Concerned about Going Concern: When do Entities in Liquidation have to be Considered a Non-Going Concern According to IFRS?

Author/s Marius Hasslinger, Michael Olbrich, David Rapp
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1
Language English Pages 31 P. 31-61 File size 315 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2017-001002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The rejection of the going concern premise as the underlying assumption of financial statements has farreaching consequences for accounting. For that reason, it is vitally important to identify the appropriate point in time at which the entity can no longer be regarded as a going concern. Focussing on entities that voluntarily decided to liquidate their operations, the analysis shows that both the IFRS taxonomy and the accounting literature are rather vague on the question of the point in time at which the going concern premise is no longer appropriate. Therefore, we identify the reporting stages that are necessary in the liquidation phase. Contrary to expectations, the paper argues that the going concern assumption should not be immediately abandoned, as retaining it can provide users of financial statements with decisionuseful information. In fact, the paper recommends a value chain based approach. Accordingly, the going concern assumption should not be rejected before the entity has terminated its activities at all stages of its value chain.

Keywords: Going concern, liquidation, IFRS, winding-up.

  1. ACE Aviation Holdings Inc. (2012), Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes 2011, Montreal.
  2. Alexander D. and Nobes Ch. (2013), Financial Accounting – An international introduction (5th ed.). (Pearson Education Limited, Harlow).
  3. Bauch G. (1973), Zur Gliederung und Bewertung der Abwicklungsbilanzen (§ 270 AktG), Der Betrieb, 26, pp. 977-981.
  4. Benson K., Clarkson P.M., Smith T. and Tutticci I. (2015), A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region, Australian Journal of Management, 40, pp. 36-88.
  5. Benson K., Faff R. and Smith T. (2014), Fifty years of finance research in the Asia Pacific Basin, Accounting & Finance, 54, pp. 335-363.
  6. Breitner L.K. and Anthony R.N. (2013), Core Concepts of Accounting (11th ed.). (Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.).
  7. Brühling U.Ch. (1977), Rechnungslegung bei Liquidation, Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, 30, pp. 597-600.
  8. Campisi S. and Trotman K.T. (1985), Auditor Consensus in Going Concern Judgments, Accounting and Business Research, 15, pp. 303-310.
  9. Chang A.M., Bailey Jr. A.D., Mutchler J.F. and Whinston A.B. (1993), Modeling the Going-Concern Judgment Using Argumentation Theory, Journal of Organizational Computing, 3, pp. 51-85.
  10. Choi F.D.S. and Meek G.K. (2011), International accounting (7th ed.). (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River).
  11. Companies House (2014), Liquidation and Insolvency. Available at: -- Accessed: 19.10.15.
  12. Cormier D., Magnan M. and Morar B. (1995), The Auditor’s Consideration of the Going Concern Assumption: A Diagnostic Model, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 10, pp. 201-222.
  13. Ding Y., Richard J. and Stolowy H. (2008), Towards an understanding of the phases of goodwill accounting in four Western capitalist countries: From stakeholder model to shareholder model, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, pp. 718-755.
  14. e-Business Systems Ltd. (2012), Annual Financial Report – Year ended 30 June 2012, West End.
  15. Eickes S. (2014), Zum Grundsatz der Unternehmensfortführung in der Insolvenz. (Wiesbaden: Gabler).
  16. Emerging Markets Credit Opportunities Fund (2013). Reports and financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2012, Dubai.
  17. Ernst & Young LLP (2014), International GAAP 2014 – Generally Accepted Accounting Practice under International Financial Reporting Standards. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Limited).
  18. Eurostat (2014), Business demography by legal form (from 2004 onwards, NACE Rev. 2). Available at: -- Accessed: 19.10.15.
  19. Förschle G. and Deubert M. (1996), Entsprechende Anwendung allgemeiner Vorschriften über den Jahresabschluss in der Liquidations-Eröffnungsbilanz, Deutsches Steuerrecht, 34, pp. 1743-1748.
