Economic characterization of irrigated and livestock farms in The Po River Basin District

Titolo Rivista Economia agro-alimentare
Autori/Curatori Veronica Manganiello, Alessandro Banterle, Gabriele Canali, Geremia Gios, Giacomo Branca, Sofia Galeotti, Fabrizio De Filippis, Raffaella Zucaro
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2021/3 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 0 P. 1-24 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ecag2021oa12773
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This article highlights the potential for collecting and processing territorial data in order to facilitate planning and programming that respond to real local problems and include the political and regulatory framework in force. A case study is explored that involves the joint use of two databases with institutional functions: the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) and the National Information System for Water Management in Agriculture (SIGRIAN). Both databases are managed by the Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA). Those data were used to calculate economic-structural indicators for irrigated and livestock farms located in the Po River Basin District and to run the socioeconomic analysis required to update the Water Management Plan. The updating of plans is governed by the Water Framework Directive (Directive 2000/60/EC), which establishes the community framework for water and requires all Member States to review and update their Plan every six years. The first update deadline was December 2015 and the second one will be December 2021. The integrated use of two databases made it possible to identify farms according to two types of irrigation: collective or self-supplied. With collective irrigation (Irrigation Water Service), the farm is a user of a Local Agency for Water Management (LAWM) that collects and distributes irrigation water. With self-supplied irrigation, the individual farmers collect and distribute water themself. The analysis carried out demonstrates the need and opportunity to develop coordinated data collection and management systems, thereby strengthening and refining the monitoring and programming of water use in line with the real needs of the territory.

Keywords:Irrigation; FADN; SIGRIAN; Water Management Plan; Socio-Economic Analysis

  1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5, p. 563). Washington, D.C.: Island press.
  2. Adhikari, K. & Hartemink, A.E. (2016). Linking soils to ecosystem services – A global review. Geoderma, 262, 101-111.
  3. Bellver-Domingo, A., Hernández-Sancho, F. & Molinos-Senante, M. (2016). A review of Payment for Ecosystem Services for the economic internalization of environmental externalities: A water perspective. Geoforum, 70, 115-118, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.018.
  4. Benedetti, I., Branca, G. & Zucaro, R. (2019). Evaluating input use efficiency in agriculture through a stochastic frontier production: An application on a case study in Apulia (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117609, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117609.
  5. CREA (2021). L’agricoltura italiana conta 2020. CREA Centro Politiche e Bioeconomia. Roma.
  6. Columba, P. & Altamore, L. (2006). Irrigazione e sviluppo agricolo: evoluzione dell’uso dell’acqua ed effetti sul valore del prodotto. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 3, 452-454.
  7. Direttiva 2000/60/CE del Parlamento Europeo e del Consiglio. 23 ottobre 2000.
  8. D.M. Mipaaf 31 luglio (2015). Approvazione delle linee guida per la regolamentazione da parte delle Regioni delle modalità di quantificazione dei volumi idrici ad uso irriguo.
  9. Dominati, E., Patterson, M. & Mackay, A. (2010). A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological economics, 69(9), 1858-1868, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002.
  10. Dono G. & Severini S. (2006). Il recupero del costo pieno nella Direttiva Quadro delle Acque: problemi per l’agricoltura italiana. Agriregionieuropa, 2(7).
  11. FAO (2011). Climate change, water and food security. Water report nr. 36. Rome. -- www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2096e/i2096e.pdf.
  12. FAO (2012). Coping with water scarcity. An action framework for agriculture and food security. Water Report Nr. 38. Rome. -- www.fao.org/docrep/016/i3015e/i3015e.pdf.
  13. FAO (2017). Water for sustainable food and agriculture. Rome. -- www.fao.org/3/a-i7959e.pdf.
  14. FAO (2019). The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture, J. Bélanger & D. Pilling (eds.). FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments, 572. Roma. -- (www.fao.org/3/CA3129EN/CA3129EN.pdf) Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  15. Gallerani, V. & Viaggi, D. (2006). Il valore dell’acqua per il territorio e l’ambiente rurale. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 3, 569-576.
  16. INEA (2009). Uso del suolo e stima dei fabbisogni irrigui nelle aree non servite da reti collettive dei consorzi di bonifica nelle regioni meridionali. Rapporto Irrigazione.
  17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ipcc (2014). Climate Change 2014 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Part B: Regional Aspects: Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415386.
  18. Jandl, R. (2010). Il carbonio del suolo. Agriregionieuropa, 6(21).
  19. Martin-Ortega, J., Ferrier, R.C., Gordon, I.J. & Khan, S. (2015). Water ecosystem services: a global perspective. UNESCO Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316178904.
  20. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della tutela del territorio e del mare (MATTM), Manuale operativo e metodologico per l’implementazione dell’analisi economica, Decreto Direttoriale n. 574/sta del 6 dicembre 2018.
  21. Natali, F. & Branca, G. (2020). On positive externalities from irrigated agriculture and their policy implications: An overview. Economia Agro-Alimentare/Food Economy, 22(2), 1-25, DOI: 10.3280/ecag2-2020oa10412.
  22. Peter, M., Edwards, P.J., Jeanneret, P., Kampmann, D. & Luscher, A. (2008). Changes over three decades in the floristic composition of fertile permanent grasslands in the Swiss Alps. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 125(1-4), 204-212, DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.002.
  23. United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Draft resolution referred to the United Nations summit for the adoption of the post-2015 development agenda by the General Assembly at its sixty-ninth session. UN Doc. A/70/L.1 of 18 September 2015.
  24. Van der Meulen, S. & Maring, L. (2018). Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Soil ecosystems. SOILS4EU/DGENV.

  • Do Irrigation Water Requirements Affect Crops’ Economic Values? Paolo Scatolini, Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro, Francesco Cavazza, Raffaella Zucaro, in Water /2023 pp.77
    DOI: 10.3390/w16010077

Veronica Manganiello, Alessandro Banterle, Gabriele Canali, Geremia Gios, Giacomo Branca, Sofia Galeotti, Fabrizio De Filippis, Raffaella Zucaro, Economic characterization of irrigated and livestock farms in The Po River Basin District in "Economia agro-alimentare" 3/2021, pp 1-24, DOI: 10.3280/ecag2021oa12773