Consumers’ preferences in the estate market: An explorative research on the residential product

Author/s Oronzo Trio, Antonio Iazzi
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/3 Language English
Pages 21 P. 147-167 File size 142 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2017-003009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of this paper is to investigate consumers’ preferences in the real estate industry, especially in the residential field, in order to provide a contribution to the strategic planning and positioning of real estate enterprises. The existing literature highlighted some specific characteristics of the building product and their role in housing choice. This paper explores the house attributes through a qualitative research carried out by the use of some semi-structured interviews in three focus groups and, in a second phase, by the laddering method. We have chosen three categories of potential purchasers according their age: less than 30 years (20-30), between 30 and 40, and over 40. In this way we describe the different paths taken in choosing the ideal home, and the attributes, benefits and values that explain each personality. The discussion contents have been elaborated in order to obtain three different hierarchical value maps, by which the existing links are represented. Common traits in some cases and different characteristics in others emerged, providing interesting insights into the purchasing drivers, the positioning of firms and also some inputs for further analysis.

Keywords: Construction sector, house, housing preferences, building products, values.

  1. Abis M. (2009). La casa degli italiani in tempi di crisi. Micro e Macro Marketing, Vol. 2, pp. 303-308.
  2. Agenzia delle Entrate (2016). Rapporto Immobiliare 2016. Il settore residenziale. -- (
  3. Baldini M. (2010). La casa degli italiani. Bologna: il Mulino.
  4. Barbour R.S., Kitzinger J. (1999). Combining focus groups and interviews: Telling how it is; telling how it feels. In: Barbour R.S. Kitzinger J. (eds). Devoloping Focus Group Research. Sage.
  5. Becker F. (1977). Housing messages. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
  6. Berkoz L., Turk S., and Kellekci M. (2009). Environmental quality and user satisfaction in mass housing areas: the case of Instanbul. European Planning Studies, 17(1): 161, DOI: 10.1080/09654310802514086
  7. Botschen G., and Hemetsberger A. (1998). Diagnosing means-end structures to determine the degree of potential marketing program standardization. Journal of Business Research, 42(2): 151-159, DOI: 10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00116-1
  8. Bourne S. (1989). Il problema della casa. Un approccio geografico. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  9. Bouzarovski S., Haase A., Hall R., Steinfuhrer A., Kabish S., and Odgen P.E. (2010). Urban Geography, Vol. 31, pp. 211-235.
  10. Butera F. (2004). Dalla caverna alla casa ecologica. Storia del comfort e dell’energia. Milano: Edizioni Ambiente.
  11. Castaldo S. and Sabbadin E. (2009). Innovazione e collaborazione nella filiera delle costruzioni. Milano: Edizioni Tecniche Nuove.
  12. Clapham D. (2005). The meaning of housing. A pahtway approach. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  13. Chay K. Y. anc Greenston M. (2005). Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. The Journal of Political Economy, 113: 376-424, DOI: 10.1086/427462
  14. Clark W. and Onaka J. (1983). Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility. Urban Studies, 20: 47-57, DOI: 10.1080/713703176
  15. Clark W.A.V and Dieleman F. S. (1981), Households and Housing. Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market. New Brunswick: Centre for Urban Research Policy.
  16. Coolen H., and Hoekstra J. (2001). Values as determinants of preferences for housing attributes. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 17: 215-236, DOI: 10.1023/A:1012587323814
  17. Cooper C. (1974). The house as symbol of the self. In: Land J. Designing for human behavior. Cambridge: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
  18. Cova B., Mazet F., and Salle R. (1996). Milieu as a Pertinent Unit of Analysis in Project Marketing. International Business Review, 5(6): 647-664.
  19. Cova B., and Hoskins S. (1997). A Twin-Track Networking Approach to Project Marketing. European Management Journal, 15(5): 546-556.
  20. Cova B., Salle R., and Vincent R. (2000). To Bid or Not to Bid: Screening the Whorcop Project. European Management Journal, 18(5): 551-560.
  21. Cova B., Ghauri P. and Salle R. (2002). Project Marketing – Beyond Competitive Bidding. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
  22. Csikszentmihalyi E. R. H. (1981). The meaning of things: domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Dubois A., and Gadde L. E. (2002). The Construction Industry as a Loosely Coupled System: Implication for Productivity and Innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7): 621-631.
  24. Eccles R. (1981). Bureaucratic versus Craft Administration: the Relationship of Market Structure to the Construction Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3): 449-469.
  25. Emea (2016). Residential Market Report. --
  26. Fierro K. P., Fullerton T. M., and Donjuan-Callejo K. E. (2009). Housing attribute preferences in Northern Mexico metropolitan economy. International Atlantic Economic Society, 37: 159-172,
  27. Grassi R. (2015). Antropologia immobiliare. Comportamenti dell’abitare e marketing immobiliare. Lecce: Manni.
  28. Grunert K., and Grunert S. (1995). Measuring subjective meaning structures by laddering method: Theoretical consideration and methodological problems. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12: 209-225, DOI: 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00022-T
