Use and users of FADN data in Italy

Titolo Rivista Economia agro-alimentare
Autori/Curatori Sonia Marongiu, Barbara Bimbati, Mauro Santamgelo
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2021/3 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 0 P. 1-21 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ecag2021oa12770
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) is a sample survey that annually gathers information from more than 80,000 European farms. Its main aim is to provide data to the EU Commission used in the assessment of farm profitability and in the evaluation of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) impacts.FADN results are also used and published nationally in almost all the Member States. The Italian fadn (named RICA - Rete Italiana di Contabilità Agricola) provides data for stakeholders and researchers, serving as an important source of information for specific analysis and meeting a wide range of policy needs.Data are stored in an online database, available for institutional users under an agreement or a formal accession request. For non-institutional users, a public Datawarehouse supplies/provides selected information already aggregated by farm type, economic size, and region. Like other surveys, FADN can be considered as a public good, whose general benefit and utility depends also on its impact on users. One way to evaluate these benefits is the identification of users, the data used and their level of satisfaction. This monitoring activity is not performed in the Italian FADN: users and usage are not always tracked and the information about their satisfaction is lacking. The paper investigates this aspect (which has been called “inherent data dissemination” for the first time, focusing on the extent and ways in which fadn is made available: the most important area of analysis covered by the data. Two instruments are examined: the FADN database online (BDR) and the request forms submitted to CREA to ask for customized tables based on a set of selected variables. The first tool has been analyzed by submitting a questionnaire to the list of users, while for the request forms, all the submissions processed during the period 2011-2020 have been examined.

Keywords:FADN; RICA; Informative needs; Users’ analysis

  1. Abbott, P., Boussios, D. & Lowenberg DeBoer, J. (2016). Valuing Public Information in Agricultural Commodity Markets: WASDE Corn Reports, Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 234902, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.234902.
  2. Arzberger, P., Schröeder, P., Beaulieu, A., Bowker, G., Casey, K., Laaksonen, L., Moorman, D., Uhlir, P. & Wouters, P. (2006). Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development. Data Science Journal, 3, 135-152, DOI: 10.2481/dsj.3.135.
  3. Fienberg, S.E., Martin, M.E. & Straf, M.L. (Eds.) (1985). Sharing research data. Washington DC: National Academic Press.
  4. Garcia, P., Irwin, S.H., Leuthold, R.M. & Yang, L. (1997). The value of public information in commodity futures markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 32(4), 559-570, DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00013-9.
  5. Gastaldin, N., Marongiu, S. & Turchetti, L. (2021). La RICA e i futuri fabbisogni informativi, in Utilizzi e utilizzatori attuali e futuri della RICA italiana (a cura di Marongiu, Turchetti). CREA-PB.
  6. Gastaldin, N. & Turchetti L. (2021). Analisi qualitative della rilevazione RICA , in Utilizzi e utilizzatori attuali e futuri della RICA italiana (a cura di Marongiu, Turchetti), CREA-PB.
  7. Hill, B. & Bradley, D. (2016). Comparative analysis of the FADN Data collection systems in EU-28. Contributed paper prepared for presentation at the 90th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, University of Warwick, England, 4-6 April 2016.
  8. Hill, B., Bradley, D. & Vrolijk, H. (2016). Uses and benefits of FADN information in the EU-28. Eurochoices, 15(3), 11-15, DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12138.
  9. istat (2019). Rilevazione sul grado di soddisfazione relativo ai prodotti e ai servizi offerti sul web. Direzione Centrale per la comunicazione, informazione e servizi ai cittadini e agli utenti, Roma.
  10. Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. & Stern, M. (1999). Defining Global Public Goods. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.
  11. Kelly, E., Latruffe, L., Desjeux, Y., Ryan, M., Uthes, S., Diazabakana, A., Dillon, E. & Finn, J. (2018). Sustainability indicators for improved assessment of the effects of agricultural policy across the EU: is FADN the answer? Ecological indicators, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.053.
  12. Marongiu, S. (2021). Rassegna della letteratura: stato dell’arte. In Marongiu, S. & Turchetti, L. (a cura di). Utilizzi e utilizzatori attuali e futuri della RICA italiana. CREA-PB.
  13. National Research Council (1999). A Question of Balance: private rights and public interest in Scientific and Technical Databases. Washington DC: National Academic Press.
  14. Turchetti, L., Gastaldin, N. & Marongiu, S. (2021). Enhancing the Italian FADN for sustainability assessment: State of art and perspectives. Economia Agro-Alimentare / Food Economy, 23(3), 1-21, DOI: 10.3280/ecag3-oa12771.
  15. Samuelson, P.A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389.
  16. Stiglitz, J.E. (1999). Knowledge as a Global Public Good’. In Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. & Stern, M.A. (Eds.). Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (pp. 308-325). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Uhlir, P. & Schröeder, P. (2007). Open data for Global Science. Data Science Journal, DOI: 10.2481/dsj.6.OD36.
  18. UNECE (2018). Recommendations for Promoting, Measuring and Communicating the Value of Official Statistics. ECE/CES/STAT/2018/2. United Nations, Geneva (Switzerland).
  19. Verschraegen, G. & Schiltz, M. (2007). Knowledge as a Global Public Good: The Role and Importance of Open Access. Societies Without Borders, 2(2): 157-174, DOI: 101163/187219107X203540.
  20. Vrolijk, H., Poppe, K. & Keszthelyi, S. (2016). Collecting sustainability data in different organisational settings of the European Farm Accountancy Data Network. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 115, 138-144, DOI: 10.7896/j.1626.
  21. World Bank (2010). Global strategies to improve agricultural and rural statistics. Economic and Sector Work. Report Number 56719-GLB.

  • Economic and Environmental Sustainability Trade-Off Analysis in Sheep Farming Using the Farm Accountancy Data Network Database Paola Sau, Brunella Arru, Federica Cisilino, Roberto Furesi, Pietro Pulina, Fabio A. Madau, in Sustainability /2023 pp.16621
    DOI: 10.3390/su152416621

Sonia Marongiu, Barbara Bimbati, Mauro Santamgelo, Use and users of FADN data in Italy in "Economia agro-alimentare" 3/2021, pp 1-21, DOI: 10.3280/ecag2021oa12770