Are tax incentives determinant and relevant for capitalizing R&D expenditures? Evidence from Europe

Journal title FINANCIAL REPORTING
Author/s Giuseppe Di Martino, Grazia Dicuonzo, Arcangelo Vitelli, Vittorio Dell’Atti
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/2 Language English
Pages 35 P. 63-97 File size 257 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2020-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Using a sample of European listed companies between 2014 and 2017, we ex-a¬mine accounting factors that lead management to capitalize R&D costs, with a specific focus on the tax incentives in the form of government grants. In our analysis, we distinguish between companies which capitalize R&D costs ("capitalizers") and companies which expense R&D costs ("expensers"). The evidence shows that the choice to capitalize R&D costs is positively related to the recognition of grants as revenue. We also investigate the value relevance of tax incentives related to R&D expenditures. Our empirical findings show that investors draw a distinction between government grants associated with research costs (EXP) and those asso-ciated with development costs (CAP). This paper presents both theoretical and practical implications. It contributes to the current debate on expensing or capital-izing R&D costs through a study of tax incentives received by companies for their research activity. Moreover, it offers empirical evidence on the use of R&D cost capitalization for purposes of tax incentives, which can be utilized by standard set-ters to assess opportunistic behaviors adopted by companies.

Keywords: Accounting choices, government grants, R&D expenditures, tax incen-tives, value relevance.

