70 Years’ Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective

Author/s Ernest R. Alexander
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/1
Language English Pages 14 P. 5-18 File size 125 KB
DOI 10.3280/SCRE2015-001001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This survey, a subjective critical review of ‘planning theory’ as it evolved since the mid- 20th century, has three parts. The first is a condensed account of the emergence of three distinct schools of thought: the radical-communicative, post-structuralist, and institutionalist streams. In the second part each stream is represented reviewing a typical book: Friedmann’s (2011) Insurgencies, Gunder and Hillier’s (2009) Planning in Ten Words or Less, and Webster and Lai’s (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets. The last part argues the author’s position - there is no ‘planning’, only diverse planning practices - and develops its implications for planning theory and practice.

Keywords: Planning theory; communicative planning; post-structuralist planning.

  1. Adams D. and Tiesdell S., 2010, «Planners as Market Actors: Rethinking Statemarket Relations in Land and Property». Planning Theory & Practice, 2, 11: 187-207. DOI: 10.1080/14649351003759631
  2. Alexander E.R., 1982, «If Planning isn’t Everything, Maybe it’s Something». Town Planning Review, 52, 2: 131-142.
  3. Alexander E. R., 1987, «Planning as Development Control: Is that all Urban Planning is for?». Town Planning Review, 58, 4: 453-467.
  4. Alexander E.R., 1992, Approaches to Planning: Introducing current planning theories, concepts and issues. Montreaux: Gordon & Breach.
  5. Alexander E.R., 1995, How Organizations Act Together: Interorganizational Coordination in Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
  6. Alexander E.R., 1998, «Doing the Impossible: Notes for a General Theory of Planning ». Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 5: 667-680.
  7. Alexander E.R., 2001, «A Transaction-cost Theory of Land Use Planning and Development Control». Town Planning Review, 72, 1: 45-76.
  8. Alexander E.R., 2004, «Book Review: Webster and Lai (2003) Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities». Planning Theory, 3, 2:
  9. 173-179. DOI: 10.1177/1473095204044780.AlexanderE.R.,2005,«WhatdoPlannersNeedtoKnow?IdentifyingNeede
  10. Competencies, Methods and Skills». Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22, 2: 91-106.
  11. Alexander E.R., 2006, «Institutional Design for Sustainable Development». Town Planning Review, 77, 1: 1-28. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.77.1.2
  12. Alexander E.R., 2010, «Introduction: Does Planning Theory Affect Practice, and if so, How?». Planning Theory, 9, 2: 99-107. DOI: 10.1177/1473095209357862
  13. Alexander E.R., 2011, «Book Review: Gunder and Hillier (2009) Planning in Ten Words or Less». Planning Theory, 10, 4: 379-382. DOI: 10.1177/1473095211401731
  14. Alexander E.R., 2013a, «Book Review: Friedmann (2011) Insurgencies». Planning Theory, 12, 1: 104-106. DOI: 10.1177/1473095264862597
  15. Alexander E.R., 2013b, Forbidden Fruit? – The Expert Planner: A Post-postmodernist Take on Planners in Spatial Planning and Development Control. Presented at the AESOP/ACSP Joint Congress 2013, Dublin, 15-19 July.
  16. Alexander E.R., 2014, «Land-property Markets and Planning: A Special Case». Land Use Policy, 41: 533-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.009
  17. Alexander E.R., Mazza L., Moroni S., 2012, «Planning Without Plans: Nomocracy or Teleocracy for Social-spatial Ordering». Progress in Planning, 77, 2: 37-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2011.12.001
  18. Beauregard R.A., 1996, «Commentary - Advocating Preeminence: Anthologies as Politics». In Mandelbaum S.J., Mazza L. and Burchell R.W. (eds.), Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR – Rutgers The State University of New Jersey: 105-110.
  19. Bolan R.S., 1996, «Planning and Institutional Design». in Mandelbaum S.J., Mazza L., Burchell R.W. (eds.), Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR – Rutgers The State University of New Jersey: 497-513.
  20. Brunetta G., Moroni S., 2012, Contractual Communities in the Self-Organizing City: Freedom, Creativity, Subsidiarity. Dordrecht: Springer.
  21. Buitelaar E., 2009, «Zoning, More than Just a Tool: Explaining Houston’s Regulatory Practice». European Planning Studies, 17, 7: 1049-1065. DOI: 10.1080/09654310902949588
