Social agriculture and detention: the experience of the Cooperative 153 in Capanne district prison in Perugia

Author/s Paola de Salvo, Viviana Calzati
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/109 Language Italian
Pages 18 P. 129-146 File size 489 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2016-109009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In the last ten years numerous studies have highlighted the relationship of agriculture to the environment, together with other sectors of the economy and of society. This relationship have attributed a diverse and broader role to agriculture from that which was previously its traditional position. In particular, its multifunctionality is an indication of the capacity of agriculture to respond to changing societal and consumer needs/requirements. In this present work, after having identified the characteristics and the defining aspects of social agriculture, particular attention is paid to the rehabilitative role of agricultural work for inmates in detention or serving prison sentences, identifying it as a useful experience to improve the quality of life and to promote future social and labour integration. The paper presents the case study of the 153 Social Cooperative, which has created a social society for the management and evaluation of the agricultural activity of the district prison in Capanne.

Keywords: Agricultural Multifunctionality, Social Agriculture, Rehabilitative Role, Detention, Social and Labour Inclusion, Cooperative 153

  1. AIAB (2007). L’agricoltura oltre le mura. I risultati della ricerca di AIAB sulle attività agricole negli istituti penitenziari. Roma: In Quaderno AIAB 1
  2. Anastasia S. (2011). Inclusione, esclusione e coesione sociale: i paradossi del carcere. In: Minori Giustizia, 1: 158-162. DOI: 10.3280/MG2011-00101
  3. Baratta A. (2001). Diritto alla sicurezza o sicurezza dei diritti? In Anastasia S., Palma M. (a cura di). La bilancia e la misura. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  4. Benelli C. (2010). Il carcere e l’inclusione sociale. In M. Striano (a cura di). Pratiche educative per l’inclusione sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Belletti G., Berti G. (2011). Turismo, ruralità e sostenibilità attraverso l’analisi delle configurazioni turistiche. In Pacciani A. (a cura di). Aree rurali e configurazioni turistiche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  6. Brunori G., Rand S., Proost J. (2008). Towards a conceptual framework for agricultural and rural innovation policies, Deliverables 1 IN5SIGHT project: Strengthening Innovation Processes for Growth and Development
  7. Burch D., Lawrence G. (2009). Towards a third food regime: Behind the transformation. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(4): 267–279. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-009-9219-
  8. Burls A. (2005). New landscapes for mental health. Mental Health Review, 10: 26–29. DOI: 10.1108/1361932220050000
  9. Casini L. (2009). Guida per la valorizzazione della multifunzionalità dell’agricoltura. Firenze: University Press
  10. Carone G., Costello D. (2006). ¿Llega Europa a la tercera edad? Finanzas & Desarrollo, septiembre de 2006 :28-31.
  11. Chapin R., Opal Cox E. (2001). Changing the paradigm: strengths-based and empowerment-oriented social work with frail elders. Gerontological Social Work Practice, Issues, Challenges and Potential, 36 (3/4): 165–179
  12. Ciaperoni A. (2009). Agricoltura e detenzione. Un percorso di futuro. Roma: Editore AIAB.
  13. Cloke P. (2006). Conceptualizing rurality. In Cloke P., Marsden T., Patrick Mooney P., Handbook of Rural Studies: 18-28, London: Sage Pubblication. DOI: 10.4135/9781848608016.n
  14. Corbetta P. (2003). Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. London: Sage Publications.
  15. Henke R. (2007). Tipologie aziendali e politiche di sostegno nell’agricoltura italiana. Rivista dell’Associazione Rossi-Doria, 2: 101-122
  16. Dessein J., Bock B.B. (2010). Socio-cultural processes as breeding ground for Green Care. In Dessein J., Bock B.B (Eds.) The Economics of Green Care in Agriculture: COST Action 866 Green Care in Agriculture: 29–36. Loughborough: University, Loughborough
  17. Di Iacovo F. (2008). Agricoltura sociale: quando le campagne coltivano valori. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  18. Di Iacovo F. (2008). Il riconoscimento delle pratiche di AS in ambito comunitario. In Ciaperoni A., Di Iacovo F., Senni S. Agricoltura sociale. Riconoscimento e validazione delle pratiche inclusive nel welfare locale. Roma: Editore AIAB
  19. Di Iacovo F. (2009). Social farming: charity work, income generation or something else? In Dessein J. Proceedings. of the Community of Practice Farming for Health, Ghent: 55-70. Belgium: ILVO.
  20. Di Iacovo F. (2009). Agricoltura sociale: innovazione multifunzionale nelle aree rurali europee. Agriregioni Europa, 5, 19: 41-45.
  21. Di Iacovo F., O’Connor F.D. (2009). Supporting policies for Social Farming, in Europe. Progressing multifunctionality in responsive rural areas, SoFar Project: Sup-porting EU-agricultural policies. Arsia, Firence, Italy.
  22. Driest P.F. (1997). Care Farms: An Introduction. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn.
  23. Durand G., Van Huylenbroeck G. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: a general framework. In G. Van Huylenbroeck, G. Durand (Eds.). Multifunctional Agriculture: A new Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited: 1-16.
  24. Elings M. (2006). People plant interaction the physiological, psychological and sociological effects of plants on people. In Hassink J., van Dijk M. (eds.). Farming for Health. Netherlands: Springer: 43-55. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4541-7_
  25. Elings M., Hassink J. (2008). Green care farms, a safe community between illness or addiction and the wider society. Journal of therapeutic communities, 29: 310-323
  26. Fine A.H. (2006). Incorporating animal-assisted therapy into psychotherapy: guidelines and suggestions for therapists. In Fine, A.H. (Ed.). Handbook on Animal-assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. Academic San Diego: Press: 167-206
