Green growth or degrowth? Evaluating the potential of technology for sustainability

Titolo Rivista: ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori: Parakram Pyakurel
Anno di pubblicazione: 2021 Fascicolo: 1 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 16 P. 21-36 Dimensione file: 267 KB
DOI: 10.3280/EFE2021-001002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The raging debate between green growth and degrowth continues. Technology is a focal point in this debate as the advocates of green growth and degrowth have contradictory views on the roles and impacts of technology on environment and society. Green growth advocates believe that technology can allow indefinite growth while simultaneously ensuring environmental and societal sustainability, whereas the degrowth advocates argue that technological progress cannot allow indefinite growth. These views are largely opinion based rather than informed by objective and systematic analyses because comprehensive tools to evaluate the roles and impacts of technology on environment and society do not yet exist. This paper develops a much-needed framework to comprehensively evaluate the roles of technology on environment and society by analysing the interactions among the dimensions of technology, environment, economy and society. Key parameters that characterise technology are proposed for its evaluation and the policy implications of technological evaluations are examined. Finally, potential future research directions are explored. The technological evaluation approach proposed in this paper has a potential to significantly advance the green growth versus degrowth debate.

  1. Sagar, A.D., Najam, A. (1998). The human development index: a critical review. Ecological Economics, 25(3): 249-264. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00168-7
  2. Anadon, L.D. et al. (2016). Making technological innovation work for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Sciences of the United States of America, 113(35): 9682-9690.
  3. Anand, S., Sen, A.K. (1994). Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement. Human Development Report Office – Occasional Papers. Available at: -- https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:98d15918-dca9-4df1-8653-60df6d0289dd/download_file? file_format=application/pdf&safe_filename=HDI_methodology.pdf&type_of_work= Report.
  4. Asayama, S., Ishii, A. (2017). Selling stories of techno-optimism? The role of narratives on discursive construction of carbon capture and storage in the Japanese media. Energy Research & Social Science, 31: 50-59.
  5. Bernauer, T., Koubi, T.B.V. (2012). Environmental changes and violent conflict. Environmental Research Letters, 7(1).
  6. Bhargawa, A., Singh, A.K. (2019). Solar irradiance, climatic indicators and climate change – An empirical analysis. Advances in Space Research, 64(1): 271-277.
  7. Biggeri, M., Mauro, V. (2018). Towards a more ‘Sustainable’ Human Development Index: Integrating the environment and freedom. Ecological Indicators, 91: 220-231.
  8. Boonstra, W.J., Joosse, S. (2013). The Social Dynamics of Degrowth. Environmental Values, 22(2): 171-189.
  9. Buch-Hansen, H. (2018). The Prerequisites for a Degrowth Paradigm Shift: Insights from Critical Political Economy. Ecological Economics, 146: 157-163.
  10. Burke, P.J., Csereklyei, Z. (2016). Understanding the energy-GDP elasticity: A sectoral approach. Energy Economics, 58: 199-210.
  11. Čavoški, A. (2017). The unintended consequences of EU law and policy on air pollution. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 26: 255-265.
  12. Chenoweth, J., Feitelson, E. (2005). Neo-Malthusians and Cornucopians put to the test: Global 2000 and The Resourceful Earth revisited. Futures, 37(1): 51-72.
  13. Hasan, D., Yüksel, S., Adalı, Z., Aydın, R. (2019). Evaluating the Role of Research and Development and Technology Investments on Economic Development of E7 Countries. In: Organizational Transformation and Managing Innovation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
  14. Doris, F. et al. (2020). Which Way Forward in Measuring the Quality of Life? A Critical Analysis of Sustainability and Well-Being Indicator Sets. Global Environmental Politics, 20(2): 12-36.
  15. Drupp, M.A., Meya, J.N., Baumgärtner, S., Quaas, M.F. (2018). Economic Inequality and the Value of Nature. Ecological Economics, 150: 340-345.
  16. Feenberg, A. (1990). The Ambivalence of Technology. Sociological Perspectives, 33(1): 35-50. DOI: 10.2307/1388976
  17. Gonella, F. et al. (2019). Is technology optimism justified? A discussion towards a comprehensive narrative. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223: 456-465.
  18. Grunwald, A. (2018). Diverging pathways to overcoming the environmental crisis: A critique of eco-modernism from a technology assessment perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(2): 1854-1862.
  19. Guo, L.L., Qu, Y., Tseng, M.L. (2017). The interaction effects of environmental regulation and technological innovation on regional green growth performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162: 894-902.
