Limbiate: from the undifferentiated conditions of the ‘corea’ to the discovery of new centres,

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Pier Luigi Paolillo
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/66 Language Italian
Pages 11 P. 81-91 File size 1010 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2013-066017
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The ‘corea’ of Limbiate was a self built-entity, with no plan, that arose in the post-war years and housed 9,000 immigrants in structures which over the years became part of the urban fabric to the extent that today it is difficult to distinguish them from the rest of the urban build. It was an anticipation of the unbounded ‘corea’ of the Brianza today where you almost never see elements of discontinuity between the towns and villages and the particular features of municipalities have been obliterated by the amoeba like configuration of the Lombard uplands. However, are they still the ‘coree’, the same undifferentiated magma of 60 years ago, or can the plan trace the new latent ‘centres’? Even if here the process of diffusion has standardised the blocks of buildings eliminating the infrastructural hierarchy and the clearly discernible centralities, tools like ‘network community’, ‘space syntax’ and ‘multiple centrality assessment’ can nevertheless assist.

Keywords: Diffusion process; new centralities; configuration analysis

  1. Alasia F. e Montaldi D, 1960, Milano Corea. Inchiesta sugli immigrati, Feltrinelli, Milano.
  2. Andemberg M., 1973, Cluster Analysis for Applications, New York Academic Press.
  3. Batty M., 2005, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent – Base Models, and Fractals, The Mit Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  4. Batty M. and Xie Y., 1997, Modeling Urban Dynamics Through Gis – Based Cellular Automata,
  5. Batty M., Claramount C. and Jiang B., 1999, Geometric Accessibility and Geographic Information: Extending Desktop Gis to Space Syntax,
  6. Batty M. and Rana S., 2002, Reformulating Space Syntax: The Automatic Definition and Generation of Axial Lines and Axial Maps,
  7. Bavelas A., 1948, «A Mathematical Model for Group Structures», Human Organization, n. 7, pp. 16-30.
  8. Bavelas A., 1950, «Communication Patterns in Task Oriented Groups», Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, n. 22, pp. 271-282.
  9. Benzécri J.P., 1973, L’analyse des données. Analyse des correspondances, Dunod, Paris.
  10. Borachia V. e Paolillo P.L., 1993, a cura di, Territorio sistema complesso. Una valutazione critica delle variabili informative per una conoscenza delle risorse fisiche nel sistema territoriale urbano/agricolo, Franco-Angeli, Milano.
  11. Cardillo A., Scellato S., Latora V. and Porta S., 2006, «Structural Properties of Planar Graphs of Urban Street Patterns», Physical Review E, Journal of the American Physical Society, vol. 73, n. 6.
  12. Coppi R. e Bolasco S., 1989, Analysis of Multiway Data Matrices, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  13. Crucitti P., Latora V. and Porta S., 2006, «Centrality Measures in Spatial Networks of Urban Streets», Physical Review E, Journal of the American Physical Society, vol. 73, n. 3.
  14. Cutini V., 2010, La rivincita dello spazio urbano. L’approccio configurazionale allo studio e all’analisi dei centri abitati, Plus Pisa U.Press, Pisa.
  15. Cutini V., Petri M. e Santucci A., 2004, Mark Point Parameter Analysis (MaPPa): metodo Gis di analisi configurazionale», in VII conferenza nazionale degli utenti Esri, Roma.
  16. Dalton N., Peponis J. and Dalton R., 2003, To Tarne a Tiger one has to Know its Nature: Extending Weighted Angular Integration Analysis to the Description of Gis Road Centreline Data for Large Scale Urban Analysis, in Proceedings 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London.
  17. De Arruda Campos M.B., 2003, A Proposed Methodology to Normalise Total Depth Values When Applying the Visibility Graph Analysis, in
  18. Diday et al., 1994, New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis, Springer Verlag, New York, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2
  19. Dursun P., 2007, Space Syntax in Architectural Design,
  20. Escoufier Y., 1973, «Le traitement des variables vectorielles», Biometrics, vol. 29, DOI: 10.2307/2529140
  21. Fabbris L., 1997, Statistica multivariata. Analisi esplorativa dei dati, McGraw Hill, Milano.
  22. Fraire M., 1994, Metodi di analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Aspetti statistici e applicazioni informatiche, Cisu, Roma.
  23. Freeman L.C., 1977, «A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness », Social Networks.
  24. Freeman L.C., 1979, «Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification », Social Networks.
  25. Glacon F., 1981, Analyse conjointe de plusieurs matrices de données, Usm, Grenoble.
  26. Griguolo S., 2008, Addati. Un pacchetto per l’analisi esplorativa dei dati – Guida all’uso, Iuav, Venezia.
  27. Hillier B., 2007, «Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture», Space Syntax, London.
  28. Hillier B. and Hanson J., 1984, The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511597237
  29. Hillier B., Hanson J. and Peponis J., 1987, «The Syntactic Analysis of Settlements», Architecture and Behaviour, vol. 3, pp. 217-231.
  30. Hillier B., Penn A., Hanson J., Grajewski T. and Xu J., 1993, «Natural Movement or Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement », Environmental planning B, vol. 20, pp. 29-66.