  27. Fisher D.B. (1994). Health care reform based on an empowerment model of recovery by people with psychiatric disabilities. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 45, 9: 913-915
  28. Graybeal C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society, 82, 3: 233-242. DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.23
  29. Hassink J., Grin J., Hulsink W. (2013). Multifunctional Agriculture Meets Health Care: Applying the Multi-Level Transition Sciences Perspective to Care Farming the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis, 53, 2: 223-245. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00579.
  30. Hassink J., Zwartbol Ch., Agricola H.J., Elings M. (2007). Current status and potential of care farms in the Netherlands. NJAS, Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 1: 21-36. DOI: 10.1016/S1573-5214(07)80002-
  31. Haubenhofer K., Elings M., Hassink J., Hine R.E.(2010). The development of Green Care in Western European Countries. Explore, 2: 106-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2009.12.00
  32. Hedberg C., do Carmo R.M. (2012). Translocal Ruralism: Mobility and Connectivity in 527 European Rural Spaces. In Hedberg C., do Carmo R.M. (eds) Translocal Ruralism Mobility and Connectivity in European Rural Spaces. Dordrecht: Springer: 1-9. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2315-
  33. Henke R. (2004). Verso il riconoscimento di una agricoltura multifunzionale. Teorie, politiche, strumenti. Napoli: ESI
  34. Hine R., Peacock J., Pretty J. (2008). Care farming in the UK: contexts, benefits and links with therapeutic communities. Therapeutic Communities, 3: 245-260
  35. Kruger K.A., Serpell J.A. (2006). Animal-assisted interventions in mental health: definitions and theoretical foundations. In Fine A.H. (Ed.) Handbook on Animal-assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. Academic San Diego: Press: 21-38
  36. Niska M.H., Vesala T., Vesala K.M. (2012). Peasantry and Entrepreneurship As Frames for Farming: Reflections on Farmers’ Values and Agricultural Policy Discourses. Sociologia Ruralis, 52, 4: 453-469. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00572.
  37. Noble D.N., Perkins K., Fatout M. (2000). On being a strength coach: child welfare and the strength model. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2: 141-153. DOI: 10.1023/A:100751040726
  38. Mind (2007). Ecotherapy: the green agenda for mental health. London: 2007 week report
  39. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1998). The Environmental Effects of Reforming Agricultural Policies. Paris
  40. Pacciani A. (1992). Società organizzata e istituzioni nello sviluppo rurale. In Basile E., Romano D. (a cura di). Sviluppo rurale, società, territorio, impresa. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 51-71
  41. Potter C., Tilzey M. (2005). Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neo-liberalism, neo-mercantilism and multi-functionality. Progress, Human Geography: 5: 581-600. DOI: 10.1191/0309132505ph569o
  42. Renting H., Rossing W.H.A., Groot J.C.J., Van der Ploeg J.D., Laurent C., Perraud D., Stobbelaar D.J, Van Ittersum M.K. (2009). Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 112-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.01
  43. Resnick S.G., Fontana A., Lehman A.F., Rosenheck R.A. (2004). An empirical conceptualization of the recovery orientation. Schizophrenia Research, 75:119-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.05.00
  44. Rosenberg M., Knox L.M. (2005). The matrix comes to youth violence prevention. A strengths-based, ecologic and development framework. American Journal Preventive Medicine, 29: 185-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.02
  45. Sempik J., Aldridge J., Becker S. (2003). Social and therapeutic horticulture: evidence and messages from research. Thrive with the Centre for Child and Family Research, Loughborough University, Reading
  46. Sempik J., Spurgeon T. (2006). Lessons learnt - evidence from practice: the use of plants and horticulture in promoting health and well-being. In Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Education in Botanic Gardens. Richmond: Botanic Gardens Conservation International in association with Oxford: University of Oxford Botanic Garden.
  47. Senni S. (2005). L’agricoltura sociale come fattore di sviluppo rurale. Agriregionieuropa, 2
  48. Shortall S. (2004). Social or Economic Goals, Civic Inclusion or Exclusion? An Analysis of Rural Development Theory and Practice. Sociologia Ruralis, 44, 1: 109-123. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00265.
  49. Sullivan W.P., Fisher B.J. (1994). Intervening for success: strengths-based case management and successful aging. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 22: 61-74. DOI: 10.1300/J083V22N01_0
  50. Torrey W.C., Rapp C.A., van Tosh L., Mc Nabb C.R.A., Ralph R.O. (2005). Recovery principles and evidence-based practice: essential ingredients of service improvement. Community Mental Health Journal, 42,1: 91-100. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-005-2608-
  51. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). (1992). Agenda 21 - Program of Action for Sustainable Development: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, United Nation Conference on Environment and Development, June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  52. Velazquez B. (2004). Multifunzionalità: definizione, aspetti tecnico-economici e strumenti. In Henke R. (a cura di) Verso il riconoscimento di una agricoltura multifunzionale. Teorie, politiche, strumenti. Napoli: ESI
  53. Velazquez B. (2001). Il concetto di multifunzionalità in agricoltura: una rassegna. La Questione Agraria, 3: 5-113
  54. Woods M. (2009). Rural geography: blurring boundaries and making connections. Progress in Human Geography, 33: 849-58. DOI: 10.1177/030913250810500

Paola de Salvo, Viviana Calzati, Agricoltura sociale e detenzione: l’esperienza della Cooperativa 153 nella casa circondariale Capanne di Perugia in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 109/2016, pp 129-146, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2016-109009