Destructive aggression in the interhuman relation-ship: an evolutionary perspective

Author/s Giovanni Liotti, Lucia Pancheri, Claudio Iannucci, Enrico Costantini, Rosario Esposito, Giuseppe Pollani, Erika Belfiore
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/3
Language Italian Pages 13 P. 161-173 File size 120 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSOB2018-003016
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

SUMMARY. The evolutionary theory of motivation contributes to the understanding of destructiveness in the interhuman relationship, based on the following arguments:
- there is a strong tendency that appeared in the course of evolution, as an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS), to inhibit destructive aggression in clashes between conspecifics;
-some environmental conditions which can be defined sociologically and in humans can also be defined psychologically as they are linked to particular relationship contexts in which the personality development takes place, can weaken this tendency to the extent to cancel its effects;
- in the weakening of the inhibiting mechanism of violence (MoV), as even in its empowerment, motivations and higher mental functions intervene, which typically develop as evolutionary plumes;
- the weakening of MoV causes the actualization of two forms of destructiveness that can afflict the interhuman relationship, which is respectively connected to defense system for survival and the predatory system;
- the knowledge of the behavioral and emotional sequences, characteristic of the two systems, helps to clinically recognize the two forms of interhuman destructiveness in the study of psychopathology.

Keywords: Evolutionary Theory of Motivations (ETM); Aggression Inter-Speci-fic; Destructiveness; Inhibitory Mechanisms of Violence (MoV); Predation.

  1. Anderson C.A., Shibuya A., Ihori N., Swing E., Bushman B.J., Sakamoto A., Rothstein H.R., Saleem M. (2010) “Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review”, Psychological Bulletin, 136(2): 151-173.
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2013) DSM-5:Manuale Diagnostico e Statistico dei Disturbi Mentali, quinta edizione (trad. it.: Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2014)
  3. Barnà A.C. (2015) Etica e psicoanalisi. Relazione presentata al Centro di Psicoanalisi Romano, 16 maggio
  4. Belfiore E., Costantini E., Dettori M., Esposito R., Iannucci C., Pancheri L., Pollani G. (2014) I sistemi motivazionali arcaici compaiono nel dialogo terapeutico. I sistemi di predazione e difesa. Relazione presentata al XVII Congresso Nazionale SITTC, Genova, 28 settembre
  5. Blair R. (1995) “A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath”, Cognition, 57: 1-29. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-
  6. Bowlby J. (1984) La violenza nella famiglia (trad. it. in Bowlby J., Una base sicura, Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 1989, pp. 73-93)
  7. Dawkins R. (1976) Il gene egoista (trad. it.: Mondadori, Milano, 1992)
  8. Fonagy P., Target M. (2008) “Attaccamento, trauma e psicoanalisi: dove la psicoanalisi incontra le neuroscienze”, in Jurist E.L., Slade A., Bergner S. (a cura di), Da mente a mente (trad. it.: Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2010)
  9. Fromm E. (1973) Anatomia della distruttività umana (trad. it.: Mondadori, Milano, 1975)
  10. Hare R.D. (1994) “Predators: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us”, Psychology Today, Jan/Feb
  11. Hare R.D. (2003) PCL-R, seconda edizione (trad. it.: Giunti O.S., Firenze, 2011)
  12. Keegan J. (1993) La grande storia della guerra (trad. it.: Mondadori, Milano, 1994)
  13. Linehan M.M. (1993) Trattamento cognitivo-comportamentale del disturbo borderline: Il modello dialettico (trad. it.: Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2001)
  14. Liotti G. (2014) “Disorganized attachment in the pathogenesis and the psychotherapy of borderline personality disorder”, in Danquah A., Berry K. (eds.), Attachment theory in adult mental health, Routledge, London, pp. 113-128
  15. Liotti G., Farina B. (2011) Sviluppi traumatici, Raffaello Cortina, Milano
  16. Lorenz K. (1963) L’aggressività: Il cosiddetto male (trad. it.: Il Saggiatore, Milano, 2015)
  17. Morris D. (1967) La scimmia nuda (trad. it.: Bompiani, Milano, 1974)
  18. Schore A.N. (2009) “Attachment, trauma and the developing right brain: Origins of pathological dissociation”, in Dell P.F., O’Neil J.A. (eds.), Dissociation and the dissociative disorders, Routledge, New York, pp. 107-141
  19. Solomon J., George C. (2011) “Disorganization of maternal caregiving across two generations: The origins of caregiving helplessness”, in Solomon J., George C. (eds.), Disorganized attachment and caregiving, Guilford, New York, pp. 25-51
  20. Thomas M.E. (2013) Confessioni di una sociopatica (trad. it.: Marsilio, Padova, 2013)
  21. Vogt R. (2013) Perpetrator introjects, Asanger Verlag, Kröning

Giovanni Liotti, Lucia Pancheri, Claudio Iannucci, Enrico Costantini, Rosario Esposito, Giuseppe Pollani, Erika Belfiore, L’aggressività distruttiva nella relazione interumana: una prospettiva evoluzionistica in "PSICOBIETTIVO" 3/2018, pp 161-173, DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2018-003016