  20. Hernandez, Y., Naumann, G., Corral, S., Barbosa, P. (2020). Water Footprint Expands with Gross Domestic Product. Sustainability, 12(20): 8741.
  21. Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., Stavins, R.N. (2003). Chapter 11 – Technological change and the Environment. Handbook of Environmental Economics, 1: 461-516. DOI: 10.1016/S1574-0099(03)01016-7
  22. Kahneman, D. (1994). New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 150(1): 18-36.
  23. Keary, M. (2016). The New Prometheans: Technological Optimism in Climate Change Mitigation Modelling. Environmental Values, 25(1): 7-28.
  24. Kerschne, C., Ehlers, M.H. (2016). A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 126: 139-151.
  25. Lawson, C. (2008). An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12(1): 48-64.
  26. Laugs, G.A.H., Moll, H.C. (2017). A review of the bandwidth and environmental discourses of future energy scenarios: Shades of green and gray. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67: 520-530.
  27. Leoncini, R. (1998). The nature of long-run technological change: innovation, evolution and technological systems. Research Policy, 27(1): 75-93.
  28. Link, A.N. (1993). Evaluating the Advanced Technology Program: a preliminary assessment of economic impacts. International Journal of Technology Management, 8(6-8). DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.1993.025808
  29. Mercure, J.F. et al. (2016). Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy. Global Environmental Change, 37: 102-115.
  30. Mirza, M.U., Richter, A., van Nes, E.H., Marten Scheffer, M. (2019). Technology driven inequality leads to poverty and resource depletion. Ecological Economics, 160: 215-226.
  31. Modrak, V., Soltysova, Z. (2018). Process modularity of mass customized manufacturing systems: principles, measures and assessment. Procedia CIRP, 67: 36-40.
  32. Munir, K., Ameer, A. (2018). Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanization, and technology on environment of Asian emerging economies. Management of Environmental Quality, 29(6). DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-05-2018-0087
  33. Nasrollahi, Z., Hashemi, M.S., Bameri, S., Taghvaee, V.M. (2020). Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: using STIRPAT model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22: 1105-1122.
  34. OECD (2020). OECD Work on Green Growth 2019-20. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: -- https://issuu.com/oecd.publishing/docs/ gg_brochure_2019_web.
  35. Perez, C. (2016). Capitalism, Technology and a Green Global Golden Age: The Role of History in Helping to Shape the Future. BTTR Working Paper Series. Available at: -- https:// beyondthetechrevolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/BTTR_WP_2016-1.pdf.
  36. Safarzyńska, K., den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2017). Integrated crisis-energy policy: Macro-evolutionary modelling of technology, finance and energy interactions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114: 119-137.
  37. Sampson, R.J. (2017). Urban sustainability in an age of enduring inequalities: Advancing theory and ecometrics for the 21st-century city. PNAS, 114(34): 8957-8962.
  38. Sandberg, M., Klockars, K., Wilén, K. (2019). Green growth or degrowth? Assessing the normative justifications for environmental sustainability and economic growth through critical social theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206: 133-141.
  39. Vélez-Henao, J.A., Vivanco, D.F., Hernández-Riveros, J.A. (2019). Technological change and the rebound effect in the STIRPAT model: A critical view. Energy Policy, 129: 1372-1381.
  40. Vinuesa, R. et al. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11, Article number: 233.
  41. Whyte, K.P., Gunderson, R., Clark, B. (2017). Is Technology use insidious? In: Kaplan, D.M. (ed). Philosophy, Technology, and the environment. The MIT Press.
  42. Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Bento, N., Healey, S., Stercke, S.D., Zimm, C. (2020). Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization. Science, 368(6486): 36-39.

  • Investigating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure and Tourism on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China Qiang Zhang, Muhammad Tayyab Sohail, in Journal of Environmental and Public Health /2022 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/8421756
  • The Impact of Environmental Technology and Environmental Policy Strictness on China’s Green Growth and Analysis of Development Methods Yiming Wu, Yichao Zhang, Muhammad Tayyab Sohail, in Journal of Environmental and Public Health /2022 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/1052824

Parakram Pyakurel, Green growth or degrowth? Evaluating the potential of technology for sustainability in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2021, pp 21-36, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2021-001002