  22. Chiodelli F., 2012, «Repoliticising Space through Technical Rules». Planning Theory, 11: 115-127. DOI: 10.1177/1473095211420839
  23. Crosta P.L., 1996, «Connecting Knowledge with Action in the Interactive Process of Planning: What Knowledge is Relevant and with whose Actions should we be Concerned?». Planning Theory, 16: 104-122.
  24. Davidoff P., Reiner T.A., 1962, «A Choice Theory of Planning». Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28: 103-115. DOI: 10.1080/01944366208979427
  25. Ellis C., 2005, «Planning Methods and Good City Form». Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22, 2: 138-147.
  26. Faludi A., Waterhout B., 2002, The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London: Routledge.
  27. Friedmann J., 1973, Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
  28. Friedmann J., 1978, «The Epistomology of Social Practice: A Critique of Objective Knowledge». Theory & Society, 6: 75-92. DOI: 10.1007/BF01566158
  29. Friedmann J., 1987, Planning in the Public Domain. Princeton NJ: Princeton U.P. Friedmann J., 2011, Insurgencies: Essays in Planning Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
  30. Ganapati S., 2007, «An Istitutional Analysis of the Evolution of Housign Cooperatives in India». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 155-174.
  31. Gualini E., 2001, Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions. Aldershot, Hamps: Ashgate.
  32. Gunder M., Hillier J., 2009, Planning in Ten Words or Less: A Lacanian Entanglement with Spatial Planning. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
  33. Habermas J., 1981, Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Band I Handlungsrationalität und Gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  34. Healey P., 2006, «The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning ». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 61-87.
  35. Healey P., 2007, «On the Project of ‘Institutional Transformation’ in the Planning Field: Commenting on the Contributors». Planning Theory, 4, 3: 301-310. DOI: 10.1177/1473095205058498
  36. Hijdra A., Woltjer J., Arts J., 2014, «Value Creation in Capital Waterway Projects: Application of a Transaction Cost and Transaction Benefit Framework for the Miami River and the New Orleans Inner Harbor Navigation Canal». Land Use Policy, 38, 1: 91-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.024
  37. Lyotard J-F., 1979, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  38. Marcusen A., 2000, «Planning as Craft and as Philosophy». In Rodwin L., Sanyal B. (eds.), The Profession of City Planning. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey: 261-274.
  39. Matthews T., 2013, «Institutional Perspectives on Operationalising Climate Adaptation through Planning». Planning Theory & Practice, 14, 2: 198-210. DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2013.781208
  40. Mazza L., 1995, «Technical Knowledge, Practical Reason and the Planner’s Responsibility ». Town Planning Review, 66, 4: 389-410.
  41. Mazza L., 2002, «Technical Knowledge and Planning Actions». Planning Theory, 1,1: 11-26. DOI: 10.1177/147309520200100102
  42. Moroni S., 2007, La Città del Liberalismo Attivo. Torino: CittàStudi.
  43. Moroni S., 2010a, «Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Land Use Regulation: Towards Nomocracy». Planning Theory, 9, 2: 137-155. DOI: 10.1177/1473095209357868
  44. Moroni S., 2010b, «An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions and a Dynamic Approach to Reform». Planning Theory, 9, 4: 1-23. DOI: 10.1177/1473095210368778
  45. Raja S., Verma N., 2010, «Got Perspective? A Theoretical View of Fiscal Impact Analysis». Planning Theory, 9, 2: 126-136. DOI: 10.1177/1473095209357866
  46. Teitz M.B., 2007, «Planning and the New Institutionalisms». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 17-35.
  47. Verma N., 2007, «Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Enquiry». In Verma N. (ed.), Institutions and Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 1-14.
  48. Vickers Sir G., 1968, Value Systems and Social Process. New York: Basic Books.
  49. Webster C., Lai L.W-C., 2003, Property Rights, Planning and Markets: Managing Spontaneous Cities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  50. Woltjer J., 2000, Consensus Planning: The Relevance of Communicative Planning Theory in Dutch Infrastructure Development. Aldershot UK: Ashgate.

Ernest R. Alexander, 70 Years’ Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 1/2015, pp 5-18, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2015-001001