Fact, Fiction and Error in Bacon and the Royal Society

Author/s Daniel Garber
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/4
Language English Pages 16 P. 563-578 File size 55 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2016-004002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This essay discusses the problem of error as raised by the Baconian project for natural history. I begin with an account of Bacon’s treatment of the problem, discussing both his celebrated account of the Idols of the mind, and a number of other problems that come up in the construction of natural histories, including the problem of the reliability of the senses, as well as the problem of the reliability of the sources from which the constituents of a natural history are derived. I then consider the version of the Baconian program that is proposed in Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society (1667). Bacon, of course, had proposed a collective form of scientific investigation in his New Atlantis (1626), as a way of carrying out a program too vast for a single investigator. But when it is actually realized in the foundation of the Royal Society, as described in Sprat, I argue that the collective organization proposed also addresses some of the key problems relating to error raised in Bacon’s original program, a feature that goes beyond Bacon’s own original proposal.

Keywords: Error, Bacon, Sprat, Royal Society, Baconian Idols, natural history, experiment

  1. - Arsleff 2008: Hans Aarsleff, Sprat, Thomas; in Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography, vol. XII, Scribner, Detroit 2008, pp. 580-87.
  2. - Bacon 1626a: Francis Bacon, Sylva Sylvarum, Lee, London 1626.
  3. - Bacon 1626b: Id., New Atlantis, Lee, London 1626.
  4. - Bacon 1859-1874: Id., The Works of Francis Bacon, edited by James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath, Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer, London 1859-1874.
  5. - Bacon 1996-: Id., The Oxford Francis Bacon, edited by G. Rees et. al., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996-.
  6. - Corneanu and Vermeir 2012: Sorana Corneanu and Koen Vermeir, Idols of the Imagination: Francis Bacon on the Imagination and the Medicine of the Mind, «Perspectives on Science», XX (2012), pp. 183-206.
  7. - Findlen 1997: Paula Findlen, Francis Bacon and the Reform of Natural History in the Seventeenth Century, in Donald R. Kelley (ed.), History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe, University of Rochester Press, Rochester NY 1997, pp. 239-260.
  8. - Garber 2014: Daniel Garber, Merchants of Light and Mystery Men: Bacon’s Last Projects in Natural History, «Journal of Early Modern Studies», III (2014), pp. 91-106.
  9. - Georgescu 2011: Laura Georgescu, A New Form of Knowledge: Experientia Literata, «Society and Politics», V (2011), pp. 104-120.
  10. - Giglioni 2012: Guido Giglioni, Historia and Materia: The Philosophical Implications of Francis Bacon’s Natural History, «Early Science and Medicine», XVII (2012), pp. 62-86.
  11. - Hunter 1992: Michael Hunter, Latitudinarianism and the ‘Ideology’ of the Early Royal Society: Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society (1667) Reconsidered, in Richard Kroll, Richard Ashcraft, and Perez Zagorin (eds.), Philosophy, Science, and Religion in England, 1640-1700, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992, pp. 199-229.
  12. - Jacob 1980: James R. Jacob, Restoration Ideologies and the Royal Society, «History of Science», XVIII (1980), pp. 25-38.
  13. - Jalobeanu 2012: Dana Jalobeanu, Francis Bacon’s Natural History and the Senecan Natural Histories of Early Modern Europe, «Early Science and Medicine», XVII (2012), pp. 197-229.
  14. - Lynch 2001: William T. Lynch, Solomon’s Child: Method in the Royal Society of London, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2001.
  15. - Lynch 2005: William T. Lynch, A Society of Baconians?: The Collective Development of Bacon’s Method in the Royal Society of London, in Julie Robin Solomon and Catherin Gimelli Martin (eds.), Francis Bacon and the Refiguring of Early Modern Thought, Ashgate, Aldershot 2005, pp. 173-202.
  16. - O’Briant 1975: Walter H. O’Briant, The Genesis, Definition, and Classification of Bacon’s Idols, «Southern Journal of Philosophy», XIII (1975), pp. 347-357.
  17. - Rusu 2012: Doina-Cristina Rusu, Francis Bacon: Constructing Natural Histories of the Invisible, «Early Science and Medicine», XVII (2012), pp. 112-133.
  18. - Shapiro 1968: Barbara Shapiro, Latitudinarianism and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, «Past and Present», XL (1968), pp. 16-41. - Sprat 1667: Thomas Sprat, The History of the Royal-Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge, John Martyn and James Allestry, London 1667.
  19. - Stewart 2012: Ian Stewart, Res, veluti per Machinas, Conficiatur: Natural History and the ‘Mechanical’ Reform of Natural Philosophy, «Early Science and Medicine», XVII (2012), pp. 87-111.
  20. - Wood 1980: Paul B. Wood, Methodology and Apologetics: Thomas Sprat’s History
  21. of the Royal Society, «British Journal for the History of Science», XIII (1980), pp. 1-26.
  22. - Zagorin 2001: Perez Zagorin, Francis Bacon’s Concept of Objectivity and the Idols of the Mind, «British Journal for the History of Science», XXXIV (2001), pp. 379-393.

Daniel Garber, Fact, Fiction and Error in Bacon and the Royal Society in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2016, pp 563-578, DOI: 10.3280/SF2016-004002