La transizione postcarolingia nel Regno italico (888-1115) e il principato territoriale
Journal title SOCIETÀ E STORIA
Author/s Roberto Ricci
Publishing Year 2009 Issue 2009/125 Language Italian
Pages 28 P. 395-422 File size 719 KB
DOI 10.3280/SS2009-125001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The postcarolingian transition in the Italico Reign (888-1115). Some aspects - The study takes in consideration an aspect of the so-called postacarolingian transition in the italico Reign, the territorial principato one. Being based mainly on the studies of Giovanni Tabacco, Giuseppe Sergi and Mario Nobili the author considers several political-institutional experiences, from Adalberto of Tuscia to the Obertenghi, from the Arduinici to the Canossani. They come explored the several experimentations of being able that they stretch to construct to political structures who place like intermediate powers between the signorili nuclei and the reign. They come touched also arguments details, as the mutation of regal attitude in the comparisons of the aristocracy, that it passes from the concession of funzionariali delegations to a hybrid situation that stretches to the feudalizzazione of the offices publics. Equally it comes taken in consi- deration an important political factor, represented from the Reform. It comes at last faced also the cultural aspect, putting in evidence the existence of a "political ideology" that stretches to the imitatio regis.
Keywords: Transitio; Experimentations; Principato; Feudalizzazione; Reform; Ideology.
Roberto Ricci, La transizione postcarolingia nel Regno italico (888-1115) e il principato territoriale in "SOCIETÀ E STORIA " 125/2009, pp 395-422, DOI: 10.3280/SS2009-125001