  31. Kim J.O. and Mueller C.W., 1978, Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Sage Pubblications, London.
  32. Lavit C., 1988, Analyse conjointe de tableaux quantitatifs, Masson, Paris.
  33. Law H.G., Snyder J., Hattie J.A and McDonald R.P., 1984, Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis, Preager, New York.
  34. Lombardo S. and Petri M., 2007, «The Simulation of Spatial Change: What Relation Between Knowledge and Modelling? A Proposal and its Application», in Albeverio S., Andrey D., Giordano P. and Vancheri A. (eds.), The Dynamics of Complex Urban Systems. An Interdisciplinary Approach, Physica Verlag Heidelberg, New York, pp. 335-356.
  35. Magnaghi A., Perelli A., Sarfatti R. e Stevan C., 1970, La città fabbrica, Clup, Milano.
  36. Margalef R., 1958, «Information Theory in Ecology», Gen. Syst., vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 36-37.
  37. Matthews J.A., 1981, Metodologia statistica per la ricerca geografica, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  38. Matthews A., 1979, «Standardization of Measures Prior to Clustering», Biometrics, vol. 35, p. 892.
  39. Morrison D.F., 1976, Multivariate Statistical Method, McGraw Hill, New York.
  40. Palermo P.C. e Griguolo S., 1984, a cura di, Nuovi problemi e nuovi metodi di analisi territoriale, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  41. Paolillo P.L., 2010, L’innovazione della carta dell’intervenibilità nell’esperienza dei capoluoghi lombardi di Como e Sondrio, relazione in Cd, XXXI Conferenza scientifica annuale Aisre, Aosta, 20-22 settembre, pp. 1-10.
  42. Paolillo P.L. with Benedetti A., Baresi U., Terlizzi L. and Graj G., 2011, «An Assessment – Based Process for Modifying the Built Fabric of Historic Centres: The Case of Como in Lombardy», in Murgante B. et al. (eds.), Iccsa 2011, Part I, Lecture notes in Computer Science, 6782, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 162-176.
  43. Paolillo P.L., 2011, a cura di, Il piano di governo del territorio di Como. Materiali di ricerca, Maggioli, Rimini, pp. 427 (con cd).
  44. Paolillo P.L. con Baresi U. e Bisceglie R., 2012a, Il riconoscimento dei valori spaziali dell’assetto extraurbano nell’esperienza del capoluogo lombardo di Cremona, relazione in Cd, XXXIII Conferenza scientifica annuale AIsre, Facoltà di Economia, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, 13-15 settembre, pp. 1-10.
  45. Paolillo P.L. with Baresi U. and Bisceglie R., 2012b, «Cartographic Circuits Inside Gis Environment for the Construction of the Landscape Sensitivity Map in the Case of Cremona», in Murgante B. et al. (eds.), Iccsa 2012, Lecture notes in Computer Science, Springer, Heidelberg.
  46. Penn A. et al., 1995, Configurational Modelling of Urban Movement Networks, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, London.
  47. Pielou E.C., 1969, An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, Wiley Interscience, New York.
  48. Porta S. e Latora V., 2006, «Multiple Centrality Assessment. Centralità e ordine complesso nell’analisi spaziale e nel progetto urbano», Territorio, n. 39, pp. 189-202.
  49. Porta S., Crucitti P. and Latora V., 2006, «The Network Analysis of Urban Streets: a Dual Approach», Physical A, Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 369, n. 2.
  50. Racine J.B. e Reymond H., 1983, L’analisi quantitativa in geografia, Marsilio, Venezia.
  51. Sabidussi G, 1966, «The Centrality Index of a Graph», Psychometrika, n. 31, pp. 581-603, DOI: 10.1007/BF02289527
  52. Scellato S., Cardillo A., Latora V. and Porta S., 2006, «The Backbone of a City», The European Physical Journal B, vol. 50, n. 1-2, DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00066-4
  53. Silverman B.W., 1986, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman & Hall, London.
  54. Silvestri L. and Hill I.R., 1964, «Some Problems of the Taxometric Approach », in Heywood V.H. and McNeil J. (eds.), Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification, Systematic Association, London.
  55. Stevens J., 1986, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
  56. Teklenburg J.A.F, Timmermans H.J.P. and van Wagenberg A.F., 1993, «Space Syntax: Standardized Integration Measures and Some Simulations », Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 20, pp. 347-357, DOI: 10.1068/b200347
  57. Turner A., 2001, Depthmap: A Program to Perform Visibility Graph Analysis Centrality Assessment, in 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Georgia Institute of Technology, 7-11 May.
  58. Turner, A., 2004, Depthmap 4 – A Researcher’s Handbook, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, Ucl, London (
  59. Turner A. and Penn A., 1999, Making Isovists Syntactic: Isovist Integration Analysis, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Universidad de Brasil, Brasilia.
  60. Turner A., Doxa M., O’Sullivan D. and Penn A., 2001, «From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space», Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 28, pp. 103-121, DOI: 10.1068/b268
  61. Watts D.J. and Strogatz S.H., 1998, «Collective Dynamics of Small – World Networks», Nature, n. 393.

  • Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2015 Pier Luigi Paolillo, Umberto Baresi, pp.440 (ISBN:978-3-319-21469-6)
  • Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014 Pier Luigi Paolillo, Massimo Rossati, Mattia Andrea Rudini, pp.125 (ISBN:978-3-319-09146-4)

Pier Luigi Paolillo, Limbiate: dalla condizione indifferenziata di «corea» alla scoperta delle nuove centralità in "TERRITORIO" 66/2013, pp 81-91, DOI: 10.3280/TR2013-066017