Progress in psychoanalysis

Author/s Morris N. Eagle
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/3 Language Italian
Pages 24 P. 359-382 File size 227 KB
DOI 10.3280/PU2018-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The question of progress in psychoanalytic theorizing is analyzed through a discussion of pluralism (i.e., the existence of different psychoanalytic "schools"), of the nature of training and education in psychoanalytic institutes, and of the claim of a "common ground" in certain areas despite theoretical differences. It is argued that progress requires theoretical integration among different psychoanalytic "schools" and shifts in prevailing attitudes in regard to training and education. The need for critical thinking and openness to relevant empirical findings from other disciplines is also emphasized. The question of progress in psychoanalysis is linked to the future of psychoanalysis conceived not only as the future of the profession but also, and more importantly, of a theory of mental functioning.

Keywords: Pluralism; Common ground; Theoretical progress; Integration; Psychoanalytic education

  1. Abrams S., Appy G., Aslan C.M., Goldberg A., Le Guen C. & Portella Nunes E. (1989). Pre-published statements for the 36th International Psychoanalytical Congress in Rome, 30 July to 4 August 1989. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70, 1: 3-28.
  2. Axelrod S., Naso R. & Rosenberg L., editors (2018). Progress in Psychoanalysis: Envisioning the Future of the Profession. London: Routledge.
  3. Bowlby J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. London: Hogarth Press (2nd edition: New York: Basic Books, 1982) (trad. it.: Attaccamento e perdita. Vol. 1: L’attaccamento alla madre. Torino: Boringhieri, 1972 [1a ediz.], 1989 [2a ediz.]).
  4. Chambless D.L. & Ollendick T.H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 685-716.
  5. Clarkin J.F., Yeomans F. & Kernberg O.F. (1999). Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality. New York: Wiley (trad. it.: Psicoterapia delle personalità borderline. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2000). Edizione su Internet delle pp. 31-39 del cap. 1: Strategie nella psicoterapia delle personalità borderline:
  6. Clarkin J.F., Yeomans F. & Kernberg O.F. (2006). Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality. Focusing on Object Relations. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing (trad. it.: Psicoterapia psicodinamica dei disturbi di personalità: un approccio basato sulle relazioni oggettuali. Manuale della psicoterapia focalizzata sul transfert (TFP). Roma: Fioriti, 2011).
  7. Connolly M.B., Crits-Cristoph P., Shappell S., Barber J.P., Luborsky L. & Shaffer C. (1999). Relation of transference interpretations to outcome in the early sessions of brief supportive-expressive therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 9, 4: 485-495. DOI: 10.1080/10503309912331332881
  8. Cooper A.M. (2008). American psychoanalysis today: A plurality of orthodoxies. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 36, 2: 235-253.
  9. Coppleston S.J.F. (1963). A History of Philosophy, Volume 4. Modern Philosophy: Descartes & Leibniz. Garden City, NY: Image Books, Doubleday & Co.
  10. Eagle M.N. (1984). Psychoanalysis and “narrative truth”: A reply to Spence. Psychoanalytic and Contemporary Thought, 7, 4: 629-640. di Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane”, Bologna, 20-5-1989: Cambiamenti clinici e teorici in psicoanalisi: dai conflitti ai deficit e dai desideri ai bisogni. Psicoterapia e scienze umane, 1991, XXV, 1: 33-46. Edizione su Internet: --
  11. Eagle M.N. (1987). Theoretical and clinical shifts in psychoanalysis. American Journal of Or-thopsychiatry, 57, 2: 175-185. Una versione presentata ai “Seminari internazionali Dibattito con Pier Francesco Galli dopo il seminario tenuto dall’autore a Bologna il 20-5-1989: --
  12. Eagle M.N. (1992). La natura del cambiamento teorico in psicoanalisi. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XXVI, 3: 5-33. Trad. inglese: The dynamics of theory change in psychoanalysis. In: Earman J., Janis A., Massey G. & Rescher N., editors, Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, 1993, pp. 373-408.
