research agenda. Implement Science, 4(1): 18. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18
  44. Drotz E., Poksinska B. (2014). Lean in Healthcare from Employees’ Perspectives. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 28 (2): 177-195. DOI: 10.1108/jhom-03-2013-0066
  45. Dixon Woods M., Bosk C.L., Aveling E.L., Goeschel C.A., Pronovost P.J. (2011). Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Quarterly, 89 (2): 167-205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00625.x
  46. Degeling P., Maxwell S., Kennedy J., Coyle B. (2003). Medicine, management, and modernisation: a “danse macabre”? British Medical Journal, 326 (7390): 649-652. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7390.64
  47. Czarniawska B. (2007). Shadowing: and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
  48. Cunliffe A.L. (2014). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about management. London: Sage.
  49. Cunliffe A.L. (2001). Managers as practical authors: Reconstructing our understanding of management practice. Journal of Management Studies, 38 (3): 351-371. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00240
  50. Currie G., Finn R., Martin G. (2010). Role Transition and the Interaction of Relational and Social Identity: New Nursing Roles in the English NHS. Organization Studies, 31 (7): 941-961. DOI: 10.1177/0170840610373199
  51. Charmaz K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
  52. Chantler C. (1989). Be a manager. British Medical Journal, 298(6686): 1505-8. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.298.6686.1505
  53. Carbone C., Cosmi L., Lega F., Salvatore D. (2006). Ricognizione sullo stato dell’arte e sulle tendenze della normativa regionale in materia di organizzazione delle aziende sanitarie. Organizzazione sanitaria, 1: 25-32.
  54. Brown J.S., Duguid P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California management review, 40 (3): 90-111. DOI: 10.2307/41165945
  55. Bridges J., Fitzgerald L., Meyer J. (2007). New workforce roles in health care: Exploring the longer-term journey of organisational innovations. Journal of health organization and management, 21 (4/5): 381-392. DOI: 10.1108/1477726071077891
  56. Allen D. (2009). From boundary concept to boundary object: the practice and politics of care pathway development. Social Science & Medicine, 69 (3): 354-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.002
  57. Abbott A. (1988). The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
  58. Yanow D. (2009). Organizational ethnography and methodological angst: myths and challenges in the field. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 4(2): 186-199. DOI: 10.1108/1746564091097842
  59. Ybema S., Yanow D., Wels H., Kamsteeg F.H. (Eds.). (2009). Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexity of everyday life. London: Sage.

  • Organizzazione della Struttura Complessa di Medicina interna per intensità di cure: l'Area critica di Medicina interna Francesco Ventrella, Francesca Fortunato, in MECOSAN 112/2020 pp.7
    DOI: 10.3280/MESA2019-112002

Elisa Giulia Liberati, Aprire la black box dell’innovazione organizzativa: l’Intensità di Cura in pratica in "MECOSAN" 95/2015, pp 55-79, DOI: 10.3280/MESA2015-095004