  20. Förschle G. and Deubert M. (2008), Abwicklungs-/Liquidationsrechnungslegung der Kapitalgesellschaft, in Budde D., Förschle G., and Winkeljohann N. (eds.), Sonderbilanzen: Von der Gründungsbilanz bis zur Liquidationsbilanz (4th ed.), pp. 789-880. (München: C. H. Beck).
  21. Förster W. and Döring V. (2005), Die Liquidationsbilanz (4th ed.). (Köln: Dr. Otto Schmidt).
  22. Freeman E. and Liedtka J. (1997), Stakeholder Capitalism and the Value Chain, European Management Journal, 15, pp. 286-296.
  23. Guiral A. and Esteo F. (2006), Are Spanish auditors skeptical in going concern evaluations?, Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, pp. 598-620.
  24. Hasslinger M. (2010), Zur Rechnungslegung nach IFRS bei Abwicklung der Kapitalgesellschaft, Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis, 62, pp. 276-290.
  25. Hasslinger M. (2011), Zur IFRS-Rechnungslegung der Kapitalgesellschaft in Abwicklung. (Wiesbaden: Gabler).
  26. Heta Asset Resolution AG (2015), Annual Financial Report 2014, Klagenfurt am Worthersee.
  27. Holzmann O.J. and Munter P. (2015), Going-Concern Reporting Now an Accounting Requirement, The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 26, pp. 73-77.
  28. Hüffer U. (2008), Aktiengesetz (8th ed.) (München: C. H. Beck).
  29. IASB (2013), Discussion Paper: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (London: IASB).
  30. IASB (2014), Staff Paper Conceptual Framework, Going concern, IASB Agenda ref 10F. Available at: -- work.pdf. Accessed: 25.10.16.
  31. Jurowsky R. (1997), Bilanzierungszweckentsprechende Liquidationsrechnungslegung für Kapitalgesellschaften, Deutsches Steuerrecht, 35, pp. 1782-1788.
  32. Kebekus F. (2008), IAS/IFRS und Insolvenzrecht, Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht, 37, pp. 275-283.
  33. Koh H.C. and Tan S.S. (1999), A neural network approach to the prediction of going concern status, Accounting and Business Research, 29, pp. 211-216.
  34. KPMG IFRG Limited (2013), Insights into IFRS – KPMG’s practical guide to International Financial Reporting Standards (10th ed.). (London: KPMG IFRG Limited).
  35. Kuruppu N., Laswad F. and Oyelere P. (2003), The efficacy of liquidation and bankruptcy prediction models for assessing going concern, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18, pp. 577-590.
  36. Kuruppu N., Laswad F. and Oyelere P. (2012), Assessing going concern, The practical value of corporate failure models and auditors’ perceptions, Pacific Accounting Review, 24, pp. 33-50.
  37. Leffson U. (1987), Die Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Buchführung (7th ed.). (Düsseldorf: IDW-Verlag).
  38. Matschke M.J. and Brösel G. (2013), Unternehmensbewertung, Funktionen – Methoden – Grundsätze (4th ed.). (Wiesbaden: Gabler).
  39. Melville A. (2014), International Financial Reporting – A Practical Guide (4th ed.). (Harlow: Pearson Education Limited).
  40. Moxter A. (1980), Ist bei drohendem Unternehmenszusammenbruch das bilanzrechtliche Prinzip der Unternehmensfortführung aufzugeben?, Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, 33, pp. 345-351.
  41. Nobes Ch. and Parker R. (2012), Comparative International Accounting (12th ed.). (Harlow: Pearson Education Limited).
  42. O’Clock P. and Devine K. (1995), An Investigation of Framing and Firm Size on the Auditor’s Going Concern Decision, Accounting and Business Research, 25, pp. 197-207.
  43. Olbrich Ch. (1975), Zur Rechnungslegung bei Auflösung einer Aktiengesellschaft, Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, 28, pp. 265-267.
  44. Olbrich M. (2005), Der Grundsatz der Unternehmungsfortführung in der Rechnungslegung der Kapitalgesellschaft bei Auflösung, Der Betrieb, 58, pp. 565-570.
  45. Olbrich M. (2006), International disharmony in accounting for intangibles arising from government grants: The case of airport slots in IFRS, US-GAAP and German GAAP, in Congress Book, The Illinois International Accounting Symposium, pp. 124-161.