  13. Eagle M.N. (2018a). Core Concepts in Classical Psychoanalysis. Clinical, Research Evidence and Conceptual Critique. New York: Routledge.
  14. Eagle M.N. (2018b). Core Concepts in Contemporary Psychoanalysis. Clinical, Research Evidence and Conceptual Critique. New York: Routledge (trad. it. di una bozza del cap. 2: Il controtransfert rivisitato. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 2015, XLIX, 4: 535-572. DOI: 10.3280/PU2015-004001)
  15. Eagle M.N. & Wolitzky D.L. (1989). The idea of progress in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 12, 1: 27-72.
  16. Eagle M.N. & Wolitzky D.L. (2011). Systematic empirical research versus clinical case studies: A valid antagonism? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59, 4: 791-818. DOI: 10.1177/0003065111416652
  17. Fairbairn W.R.D. (1952). Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Tavistock (trad. it.: Studi psicoanalitici sulla personalità. Torino: Boringhieri, 1970, 1992).
  18. Freud S. (1914). Per la storia del movimento psicoanalitico. Opere, 7: 377-438. Torino: Boringhieri, 1975.
  19. Freud S. (1915-17). Introduzione alla psicoanalisi. Lezione 28: La terapia analitica. Opere, 8: 597-611. Torino: Boringhieri, 1976.
  20. Freud S. (1922 [1923]). Due voci di enciclopedia: “Psicoanalisi” e “Teoria della libido”. 1. Psicoanalisi. Opere, 9: 439-457. Torino: Boringhieri, 1977.
  21. Freud S. (1927). Poscritto del 1927 [a “Il problema dell’analisi condotta da non medici. Conversazione con un interlocutore imparziale” (1926). Opere, 10: 347-415]. Opere, 10: 416-423. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978.
  22. Gabbard G.O. (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76, 3: 475-485.
  23. Gedo J.E. (1979). Beyond Interpretation. Towards a Revised Theory for Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press (Revised Edition: Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1993) (trad. it.: Al di là dell’interpretazione. Una nuova teoria della tecnica psicoanalitica. Roma: Astrolabio, 1986).
  24. Geha R. (1984). On psychoanalytic history and the “real” story of fictionary lives. International Forum for Psychoanalysis, 1: 221-291.
  25. Gill M.M. (1994). Psychoanalysis in Transition: A Personal View. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (trad. it.: Psicoanalisi in transizione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1996).
  26. Glover E. (1952). Research methods in psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 33, 4: 403-409.
  27. Glover E. (1955). The Technique of Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press (trad. it.: La tecnica della psicoanalisi. Roma: Astrolabio, 1971).
  28. Greenberg J.R. & Mitchell S.A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (trad. it.: Le relazioni oggettuali nella teoria psicoanalitica. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1986).
  29. Harlow H.F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 2: 673-685.
  30. Harlow H. F. (1960). Primary affectional patterns in primates. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 30, 4: 676-684.
  31. Hoffman I.Z. (2007). Doublethinking our way to “scientific” legitimacy: The desiccation of human experience (Relazione plenaria al Congresso Annuale dell’American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, 19 gennaio 2007). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2009, 57, 5: 1043-1069. DOI: 10.1177/0003065109343925
  32. Høglend P. (1993). Transference interpretations and long-term change after dynamic psychotherapy of brief to moderate length. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 47, 4: 494-507.
  33. Høglend P. (1996). Analysis of transference in patients with personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10, 2: 122-131.
  34. Høglend P., Amlo S., Marble A., Bogwald K.P., Sjaastad M.C. & Heyerdahl O. (2006). Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: An experimental study of transference interpretations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 10: 1739-1746.
