Les circuits de distribution des vins bio en France

Autori/Curatori: Tatiana Bouzdine-Chameeva, Coralie Rames-Briois, Philippe Barbe
Anno di pubblicazione: 2013 Fascicolo: 3 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 21 P. 103-123 Dimensione file: 1128 KB
DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2013-003007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Since 2006 the conversion of vineyards to organic or biodynamic vineyards has been accelerating in France, and the annual rate of conversion varies between 20- 25% per year, attaining the total surface of 61.055 ha of bio vineyards in 2011. This growth is even more striking in the light of the shrinking total surface of vineyards and the decreasing trend of wine consumption in France. In this challenging context, we attempt to analyze which of the classic wine distribution channels are conducive to French bio wine producers. The study is grounded in a series of interviews in several regions of France on a variety of distribution practices employed by natural wine producers. The research methodology employs content analysis and cognitive mapping technique. While the bio wine distribution system appears to be diversified and mobilizes all the classic channels, direct sales and export appear to be of particular relevance. Our findings confirm the impact of extra production costs (from 15 to 30%) on the choice of an appropriate channel. This extra production cost, explained mainly by higher labor costs and partly justified by the higher quality of wines, typically results in higher prices which the final consumer must pay. In this case direct sales could be seen the most remunerative as a producer’s margins are not squeezed in intermediate transactions. A closer relation between a producer and a consumer also adds value to the product: consumers perceive bio wine primarily as a wine, a cultural product which witnesses the diversity of terroirs. The presented analysis of bio wines distribution channels will allow practitioners to better adjust their distribution strategies.

  1. Agence bio (2011). La viticulture bio en France. Report published online www.agencebio.org/upload/actu/fichier/Ficheviticulturebio.pdf.
  2. Blanchet, A., & Gotman A. (2007). L’enquête et ses méthodes – L’entretien. Paris: Éd. Armand Colin.
  3. Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., & Ninomiya, M. (2011). Bordeaux natural wines on the Japanese market: analysis of supply chain system’ indolence. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 12(2): 56-67.
  4. Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2006) Modelling of distinctive competencies in strategic development of Bordeaux wine sector: comparison based on causal representations. British Food Journal, Emeralds, Special issue on Wine strategies, 108(4): 273-289.
  5. Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2012). An application of the dea methodology in wine sector: the comparison of traditional versus “bio” wine companies in terms of production and efficiency value. Actes du colloque ROADEF, Avril 11-13. France: Angers.
  6. Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., & Krzywoszynska, A. (2011). Barriers and driving forces in organic winemaking in Europe: case studies in France and Italy. Proceedings of the 6th International Academy of Wine Business Research conference, June 9-11, Bordeaux, France.
  7. Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. & Michrafy, M. (2009), Carte Cognitive Collective et Décision de Groupe. Dans l’ouvrage collectif, J.-F. Trinquecoste, J.-C. Sallabery (eds). Pilotage des organisations: Enjeux et empli des représentations. Paris: Harmattan: 145-166.
  8. Brugarolas, M.-B., Perez, R. (2005). Determination of the surplus that consumers are willing to pay for an organic wine. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(1): 43-51.
  9. Delmas, M.A., & Grant, L. (2008). Eco-labeling strategies: The eco-premium puzzle in the wine industry. AAWE Working paper, 13: 33.
  10. Downs, R.M., & Stea, D. (1973). Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behavior: Process and Products. In Downs, R.M., & Stea, D. (Eds.). Image and environment. Chicago: Aldine: 8-26.
  11. Chabin, Y., Mueller, S., & Remaud, H. (2012). Perception des vins AB par les consummateurs. http://bioconvergence.org/site-media/uploads/etude_et_perception_des_ consommateurs.pdf.
  12. Cholette, S, Mauracher, C., Canavari, M., & Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. (2011). Postponement Practices in the Wine Industry: A Cross-Country Comparison of Adaptation and Attitudes. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of American Association of Wine Economists, June 26-28, Bolzano, Italy.
  13. Compadre, C. (2013). La consommation de vin bio à la recherche d’un second souffle. Sud-Ouest, 19 mars 2013.
  14. Cossette, P. (1994). Cartes cognitives et organisations. Collection Sciences de l’administration. Québec/Paris: Les Presses de l’Université Laval/Éditions ESKA.
  15. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy: the journey of strategic management. London: Sage.
  16. Galbrun, C. (2013). Les vins bios une tendance lourde, Reussir Vigne, 194: 31-32.
  17. Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.
  18. Lockshin, L., Remaud, H., Mueller, S., & Phoebe, Ch. (2008). Do Australian wine consumers value organic wine?. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Academy of Wine Business Research, July 17-19, Siena, Italy.
  19. Mueller, S., Remaud, H., & Chabin, Y. (2011). Consumers’ willingness to pay for sustainable wine claims: An international comparison. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Wine Economists, June 26-28, Bolzano, Italy.
  20. Mora, P. (2007). Le commerce du vin: Panorama, Perspectives. Paris: Éd. Dunod.
  21. Mora, P., Akhter, M., & et Bey, C. (2012). Pourquoi entreprendre une conversion dans la viticulture biologique? Journée de recherché “Innovation & Tradition”, Septembre 22, bem - Bordeaux Management School, France.
  22. Rames-Briois, C. (2012). Les circuits de distributions des vins bios, Mémoire de Recherche Appliquée, Programme spécialisé mvs, bem - Bordeaux Management School: 165.
  23. Rouzet, E., & Seguin, G. (2006). Le marketing du vin, Dunod: 260.
  24. Scavarda, A.J., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Goldstein, S.M., Hays, J.M. & Hill, A.V. (2006). A Methodology for constructing collective causal maps. Decision Sciences, 37(2): 263-284. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2006.00124.x
  25. Vastola, A. & Tanyeri-Abur, A. (2009). Non-Conventional viticulture as a viable system: A case study in Italy. AAWE Working Paper, 43: 20.

Tatiana Bouzdine-Chameeva, Coralie Rames-Briois, Philippe Barbe, Les circuits de distribution des vins bio en France in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 3/2013, pp 103-123, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2013-003007