  46. Porter M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage – Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. (New York: The Free Press).
  47. Presutti W.D. and Mawhinney J.R. (2009), The value chain revisited, International Journal of Value Chain Management, 3, pp. 146-167.
  48. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2014), Manual of Accounting – IFRS 2014. (London: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP).
  49. Rapp D. (2014), Zur Sanierungs- und Reorganisationsentscheidung von Kreditinstituten. (Wiesbaden: Gabler).
  50. Rodewald J. (1994), Zu Wesen und Wirkung der Liquidations-Schlussbilanz für die GmbH, GmbH-Rundschau, 85, pp. 454-455.
  51. Rosman A.J. (2011), Auditors‘ going-concern judgments: rigid, adaptive, or both?, Review of Accounting and Finance, 10, pp. 30-45.
  52. Ruhnke K. and Nerlich Ch. (2004), Behandlung von Regelungslücken innerhalb der IFRS, Der Betrieb, 57, pp. 389-395.
  53. Sarx M. (1992), Zur Abwicklungs-Rechnungslegung einer Kapitalgesellschaft, in Moxter A., Müller H.-P., Windmöller R., and von Wysocki K. (ed.), Rechnungslegung – Entwicklungen bei der Bilanzierung und Prüfung von Kapitalgesellschaften, Festschrift für Karl-Heinz Forster, pp. 547-560. (Düsseldorf: IDW-Verlag).
  54. Scherrer G. and Heni B. (1992), Externe Rechnungslegung bei Liquidation, Deutsches Steuerrecht, 30, pp. 797-804.
  55. Scherrer G. and Heni B. (2009), Liquidations-Rechnungslegung (3th ed.). (Düsseldorf: IDW-Verlag).
  56. Schmalenbach E. (1917/1918), Die Werte von Anlagen und Unternehmungen in der Schätzungstechnik, Zeitschrift für handelswissenschaftliche Forschung, 12, pp. 1-20.
  57. Sieben G. (1963), Der Substanzwert der Unternehmung. (Wiesbaden: Gabler).
  58. Singer M. and Donoso P. (2007), Upstream or downstream in the value chain? Journal of Business Research, 61, pp. 669-677.
  59. Stanley J., De Zoort F.T. and Taylor G. (2009), The association between insider trading surrounding going concern audit opinions and future bankruptcy, Managerial Auditing Journal, 24, pp. 290-312.
  60. Stolowy H., Haller A. and Klockhaus V. (2001), Accounting for brands in France and Germany compared with IAS 38 (intangible assets): An illustration of the difficulty of international harmonization, The International Journal of Accounting, 36, pp. 147-167.
  61. Streim H. (1998), Internationalisierung von Gewinnermittlungsregeln zum Zwecke der Informationsvermittlung – Zur Konzeptionslosigkeit der Fortentwicklung der Rechnungslegung, in Meffert H. and Krawitz N. (ed.), Festschrift für Dietrich Börner zum 65, pp. 323-343. Geburtstag. (Wiesbaden: Gabler).
  62. TAIB Bank B.S.C. (2016), Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2015, Kingdom of Bahrain.
  63. Veit K.-R. (2005), Sonderprüfungen bei Beendigungen – Liquidationsprüfungen, in Veit K.-R. (ed.), Sonderprüfungen, pp. 291-355. (Herne/Berlin: NWB).
  64. Wellard M.N. (2014), A review of Deeds of Company Arrangement, Australian Insolvency Journal, 26(2), pp. 12-17.
  65. Wollmert P. and Achleitner A.-K. (1997), Konzeptionelle Grundlagen der IAS-Rechnungslegung (Teil II), Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, 50, pp. 245-256.
  66. Xu Y., Jiang A.L., Fargher N. and Carson E. (2011), Audit Reports in Australia during the Global Financial Crisis, Australian Accounting Review, 21, pp. 22-31.

Marius Hasslinger, Michael Olbrich, David Rapp, Concerned about Going Concern: When do Entities in Liquidation have to be Considered a Non-Going Concern According to IFRS? in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2017, pp 31-61, DOI: 10.3280/FR2017-001002