  29. Guo J., and Bhat C. (2007). Operationalizing the concept of neighborhood: application to residential location choice analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(1): 95-106,
  30. Gutman I. (1982). A Mens-End Chain Model based on Customer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing, 46, Spring.
  31. Jun M. (2013). The effects of housing preferences for an apartment on residential location choice in Seoul: A random bidding land use simulation approach. Land Use Policy, 35: 395-405,
  32. Karsten L. (2007). Housing as a way of life: towards an understanding of middle-class families’ preference for an urban residential location. Housing Studies, 22: 83-98, DOI: 10.1080/02673030601024630
  33. Kaya N., and Weber M. (2003). Territorial behavior in residence halls: a cross-cultural study. Environment and Behavior, 35(3): 400-414, DOI: 10.1177/0013916503035003005
  34. Kim J., Pagliara F., and Preston J. (2005). The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour. Urban Studies, 42(9): 1621-1636, DOI: 10.1080/00420980500185611
  35. Kim T.-K., Horner M., and Marans R. (2005). Life cycle and environmental factors in selecting residential and job locations. Housing Studies, 20: 457, DOI: 10.1080/02673030500062335
  36. Khoazei F., Hassan A. S., Al Kodmany K., Aarab Y. (2014). Examination of student housing preferences, their similarities and differences. Facilities, 32(11/12): 709-722, DOI: 10.1108/F-08-2012-0061
  37. Koklic M. K., and Vida I. (2011). Consumer strategic decision making and choice process: prefabricated house purchase. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35: 634-643,
  38. Krueger R. (1994). Focus group. A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  39. La Roche C., Flanigan M., and Copeland Jr. P. (2010). Student housing: trends, preferences and needs. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3(10): 45-50.
  40. Levy D., Murphy L., and Lee C. (2008). Influences and emotions: exploring family decision-making processes when buying a house. Housing Studies, 23(2): 271-289, DOI: 10.1080/02673030801893164
  41. Lindberg E., Garling T., Montgomery H., and Waara R. (1987). People’s evaluation of housing attributes. A study of underlying beliefs and values. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 12: 119-137, DOI: 10.1080/02815738708730121
  42. Lundgren B.A. and Lic T. (2010). Customers’ perspectives on a residential development using the laddering method. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 25: 37-52,
  43. Mandiak T., and Veres Z. (1998). The D-U-C Model and the Stages of the Project Marketing Process. 14th IMP Conference, Turku, Finland.
  44. Manzo L. (2003). Beyond house and haven: toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23: 47-61, DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
  45. Marc O. (1994). Psicanalisi della casa. Como: Red.
  46. Mishler E. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  47. Moghimi V., and Jusan M. (2015). Priority of structural housing attribute preferences: identifying customer perception. International Journal of Housing Market and Analysis, 8(1): 36-52.
  48. Moore J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20: 207-218,
  49. Morgan D.L. (1996). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage.
  50. Mulder C. (1996). Housing choice: assumption and approaches. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11: 209.232.
  51. Osman D., and Halime D. (2000). Privacy dimensions: a case study in the interior architecture design studio. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(1): 53-64,
  52. Padel S., and Foster C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attritudes and behaviour. Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal, 107(8): 606-625, DOI: 10.1108/00070700510611002
  53. Pedeliento G. (2012). Project Marketing: A Structurationist Perspective. 28th IMP Conference (Rome).
  54. Pedeliento G., Trio O., and Andreini D. (2012). Il radicamento all’estero delle imprese di costruzioni italiane: analisi teorica ed evidenze empiriche. XXIV Convegno Annuale Sinergie, Lecce.
  55. Pope J. (2008). Fear of crime and housing price. Journal of Urban Economics, 64: 601-614,
  56. Rokeach M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.
  57. Rossi P. (1980). Why families move. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  58. Sabbadin E. (2007). Mercato e distribuzione nell’edilizia. La collaborazione tra industria e commercio in una filiera complessa. Milano: Edizioni Tecniche Nuove.
  59. Saegert S. (1985). The role of housing in the experience of dwelling. In: Altman I., and Werner C., Human Behavior and Environments. Advances in Theory and Research. Vol. 8: Home Environments. New York: Plenum Press.
  60. Sirgy S.G. (2005). Explaining housing preference and choice: the role of selfcongruity and functional congruity. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20: 329-347,
  61. Thomsen J., and Eikemo T. (2010). Aspects of student housing satisfaction: a quantitative study. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25: 273-293,
  62. Tidd J., Bessant J., and Pavitt K. (1999). Management dell’innovazione. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
  63. Vasanen A. (2012). Beyond stated and revealed preferences: the relationship between residential preferences and housing choice in the urban region of Turku, Finland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27: 301-315,
  64. Wu F. (2010). Housing environment preference of young consumers in Guangzhou, China. Property Management, 28(3): 174-192.

Oronzo Trio, Antonio Iazzi, Consumers’ preferences in the estate market: An explorative research on the residential product in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 3/2017, pp 147-167, DOI: 10.3280/MC2017-003009