  35. Høglend P., Johansson P.J., Marble A., Bogwold K.P. & Amlo S. (2007). Moderators of the effects of transference interpretations in brief dynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 2: 160-171. DOI: 10.1080/10503300701194206
  36. Høglend P., Bogwals K.P., Amlo S., Marble A., Ulberg R., Sjaastad M.C., Sørbye Ø., Heyerdahl O. & Johansson P. (2008). Transference interpretations in dynamic psychotherapy: Do they really yields sustained effects? American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 6: 763-771.
  37. Høglend P., Hersoug A.G., Bogwald K.P., Amlo S., Marble A., Sørbye Ø., Røssberg J.I., Ulberg R., Gabbard G.O. & Crits-Christoph P. (2011). Effects of transference work in the context of therapeutic alliance and quality of object relations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 5: 697-706.
  38. Holzman P.S. (1976). The future of psychoanalysis and its institutes. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65, 2: 250-273.
  39. Holzman P.S. (1985). Psychoanalysis: Is the therapy destroying the science? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33, 4: 725-770. DOI: 10.1177/000306518503300401
  40. Johansson P., Høglend P., Ulberg R., Amlo S., Marble A., Bogwald K., Sørbye O., Sjaastad M.C. & Heyerdahl O. (2010). The mediating role of insight for long-term improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 3: 438-448.
  41. Jurist E. (2018). A defense of strong pluralism in psychoanalysis: Mentalizing the hermeneutic-science debate. In: Axelrod, Naso & Rosenberg, 2018, cap. 1, pp. 17-35.
  42. Kant I. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: J.F. Hartknoch (trad. it.: Critica della ragion pura. Bari: Laterza, 1910).
  43. Kernberg O.F. (1993). Convergences and divergences in contemporary psychoanalytic technique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 4: 659-673.
  44. Kernberg O.F. (1996). Thirty methods to destroy the creativity of psychoanalytic candidates. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 5: 1031-1040 (trad. it.: Trenta metodi per di-struggere la creatività dei candidati in psicoanalisi. Gli argonauti, 1998, 76: 1-14. Anche in: Le relazioni nei gruppi. Ideologia, conflitto, leadership [1998]. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1999, cap. 14. Internet: --
  45. Kernberg O.F. (2012). Suicide prevention for psychoanalytic institutes and societies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 60, 4: 707-719.
  46. Kernberg O.F., Burnstein E., Coyne L., Appelbaum A., Horowitz L. & Voth H. (1972). Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: Final report of the Menninger Foundation’s Psychotherapy Research Project. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 36, 1/2: 1-275.
  47. Kirsner D. (2000). Unfree Associations: Inside Psychoanalytic Institutes. London: Process Press. Edizione su Internet: --
  48. Kitcher P. (1992). Freud’s Dream: A Complete Interdisciplinary Science of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  49. Kohut H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self. A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. New York: International Universities Press (trad. it.: Narcisismo e analisi del Sé. Torino: Boringhieri, 1976).
  50. Kohut H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities Press (trad. it.: La guarigione del Sé. Torino: Boringhieri, 1980).
  51. Kohut H. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (trad. it.: La cura psicoanalitica. Torino: Boringhieri, 1986).
  52. Lichtenstein D. (2018). Multiplicity and rigor in psychoanalysis. In: Axelrod, Naso & Rosenberg, 2018, cap. 4, pp. 78-97.
  53. Luborsky L., Graff H., Pulver S. & Curtis A. (1973). A clinical-quantitative examination of consensus on the concept of transference. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 1: 69-75.
  54. Migone P. (1985). Monografia: John E. Gedo. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XIX, 4: 89-102.
  55. Migone P. (1991). La differenza tra psicoanalisi e psicoterapia: panorama storico del dibattito e recente posizione di Merton M. Gill. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XXV, 4: 35-65 (una versione su Internet:
  56. Mosher P.H. & Richards A. (2005). The history of membership and certification in the APsaA: Old demons, new debates. Psychoanalytic Review, 92, 6: 865-894.
  57. Nagel T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press (trad. it.: Uno sguardo da nessun luogo. Milano: Il Saggiatore, 1988).