Jel codes: M41, M48

  1. Anagnostopoulou S.C., Ballas A.A. (2014), Tax Incentives as Determinants of Accounting for and Spending on R&D: An International Analysis, working paper.
  2. Aboody D., Lev B. (2000), Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains, Journal of Finance, 55(6), pp. 2747-2766. DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00305
  3. Abrahams T., Baljit K., Sidhu (1998), The Role of R&D Capitalisations in Firm Valuation and Performance Measurement, Australian Journal of Management, 23(2), pp. 169-183. DOI: 10.1177/031289629802300203
  4. Allen F., Carletti E. (2008), Mark-to-market accounting and liquidity pricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2-3), pp. 358-378.
  5. Bagna E., Di Martino G., Rossi D. (2015), No more discount under enhanced fair value hierarchy, Applied Financial Economics (Applied Economics Incoporating Applied Financial Economics), 47(51), pp. 1-24,
  6. Barth M.E., Beaver W.H., Landsman W.R. (1998), Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25, pp. 1-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00017-2
  7. Barth M.E., Kallapur (1996), The Effects of Cross‐Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), pp. 527-567.
  8. Bloom N., Griffith R., Van Reenen J. (2002), Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997, Journal of Public Economics, 85, pp. 1-31. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00086-X
  9. Callimaci A., Landry S. (2004), Market Valuation of Research and Development Spending under Canadian GAAP, Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 3(1), pp. 33-54. DOI: 10.1506/V5LY-4CNE-3J0Q-00HN
  10. Cazavan-Jeny A., Jeanjean T. (2006), The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach, European Accounting Review, 15(1), pp. 37-61. DOI: 10.1080/09638180500510384
  11. Cazavan-Jeny A., Jeanjean T., Joos P. (2011), Accounting choice and future performance: The case of R&D accounting in France, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), pp. 145-165.
  12. Chatterjee S., Hadi A.S. (2012). Regression Analysis by Example. 5th Edition. (New York: Wiley).
  13. Chung K.H., Wright P., Kedia B. (2003), Corporate governance and market valuation of capital and R&D investments, Review of Financial Economics, 12(2), pp. 161-172. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-3300(02)00063-0
  14. Cimini R., Gaetano A., Pagani A. (2014), The relation between R&D accounting treatment and the risk of the firm: Evidence from the Italian market, Financial Reporting, 1, pp. 33-54. DOI: 10.3280/FR2014-001002
  15. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (2014), A Study on R&D Tax Incentives, Working Paper N. 52 – 2014.
  16. Dinh T., Eierle B., Schultze W., Steeger L. (2015), Research and Development, Uncertainty, and Analysts’ Forecasts: The Case of IAS 38, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 26, pp. 257-293.
  17. Di Martino G. (2019), How do Investors perceive Long-term Growth Targets and Forecast Horizons in strategic plans? Evidence from Italian Firms, Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions, 7(2).
  18. Goodwin J., Ahmed K. (2006), Longitudinal Value Relevance of Earnings and Intangible Assets: Evidence from Australian Firms, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15, pp. 72-91.
  19. Hall B.H., Oriani R. (2006), Does the Market Value R&D Investment by European Firms? Evidence from a Panel of Manufacturing Firms in France, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), pp. 971-993.
  20. Hunt A., Moyer S., Shevlin T. (2000), Earnings volatility, earnings management, and equity value. Unpublished working paper, University of Washington.
  21. Klassen K.J., Pittman J.A., Reed M.P. (2004), A Cross-national Comparison of R&D Expenditure Decisions: Tax Incentives and Financial Constraints. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(3), pp. 639-80. DOI: 10.1506/CF2E-HUVC-GAFY-5H56
  22. Kothari S.P., Zimmerman J.L. (1995). Price and return models. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(2), pp. 155-192. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00399-4
  23. Lev B., Sougiannis T. (1996), The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(1), pp. 107-138. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
  24. Lev B., Zarowin P. (1999), The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them, Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), pp. 353-385. DOI: 10.2307/2491413
  25. Lucianetti L., Cocco A., Minunno G. (2011), La rilevazione degli investimenti in R&S e la significatività dell’utile e del capitale netto, Financial Reporting, 3, pp. 45-73. DOI: 10.3280/FR2011-003003
  26. Markarian G., Pozza L., Prencipe A. (2008), Capitalization of R&D costs and earnings management: Evidence from Italian listed companies, The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), pp. 246-267.
  27. Mechelli A. (2013). La Value Relevance del Bilancio d’Esercizio – Modelli, Metodologie di Ricerca ed Evidenze Empiriche. (Torino: Giappichelli).
  28. Mechelli A., Cimini R. (2014), The Value Relevance of Earnings and Book Value Across the EU. A Comparative Analysis, Financial Reporting, 2-3-4, pp. 83-113. DOI: 10.3280/FR2014-002004
  29. Neubig T., Galindo-Rueda F., Appelt S., Criscuolo C., Bajgar M. (2016), Fiscal incentives for R&D and innovation in a diverse world, OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 27. (Paris: OECD Publishing).
  30. Ohlson J.A. (1995), Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation: an empirical perspective, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), pp. 661-687.
  31. Oswald D.R., Simpson A., Zarowin P. (2019), Capitalization vs Expensing and the Behavior of R&D Expenditures, Working Paper.
  32. Oswald D.R. (2008), The Determinants and Value Relevance of the Choice of Accounting for Research and Development Expenditures in the United Kingdom, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(1-2), pp. 1-24.
  33. Oswald D.R., Zarowin, P. (2007), Capitalization of R&D and the Informativeness of Stock Prices, European Accounting Review, 16(4), pp. 703-726. DOI: 10.1080/09638180701706815
  34. Raffournier B. (2013), Has accounting quality increased in Europe after IFRS adoption? Financial Reporting, 2, pp. 71-78. DOI: 10.3280/FR2013-002005
  35. Sahut J.M., Boulerne S., Teulon F. (2011), Do IFRS provide better information about intangibles in Europe?, Review of Accounting and Finance, 10(3), pp. 267-290. DOI: 10.1108/14757701111155798
  36. Shah A.S.Z., Liang S., Akbar S. (2013), International Financial Reporting Standards and the value relevance of R&D expenditures: Pre and post IFRS analysis, International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, pp. 158-169.
  37. Shackelford D.A., Shevlin T. (2001), Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, pp. 321-387.
  38. Wang S., D’Souza J.M. (2006), Earnings Management: The Effect of Accounting Flexibility on R&D Investment Choices, Working Paper.
  39. Watts R.L., Zimmerman J.L. (1986), Positive Accounting Theory (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
  40. White H. (1980), A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48(4), pp. 817-838. DOI: 10.2307/1912934
  41. Zhao R. (2002), Relative Value Relevance of R&D Reporting: An International Comparison, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 13(2), pp. 153-174. DOI: 10.1111/1467-646X.00082

Giuseppe Di Martino, Grazia Dicuonzo, Arcangelo Vitelli, Vittorio Dell’Atti, Are tax incentives determinant and relevant for capitalizing R&D expenditures? Evidence from Europe in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 2/2020, pp 63-97, DOI: 10.3280/FR2020-002003