  58. Ogden T.H. (1997). Reverie and interpretation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 66, 4: 567-595.
  59. Ogden T.H. (2015). Intuiting the truth of what’s happening: On Bion’s notes on memory and desire. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 84, 2: 285-306.
  60. Ogrodniczuk J.S. & Piper W.E. (1999). Use of transference interpretations in dynamically oriented individual psychotherapy with patients with personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13, 4: 297-311.
  61. Ogrodniczuk J.S., Piper W.E., Joyce J.S. & McCallum M. (1999). Transference interpretations in short-term dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 187, 9: 571-578. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199909000-00007
  62. Piaget J. (1937). La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel, F: Delachaux et Niestlé (trad. it.: La costruzione del reale nel bambino. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1979).
  63. Pine F. (1985). Developmental Theory and Clinical Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (trad. it.: Teoria evolutiva e processo clinico. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1995).
  64. Pine F. (1988). The four psychologies of psychoanalysis and their place in clinical work. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36, 3: 571-596.
  65. Pine F. (1990). Drive, Ego, Object, and Self. A Synthesis For Clinical Work. New York: Basic Books.
  66. Piper W.E., Azim H.F.A., Joyce A.S. & McCallum M. (1991). Transference interpretations, therapeutic alliance, and outcome in short-term individual therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 10: 946-953.
  67. Richards A. (2015). Psychoanalysis in crisis: The danger of ideology. Psychoanalytic Review, 102, 3: 389-405.
  68. Richards A. (2017). From favorite to persona non-grata: A psychoanalytic journey. Journal of Psychohistory, 45, 2: 135-139.
  69. Ryum T., Stiles T.C., Svartberg M. & McCullough L. (2010). The role of transference work: The therapeutic alliance and their interaction in reducing interpersonal problems among psychotherapy patients with cluster C personality disorders. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47, 4: 442-453.
  70. Schafer R. (1980). Narrative Actions in Psychoanalysis (Heinz Werner Lecture Series, 14). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press, 1981.
  71. Schafer R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books (trad. it.: L’atteggiamento analitico. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1984).
  72. Schafer R. (1992). Retelling a Life. Narration and Dialogue in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books (trad. it.: Rinarrare una vita. Narrazione e dialogo in psicoanalisi. Roma: Fioriti, 1999).
  73. Schafer R. (1990). The search for common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 1: 49-52.
  74. Schlick M. (1918). Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre. Berlin: Springer (trad. it.: Teoria generale della conoscenza. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 1986).
  75. Spence D.P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth. Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton (trad. it.: Verità narrativa e verità storica. Firenze: Martinelli, 1987).
  76. Wachtel P. (2018). What must we transcend to make progress in psychoanalysis? Tribal boundaries, the default position, and the self-defeating quest for purity. In: Axelrod, Naso & Rosenberg, 2018, cap. 2, pp. 36-55.
  77. Wallerstein R.S. (1986). Forty-two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psycho-therapy. New York: Guilford.
  78. Wallerstein R.S. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69, 1: 5-21 (trad. it.: Una o molte psicoanalisi? Gli Argonauti, 1989, XI, 43: 253-276).
  79. Wallerstein R.S. (1989). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1990, 71, 1: 3-20 (Relazione al 36° Congresso dell’International Psychoanalytical Association [IPA], Roma, 30 luglio - 4 agosto 1989). Anche in: Wallerstein R.S., editor, The Common Ground of Psychoanalysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, 1992, pp. 201-242.
  80. Wallerstein R.S. (2005). Will psychoanalytic pluralism be an enduring state of our discipline? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 3: 623-626. DOI: 10.1516/VJHB-7R8A-162R-B5WN
  81. Westen D., Morrison Novotny K. & Thompson-Brenner H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 4: 631-663.

Morris N. Eagle, Il progresso in psicoanalisi in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2018, pp 359-382, DOI: 10.3280/PU2018-003002